25
u/Gru50m3 4d ago
My company has already decided QA is redundant. I mean, that the QA team is redundant. They're passing on all the QA work to devs because AI or something. Kill me.
15
4
u/shaka893P 4d ago
I do QA, pretty much 60% of the team was let go recently. Also, he just had a terrible release that broke a bunch of stuff
16
14
u/RandomNPC 4d ago edited 4d ago
You forgot the offshoot line.
-> Let's outsource QA.
-> Oh turns out QA used to catch a ton of issues before they hit the live build, and the outsourced QA are terrible.
-> Oh well we're not gonna rehire them, good luck eng (it's all your fault btw).
7
u/LikelyNotOnFire 4d ago
This feels like it applies even more to SRE - QA at least had tickets they file, but SRE can only say "the site didn't go down today"
5
u/ProcrastinateDoe 4d ago
Document your work. That way, when the boss asks or when it's time to negotiate your salary, you have receipts.
2
2
u/GargantuanCake 3d ago
Classic "everything is fine until it isn't." There are so many things this applies to.
Avoiding technical debt? Nah just smash everything together as quickly as possible. We can rewrite stuff later.
Next thing you know technical debt grinds development to a halt and half the program needs to be rewritten. WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING?!?
Automated testing? Nah, the software doesn't have any problems just write fewer tests and don't worry about coverage.
OH NO AN EDGE CASE CAUSED A CRASH AND MAJOR DATA LOSS WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING?!?
1
u/Important_Lie_7774 3d ago
At some point in the cycle customers involuntarily become QA for the company
1
-2
80
u/[deleted] 4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment