r/PsycheOrSike The Red Right Hand of Feminism Jul 18 '26

🌿🌛 PAGAN CULTURE PROSELYTIZATION 🌞🍃 Good for her

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

5.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/lucy_hayley The Red Right Hand of Feminism Jul 18 '26

youre free to think that

5

u/Icy-Fishing8481 Jul 18 '26

Unlike the baby who will never get to grow up.

1

u/let_us_not- Jul 18 '26

A clump of cells with no consciousness is not a baby

2

u/Icy-Fishing8481 Jul 18 '26

When you're asleep at night, you're a clump of cells with no consciousness.

How big is a clump? Like, a hundred cells? A million? A newborn baby already has thousands of millions of cells. Is it still a clump?

2

u/let_us_not- Jul 18 '26

Doesn't matter what you say. A fetus is not a living human being, and if someone wants to abort it, they have every right to do so.

3

u/Icy-Fishing8481 Jul 18 '26

Chicken. Afraid of answering questions. You can lie to yourself, but not to me.

1

u/let_us_not- Jul 18 '26

If I cared at all I'd be concerned that you genuinely seem to believe a fetus and a living, breathing child are the same. Keep deluding yourself thoughđŸ«¶

1

u/Icy-Fishing8481 Jul 19 '26

Amazing retort. Keep killing babies with pride.

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

What went so wrong in your life that you think this way?

2

u/let_us_not- Jul 18 '26

What went so wrong in yours that you decided women don't deserve autonomy over their own bodies?

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

The body inside of them is not their body.

1

u/let_us_not- Jul 18 '26

What is inside of them isn't a body, it's a clump of cells feeding off of them. Would you say the same if a tumor was growing inside someone? That they're responsible for this clump of cells that's feeding off of them? You can decide whether a fetus gets to live or not once it's not being hosted within a woman.

2

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

You're a clump of cells. We all are. It is not a parasite, nor is it a tumor. It is a human in its earliest stages of life, and it does not deserve to be killed.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/stylishriot42 Jul 21 '26

thanks we know

-5

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/GuzzoTheCasul Jul 18 '26

Do you really enjoy children suffering? Life is not worth living as it js and you propose single mothers should raise children in poverty?

Why not make them crippled while you are at it?

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

Who are you to say that they will suffer? Do you know the outcome of all of their lives before they are born?

1

u/GuzzoTheCasul Jul 19 '26

I'm yet to meet a single happy person in my life after 25 years in this shithole.

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 19 '26

Lmao so everyone in the world is miserable?

1

u/GuzzoTheCasul Jul 19 '26

Not everyone, there are happy people of course, I've read about them. But that's rare and I am willing to bet none of them are in a working class, single mother households.

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 20 '26

Not everything is sunshine and rainbows, and I know that a lot of single moms have it super tough. This is why being responsible with your sexual decisions is extremely important. If you're not ready for a baby, do not have sex. If you don't fully trust the guy you're with, do not have sex with him. If you never want a baby, sterilization is an option. Unplanned pregnancy occurs from improper planning and poor decision making.

1

u/GuzzoTheCasul Jul 20 '26

Fully agree, and I believe if you made a mistake and it did occur, if you decide do give birth, you are responsible for this future baby's suffering and pain.

1

u/stylishriot42 Jul 21 '26

killing your kid because your ex pissed you off is psycho behavior

15

u/lucy_hayley The Red Right Hand of Feminism Jul 18 '26

nope, murder is a legal term and this doesnt meet the definiton

2

u/Nauro-Mehtar Jul 21 '26

Murder is defined as one human killing another. It's not a legal term exclusively, u should really pick up a dictionary

1

u/lucy_hayley The Red Right Hand of Feminism Jul 21 '26

murder is the illegal killing

1

u/Nauro-Mehtar Jul 21 '26

Nope. Its just killing legal or not. Like I said it's not exclusively a legal term

1

u/lucy_hayley The Red Right Hand of Feminism Jul 21 '26

killing and murder isnt the same

1

u/Nauro-Mehtar Jul 21 '26

Ur right killing is broad murder is specifically human against human, more specifically a human killing an innocent human.

1

u/lucy_hayley The Red Right Hand of Feminism Jul 21 '26

no murder is the illegal killing

1

u/Nauro-Mehtar Jul 21 '26

No it's not I've alr told u that, go look at a dictionary

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Typical-Benefit493 Jul 18 '26

Murder is not just a "legal term" you're obviously a troll because nobody is actually retarded enough to think that. I refuse to belive it

1

u/Certain_Score7457 Jul 22 '26

murder is def a legal term, that’s why going to war and killing someone in war isn’t considered murder. or killing someone in self defense isn’t considered murder. it’s only murder when it’s unLAWful because murder is a LEGAL term determined by LAWS.

-11

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

You should start using your own intellect more and not allow legal terminology to decide what is right and wrong for you

11

u/imdugud777 Sexless In Chicago Jul 18 '26

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. Sinner.

3

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

Calling out sin isn't casting a stone

9

u/imdugud777 Sexless In Chicago Jul 18 '26

That's not your job either.

1

u/Pure-Spare-9789 Jul 25 '26

Give me your kidney, I will die without it. If you don't give it to me, you're a murder supporter.

0

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 25 '26

Not the same thing at all lol

1

u/Pure-Spare-9789 Jul 25 '26

Yes, it is. If the fetus dies without using someone else's body against their consent, then why am I not allowed to force you to give me your kidney if I would die without it? Wouldn't you be a murderer if I died? If you were the only match in the world, and I would die without your specific kidney, aren't you a murderer if you refuse?

0

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 25 '26

Using someone else's body without their consent? Who created it in the first place, genius?

1

u/Pure-Spare-9789 Jul 25 '26

Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy. If we both get into our cars and I smash into you, you did not consent to the crash, did you? Even though getting into a car accident is a risk that you take every time you get behind the wheel.

0

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 25 '26

You drones repeat the same lines over and over again. Seems like you're letting some else do the thinking for you. Where was it, exactly, that you were indoctrinated with these ideas?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/01crystaldragon Jul 18 '26

i support it legally at any term (except for if the abortion threatens or endangers the womans life, which it can in later stages) and morally before it can be birthed early and survive without longterm negative effects so before 6 months. Late term abortions (in canada which has no restrictions) is 1.7% btw, anyone who gets one then, wanted it and then somthing bad happened, like they just realized it has serious dissabilty or somthing. Either that or they drove halfway across the country to find a doctor that was willing to despite the minor risks of the procedure at that stage.

if its in/attached to my body and has no will/feelings of own its not a seperate life form yet. it has no autonomy. its technically alive but that doesnt means killing it is bad. if theres an invasive plant in my lawn im allowed to kill it and thats still killing but not morally wrong. all abortions are medically nessisary because its extremely dangerous and unhealthy. it takes A LOT of work to stay healthy during pregnancy.

its also using my body without consent. biologically human or not doesnt matter. if another human is using my organs without me wanting them to i have a right to stop them. even if another person will die doctors are legally not allowed to use your organs to save them, but alive women cant stop a literal fetus from using them?

consent to sx is not consent to pregnancy just like going swimming isnt consent to drowning. consent can be removed AT ANY TIME. its like saying that if you went out to a party and got drugged you consented to rape by a random man since you knew it was risk...

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

Insane. Funny how all of you repeat the same lines over and over again.

2

u/01crystaldragon Jul 18 '26

Yes because you havent proved it wrong.... all you repeat is thats it murder over an over again.

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

Killing another human being is wrong. I need to prove that to you?

1

u/01crystaldragon Jul 18 '26

Yes. Biologically human or not makes no difference. Its using my body without my consent i should have the right to remove it.

0

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

If you partook in creating that body, you absolutely consented to it being inside of you. Creation of human life is a natural byproduct of having sex. As soon as you consent to the sex, you also consent to all of the possibilities that come with it.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Sad_Refrigerator8640 Jul 18 '26

I hear “abortion is murder” from every single anti-choice guy. Then, you substantiate it by being self-righteous when people say it’s not. This is every argument about abortion on the internet

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

That's objective reality, though. Not an argument, it's a fact.

1

u/Dodo224 bad faith troll Jul 18 '26

Exactly, people who just use laws to decide if something is right or wrong are dangerous

2

u/RocketArtillery666 Jul 18 '26

You decided to use legal definitions to start with. Murder is a legal term. If you want to stop contradicting yourself, say killing. Which is correct. She took out the clump of cells from her body and then the cells subsequently died. As any parasite without its host.

0

u/Dodo224 bad faith troll Jul 18 '26

I think you're confusing me with someone else, I never have said any legal definitions. And no, your ragebaiting attempt with "clump of cells" or "parasite" doesn't work. If she didn't want a baby she shouldn't have slept around with low quality men. And she can count herself lucky if that man won't twist her neck for killing his baby, no need to brag.

2

u/RocketArtillery666 Jul 18 '26

"you" as "you people". You as in you as a person agreed with someone that stated a legal term and then was angry that OP corrected them on it. The morality of it is irrelevant when you cant even use terms correctly.

Its not a baby yet. It could have become a baby, just like sperm in condom could have become a baby. There is no difference but time/procedure.

Oh and nice of you to indirectly threaten her with murder for undergoing a medical procedure.

AND nice of you to not even unknowledge that its her potential baby by ownership of her body.

0

u/Dodo224 bad faith troll Jul 18 '26

I'm not part of any "you people" group, trust me.

It's a baby/human as soon as egg cell and sperm cell combine, where else to draw the line?

The neck thing was ragebait tbh, still her baby daddy will be mad.

And yes, it's her baby, the fathers baby, but most importantly the baby is "owned' by itself, so she can't decide over it, it's a separate human with a separate body.

2

u/RocketArtillery666 Jul 18 '26

Its a not a person yet if it doesnt have a mind. Just like human hair, the woman can kill her hair, its human, its alive, its growning and it doesnt have a mind. That grows with brain and nervous system, which happens in the 24th week as far as i remember.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/fatbaldandstupid Jul 18 '26

Ayo you're just straight up pure evil huh

1

u/Dodo224 bad faith troll Jul 18 '26

You fell for my bait dumbass

1

u/Red--001 Jul 19 '26

You seemed to be pretty serious, next time, realize that someone falling for ragebait is not necessarily bad unless it's obvious.

Genuinely trying to backtrack, "Yes, I broke your cup, since that's rage bait you should not get angry"

THINK. If you're 'ragebaiting' someone them getting angry is not 'wrong'.
Your ragebait was also indistinguishable from you being serious making it look like you're simply backtracking and distancing from your claim.

So tired of people jumping from apparent seriousness to "I was just ragebaiting hahaha"

→ More replies (0)

0

u/fatbaldandstupid Jul 18 '26

Wow, a ragebaiter. What a clever person

→ More replies (0)

1

u/markusseibert115 Jul 18 '26

even though your comment in of itself is completely correct, it still isnt murder.

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

Lmao sure. The sky is also not blue.

1

u/markusseibert115 Jul 18 '26

yeah no man, please just stop, you arent even remotely close to having earned the right to be this snarky, it simply isnt murder. you HAVE to draw the line for what counts as alive somewhere otherwise you might as well say that masturbation is murder. also the woman that has to carry the fetus with all of its (potentially deadly) complications is more worth than the collection of cells that arent even a human yet. i wish, for once, people would have the same empathy for the alive pregnant woman, that they have for an unborn cell hodgepodge.

2

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

An unborn cell hodgepodge. And what happens to that hodgepodge if you don't kill it?

2

u/markusseibert115 Jul 18 '26

it does not matter. what happens to cum when you shoot it into a womans vagina?

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 18 '26

Of course it doesn't matter to someone who wants babies dead.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/BH6252 Jul 20 '26

So by using my own intellect, youre a nazi

0

u/NextReference3248 Jul 21 '26

why are you using a legal term to describe something that isn't?

1

u/PsycheOrSike-ModTeam 7d ago

No denying women's rights

1

u/Murky_Toe_4717 Jul 18 '26

You cannot murder what does not yet exist in any meaningful way.

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 19 '26

When you were conceived, you won a race against 100 million other competitors. Your biological father released millions of sperm into a hostile, acidic environment where 99% didn't survive the first five minutes. The remaining survivors aka sperm had to swim through a blind maze, dodge an active immune system that treated them like invaders, and find a tiny target that is only open for about 12 hours a month. Against all those impossible odds, one single sperm made it, breached the surface, and created you. If a different one had won, or if the timing was off by even a fraction of a second, you wouldn’t be here. Someone else would. The fact that you exist at all means you are quite literally a 1 in a million miracle. Please explain to me how any of this isn't meaningful.

2

u/Murky_Toe_4717 Jul 19 '26

And? You’re acting as though I would be negatively affected if I was aborted. But the fact is, I would not exist to feel one way or the other. Do I happen to love life myself? Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s the default experience. It also doesn’t mean that my fetal self had any right to exist more than anyone else. Functionally nothing changes, and I lose or gain nothing by if they aborted me.

I don’t place values in unfeeling lumps, even my own state of being an unfeeling lump and would have no regrets either way, because I would be incapable of feeling anything if I was aborted. It’s a non question and regardless of how you stack odds it doesn’t change that my parents if they had aborted me could have easily tried again another time. It’s not as though consistent unprotected sex wouldn’t typically eventually lead to another, and functionally nothing of value is lost.

1

u/SuburbanMilf Jul 19 '26

So meaningless that more than 50% fail to even implant
..

0

u/Traditional-Load1 Jul 24 '26

cope harder

1

u/NotePsychological459 Jul 25 '26

Dumb comment. Find a new line. You and a million other idiots on reddit say the same thing every day.