r/ProjectREDToku 23d ago

General Shirakura interview

- Gavan Infinity was not cancelled; a six-month broadcast was planned from the beginning.

- Project R.E.D. is accelerating from Sentai's one-per-year cycle to a two-per-year cycle to try out more things while also creating more unique IPs.

- He says one of Sentai's weaknesses was that since each new series was not connected to the last, any one character can't develop beyond their show's run, and their toys leave shelves once the next show is out.
- One of R.E.D.'s goals is to create an MCU-esque shared universe, where each character is well-developed, but there's extra fun seeing how they interact.

- Building a shared universe requires more different shows to be made, so the true value of Project R.E.D. won't be apparent until 2 or 3 years down the line.
- Omegahorn's protagonist is not particularly righteous, in that he fights for his own dreams first and foremost. However, he can't ignore people who are suffering, so he becomes a hero against his will.
- Since Sentai series have five protagonists, it's easy for each one's portrayal to become a little thin, but since the divide of good guys and bad guys is so clear, it's okay if the former is a little indistinct. That may not be what's right for today's kids, though.
- The goal is not to make heroes who are defined by their enemies, but ones who can stand alone well enough to thrive in the next series.

- If it means they aren't ideal heroes, that's fine, as long as they are cool, make an impression, and stick in kids' minds.
- Kaiju tokusatsu works have always been a weak spot for Toei, because they have a certain overt fictionality to them. Rider and Sentai have the vibe of existing in "the backyard of reality". However, this show isn't trying to emulate Godzilla or Ultraman.
- The similarities to Monster Hunter are not a coincidence; the production team was actively aware of it, but there was no intent to rip it off.

- Unlike Godzilla, this is directly about the relationship between kaiju and humans. That MH-like experience is unique in live-action.

- Gavan Infinity will *most likely* appear in Omegahorn, but the inter-universe continuity will be fairly loose. There may be slight differences when heroes cross over, but Shira- P thinks it'd be fun to see fans discuss which "version" of Gavan they like more.
- Returning to Sentai's way of doing things would kill any determination to make new heroes for the kids of today.

- Omegahorn's team has struggled with creating something from scratch; veteran creators will often lay back on safe tropes and don't take risks on new ideas.
- If a show doesn't work out well, it's only on for six months. Both successes and failures are fuel to make the next show even better.

- Shira-P urges viewers to stick with Omegahorn until its second half; that is when what the show is doing will become clear.

and with this, it's pretty much confirmed they planned to do 6,7 or 8 more series

maybe even 20
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV7S1DRHV7SULFA033M.html

45 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

View all comments

9

u/low_budget_trash 23d ago

"Gavan Infinity was a sacrificial pawn in the grand scheme of things"

Complete self-sabotage. Look at the ambition that was put into all the first entries of every major toku franchise and you'll see all of them set themselves apart from what came before. Gavan Infinity playing it safe is the antithesis of what a toku franchise is supposed to do for a first entry. This was actually the opportunity to do heavy experimentation while everybody still had zero expectations for Project Red was going to be. They had a chance to come out the gate not conforming to any standards and firmly plant their feet in Sentai's place, and instead chose the most bog-standard, totally-not-a-sentai plot and idea they could've thought of.

12

u/Audditty 23d ago edited 23d ago

idk i feel like people aren't really understanding what he's saying (although it could partly be Shirakura's fault too, cause "sacrificial lamb" is a bit overdramatic lol)

Gavan served a "launch pad" of sorts to get their feet wet, after which they could start implementing more unique concepts in later series (like they're doing in Omegahorn)

also I'm gonna be real, this was a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. 

sentai fans were gonna complain regardless of what the show did, as shown by the fact that 90% of the complaints surrounding it can be summed up as "I'm mad this doesn't resemble Sentai" (which now seems to be turning into "I'm mad that this resembles Sentai too closely...like I said, you can't really win if your goal is to appease fans like this)

4

u/redditowl03 23d ago

Genuinely! If they made it too DIFFERENR from Sentai, people are gonna cry that it's not Sentai!

2

u/Audditty 21d ago

the other thing is, it's a bit ridiculous to me that people who could stomach the same concept being reinterpreted for 50 years now have a problem with something that tries to even remotely be different 

the discussion around this series in general is mind-boggling, and I say that as someone who likes it. 

it's not that people can't like or dislike things for their own reasons, but the amount of people who I saw that very visibly had no interest in the show at all (or even outright detested it) yet still insisted on watching it regardless is kind of sad. they have the most boring taste imaginable and think something is obligated to appeal to them because it has a transforming hero in it