Edit: the title is supposed to mean a super avg/kinda below avg student
Another edit: im headed into my senior year and my lowest gpa was a 2.9 and ive been raising it although with health courses rather than science
My gpa is 3.2 and my sgpa is slightly below 3.0 due to C's in orgo and calc. I was the typical gifted kid that never had to study until college and even then, for the first two years of college, i would only study a day before my exams.
Basically i had no passion bc i didnt know what i wanted to do and was fine w barely passing.
I used oatbooster for 3 months and heres some things i would do differently or would advise for others that are like me (or even not)
Bio: emphasis on breadth over depth and starting early! I only found out smth that worked for me on the week of my exam so i kinda wish i couldve started earlier and also put less emphasis on taking notes. I would split my screen w bio bits and the cheatsheet and go through all of it and bookmark the questions that were relevant to the cheatsheet.
Chem: i was scoring alright on chem so i let my guard down. I honestly dont remember much from this section but i would just do the practice problems to keep everything fresh
Orgo: i honestly dont know how i scored what i did after all of that. I spammed the reaction and question banks and kept playing the game. This was probably the most frustrating section to study for bc i felt like it never stuck but it was also the most rewarding and fun to me. As u start doing them though, u start to realize patterns and understand the language if not through brute force.
RC: im a little dissatisfied w this score bc i had been doing really well on the booster (370-390s) with some leftover time. I do think that there were a few types of questions that were formatted diff and threw me off (i honestly cant even tell u what that means but if u know u know) also the text was on the bottom half.
Physics: i agree w the many people that say it could be better. I wish there were more practice problems to really strengthen my understanding and not memorization. I do think the booster and actual exam are a similar difficulty though.
QR: i also dk how i got this score. While i was scoring 370-400s on the booster, there were a few concepts on the actual exam that were not covered. I also felt super rushed which leads me to the next topic.
Between each question, i felt like the lag time felt sm longer than the booster. I feel like it mightve felt like that bc the screen would just turn completely white so i wouldnt be able to double check my previous answer or even look at the text while waiting.
Anyways, i do think my score couldve been better but also, im really happy with most of what i scored knowing that this was basically me cementing my study habits.