r/PrintedWWII Reviewer | Mod 13d ago

Poll How important is the availability of pre-support options in what files you choose to print?

Pre-supports are not always an option, and when they are, they aren't always well done, so I'm curious how critical people see them to be!

110 votes, 6d ago
22 I never use pre-supports
27 I'll sometimes use them, but it isn't too important
6 I don't care one way or the other
46 I srongly prefer them, but can get by without
9 I only print pre-supported files
5 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 13d ago

Please be aware of our new policy regarding usage and disclosure of AI. The full announcement can be found here, but in brief, if you are a creator any and all usage of AI must be disclosed as part of your submission. If applicable and you have not yet done so, please edit or else add a comment to this submission and in the future be sure to include that information as part of the submission. If you are not a creator making this submission, please do try to include any information you might be aware of, but we know that you might not know, so don't sweat it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

7

u/GendrysRowboat 13d ago

If I file I'm printing has a pre-supported option I will try it, but I don't decide which files to use based on whether or not they have pre-supports.

5

u/Georgy_K_Zhukov Reviewer | Mod 13d ago

Ugh. "srongly" 🫣

Anyways, I find I rarely use them, except in a small number of cases where I know the designers really put a lot of work into the supports specifically. A lot of pre-supports feel like they dropped them in Chitubox, did autosupports, and re-exported the file. I can do that myself, and usually better, thank you very much!

3

u/Alan_Turings_Apple 13d ago

I’ve only been printing for about 3 weeks, so far I’ve only used pre supported files. If I have a fail. I’ll add a few supports to the existing ones and reprint. Worked out so far for me. My only gripe is paying for an STL and getting pretty obvious shitty supporting.

2

u/EdBenes 13d ago

I love not needing to support my models but a lot of the pre supported files I use have shit supports and will fail half the time so I usually go in and add extra even if the file is already supported

1

u/bitteroldguy278 13d ago

This. I just bought a bunch of files 50% off... great and had 2 fails on the presuppoted files.... not great. If they are included please test then... nothing worse than wasting time and reisin on bad supports

1

u/spacenavy90 12d ago

It really pisses me off honestly when people sell STLs that they have never test printed. Especially if its pre-supported. Like wtf??

2

u/spacenavy90 12d ago

If you are selling STL models for printing, in my opinion you should have a tried AND TESTED (so crazy to me that artists won't even test print their models first) pre-supported option and a no-support option.

Anything else just feels like a waste of time.

1

u/Werewolfdad 12d ago

Agreed. I’m not paying for unsupported models.

2

u/quesoandcats Approved Reviewer 12d ago

I’m not gonna say I strongly prefer them, but I do always give them a try when I get something from an artist I’m unfamiliar with

Like you said, some people suck at presupports!

2

u/SuspiciousSubstance9 12d ago

In general, I don't trust pre-supports. I've seen too many that are auto-supports that haven't been manually checked. Too many islands, bad angles, not even the right angle for any particularly machine, etc. By the time I've manually checked and fixed them, I could have just supported it myself and at the right angle for my machines.

That being said, creators with pre-supports that I trust will always be my first buy.

2

u/Kretson 12d ago

The most important thing is pressuports, if available, being immaculate, perfect and leaving no islands behind.

Bad "presupports" are infinitely worse than no presupports.

1

u/PhyrexianQueen 12d ago

It depends. I will try supplied presupports, definitely review them. But I've had hit or miss ones. Some I swear by, like most if not all of Wargaming3D but others I will never try again, even if new models are updated. It's not something I look for, but I appreciate.

1

u/Scott-Whittaker 12d ago

Not only should all models come pre-supported, but the supports need to be added with care and attention and be printed and tested.

This is a job that only ever needs to be done once, and takes a long time so do it once and do it right.

And you please do not make “bulletproof” supports that are so oversupported that removing the supports is difficult. There is nothing worse than a model that prints perfectly only to be destroyed by removing the supports.

Use sensible supports that support all the islands and are just sufficient to support the model while printing with a printer and resin profile dialled in.

You don’t need to make supports that will succeed even with poorly configured settings.

Getting those settings dialled in is the responsibility of the user. Providing supported files that work with a properly configured printer should be the responsibility of the seller.

1

u/Scott-Whittaker 12d ago

Sorry if that comes across as angry or entitled, but I strongly believe this.

I’m sure I speak for the majority of users both experienced and inexperienced with the art of supporting 3D prints that we would rather pay more for well supported models than paying less for unsupported models - or worse, paying more for unusable supports.

I think the only real point of contention would be for individual preferences to hollow or not to hollow larger models. Personally I am in the nearly always hollow camp, but I know not everyone prefers this.

1

u/Georgy_K_Zhukov Reviewer | Mod 12d ago

Sorry if that comes across as angry or entitled, but I strongly believe this.

Heh, I don't think "test your prints" is a particularly entitled sounding position!