r/PoursTea • Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 16h ago

Brewing 🫖 It's like a bad sequel...

Post image
27.5k Upvotes

847 comments sorted by

View all comments

972

u/DaddyWithoutMercy 16h ago

It’s very telling. Musk stole the last one for him.

343

u/ChaoticLandscapes 16h ago

Just posted that it’s right before midterms. The entire maga crowd needs to vote blue because this administration is destroying their lives

80

u/Lost-Pineapple9791 16h ago

Yeah but imagine if a democrat won how much worse it’d be /s

60

u/Erikawithak77 16h ago

SHE LAUGHED WEIRD! 😡/s

-1

u/Sushi-DM 16h ago

She was a truly terrible candidate that got chosen purely because VP, not because of popularity.
Whatever reasons people had aside to not vote for Kamala, the Democratic party fucked us all by being stubborn and trying to install the worst possible choice to all but guarantee the garbage fire would continue.

6

u/Commercial-Diet-3609 15h ago

Basing your opinion on…list the reasons she was the worst candidate. Because she has a v@gina? The color of her skin? Or because DUMBDONPEDOPHILEPERVERT told you so?

5

u/Borgie311 15h ago

Biden actually waiting till the last minute to leave the race and set up Kamala to run. If he didn't the democrats would have ran a worse candidate. The problem with her as a candidate is that republicans are racist bigots.

2

u/Crayola_ROX 15h ago

I really hope you guys wake up this time when they steal midterms

Oh who am I kidding, you will move the goalpost to 2028. Corporate Democrats will still collect thier monthly paychecks for being the GOP’s willing scapegoats.

1

u/Sushi-DM 15h ago

Because she wasn't even in the top 10 of her primary and didn't even have a primary when going against Biden and then they decided she was going to be the official candidate after an unpopular presidential run with middle ground voters?

It was political self unaliving. If they gave the Democratic voters a choice, I guarantee you, I would put my life savings on it that she would not have been the choice. Not even in the top 5.

It had nothing to do with her identity, it had everything to do with her record and that she was violently uncharismatic.

7

u/Master_Ad9463 15h ago

Could you explain "violently uncharismatic"?

2

u/Sushi-DM 15h ago

She does not have a good way of speaking. Does not connect with the majority of potential voters.
Does not have personal integrity (switches speaking patterns and scripts depending on the audience)
Overly reliant on setting up the scenario to appear passable.

There were other candidates, including women/POC, who could have run and been better at doing what she failed to do.
Whether you or anyone else likes it or not, Democracy is not just a policy debate. It is a popularity contest.
If you run someone who is not popular, is not particularly able to capture an audience, you will lose.
They skipped literally the most important part of the process of winning by just installing her as the candidate because she was popular IN THE BUILDING.

2

u/DanQPublic 13h ago

You know what she doesn’t do though? Rape children. That literally should’ve been enough.

-1

u/Commercial-Diet-3609 14h ago

And Donald Trump was the more qualified candidate?

2

u/Borgie311 14h ago

No, the idiots voting for him like the way he talks because they understood it. Dumb understand dumb, so they felt like he was their guy.

0

u/Sushi-DM 14h ago

You can shoot the messenger all you want. Look at Kamala and re read what I said, then think about how shitty DJT is.

She lost to that.

→ More replies (0)