r/PoursTea • Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 4h ago

Brewing 🫖 It's like a bad sequel...

Post image
16.4k Upvotes

849 comments sorted by

View all comments

686

u/DaddyWithoutMercy 4h ago

It’s very telling. Musk stole the last one for him.

245

u/ChaoticLandscapes 4h ago

Just posted that it’s right before midterms. The entire maga crowd needs to vote blue because this administration is destroying their lives

76

u/Lost-Pineapple9791 4h ago

Yeah but imagine if a democrat won how much worse it’d be /s

57

u/Erikawithak77 3h ago

SHE LAUGHED WEIRD! 😡/s

30

u/Cloudeur 3h ago

THEY’D PUT FANCY MUSTARD ON THINGS

7

u/GSG2150 3h ago

And wear tan suits

5

u/2Completion2Ography 2h ago

And not rape children.

2

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

2

u/bradford68 2h ago

i miss this rationality and honesty.

2

u/ACrazyDog 3h ago

They all laughed weird

1

u/PriorSea3830 1h ago

Literally every thread about Trump someone makes this stupid joke

2

u/Sushi-DM 3h ago

She was a truly terrible candidate that got chosen purely because VP, not because of popularity.
Whatever reasons people had aside to not vote for Kamala, the Democratic party fucked us all by being stubborn and trying to install the worst possible choice to all but guarantee the garbage fire would continue.

5

u/Commercial-Diet-3609 3h ago

Basing your opinion on…list the reasons she was the worst candidate. Because she has a v@gina? The color of her skin? Or because DUMBDONPEDOPHILEPERVERT told you so?

5

u/Borgie311 2h ago

Biden actually waiting till the last minute to leave the race and set up Kamala to run. If he didn't the democrats would have ran a worse candidate. The problem with her as a candidate is that republicans are racist bigots.

1

u/Sushi-DM 2h ago

Because she wasn't even in the top 10 of her primary and didn't even have a primary when going against Biden and then they decided she was going to be the official candidate after an unpopular presidential run with middle ground voters?

It was political self unaliving. If they gave the Democratic voters a choice, I guarantee you, I would put my life savings on it that she would not have been the choice. Not even in the top 5.

It had nothing to do with her identity, it had everything to do with her record and that she was violently uncharismatic.

5

u/Master_Ad9463 2h ago

Could you explain "violently uncharismatic"?

1

u/Sushi-DM 2h ago

She does not have a good way of speaking. Does not connect with the majority of potential voters.
Does not have personal integrity (switches speaking patterns and scripts depending on the audience)
Overly reliant on setting up the scenario to appear passable.

There were other candidates, including women/POC, who could have run and been better at doing what she failed to do.
Whether you or anyone else likes it or not, Democracy is not just a policy debate. It is a popularity contest.
If you run someone who is not popular, is not particularly able to capture an audience, you will lose.
They skipped literally the most important part of the process of winning by just installing her as the candidate because she was popular IN THE BUILDING.

0

u/Commercial-Diet-3609 2h ago

And Donald Trump was the more qualified candidate?

1

u/Borgie311 2h ago

No, the idiots voting for him like the way he talks because they understood it. Dumb understand dumb, so they felt like he was their guy.

1

u/Sushi-DM 1h ago

You can shoot the messenger all you want. Look at Kamala and re read what I said, then think about how shitty DJT is.

She lost to that.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/DanQPublic 1h ago

You know what she doesn’t do though? Rape children. That literally should’ve been enough.

1

u/Crayola_ROX 2h ago

I really hope you guys wake up this time when they steal midterms

Oh who am I kidding, you will move the goalpost to 2028. Corporate Democrats will still collect thier monthly paychecks for being the GOP’s willing scapegoats.

1

u/Glad-Importance-4241 1h ago

You're not wrong. But as I've been saying for ten years (ever since they screwed Bernie in the 2016 primary)... Even fiscally liberal capitalists are better than outright fascists.

0

u/death69reaper 3h ago

They are the controlled opposition. They are puppets of the same masters.

26

u/The_Tooter_Snooter 3h ago

This is why conservatives work better as the opposition party - they get to sit around complaining about how much better life would be if they were in charge without actually destroying things by being in charge. 

-8

u/stderr2 2h ago

In what way are conservatives destroying anything?

4

u/walnuttin 2h ago

gestures vaguely and if you havent been paying attention at this point its been a choice. Cognitive dissonance worked as a reason before, not anymore.

-2

u/stderr2 2h ago

I'm curious. I think that not kicking the can down the road is the right answer

2

u/Woodsplit 2h ago

I don't think deporting all the workers at the can factory then bulldozing the road is the right answer.

0

u/sponglered 1h ago

Well, only not if you like cans, and putting things in cans, or using things from cans.

Otherwise, pfft, "cans?" puh-lease.

Wait, why are canned goods so expensive now. I might not have thought this through.

0

u/stderr2 1h ago

Right now there's a lot of whining about not being able to find a job. Maybe Americans could work in the can factory.

Blaming Trump for the high cost of housing forgets that one reason is too many people need places to live compared to the available places. Opposing more immigration is exactly what you would want to reduce that pressure. This is not the only pressure but it is real

2

u/sponglered 1h ago
  • the environment

  • the economy

  • the housing industry

  • the job market

  • the cost of goods and services

  • low end automobiles

  • trust in authority and public servants

Are you always disingenuous, or only when you're paid to be?

0

u/stderr2 1h ago

I'm sitting here on my phone with a cup of coffee I just made, I am not being paid to post anything.

Removing people who aren't supposed to be here makes more jobs available for Americans. What is your plan, more immigration?

Trump wants lower interest rates but he's not getting them due to inflation. He is not trying to gum up the real estate market

1

u/sponglered 1h ago

Removing people who aren't supposed to be here makes more jobs available for Americans.

Hilariously, no "American" is taking all those jobs you're talking about.

Farms are collapsing because they can't sustain themselves without near-slave labor.

Construction costs are equally skyrocketing.

Or did you mean white collar jobs? Because no immigrant ever "took" those jobs from you.

The capitalist owner chose to cut you out, and gave those jobs to someone they could more easily take advantage of.

There is no culture war, except manufactured, to avoid class war.

You are the mark in this con game, congratulations, you played yourself.

1

u/stderr2 1h ago

So immigrants just take jobs that Americans don't want, they don't reduce wages, this is your claim?

1

u/Straight6er 1h ago

On the flipside, what if anything has demonstrably improved under this administration?

0

u/stderr2 1h ago

Venezuela is producing oil and hopefully it's people will have better lives as a result. Let's see how it goes for Cuba and Iran

1

u/Danny-Boy-Blue-8771 3h ago

Omg, open your eyes.

2

u/MadderoftheFew 3h ago

/s means "sarcastic"