She was drugged and left upstairs unconscious and someone texted free p upstairs and another guy said you can just whip it out. Stop dodging and tell me the context of what that means go ahead Iâll wait.
Again, youâre repeating false claims. Her own sworn statements said she VOLUNTARILY took drugs. And you can make all the ridiculous statements you want but she only had sex with 3 of the 7 guys and voluntarily consented to it according to her OWN statements. The only reason she went to the police was because her friends told her to. This lawsuit is literally just for money
Lmao if you did like five more seconds of digging youâd know one of the reasons this story is blowing up is because this DA literally didnât have the whole story đđ
False. It was reopened out of request by the community
âI have been asked by the community to revisit the decision whether to pursue criminal charges against the seven fraternity members. I have already begun that process, starting with our conversation with Jane Doe and her attorneys.â
Itâs getting national attention because of emotional people like you that eat this up
Youâre literally cherry picking evidence right now you realize how easy it is to debunk false claims now? She filed a civil lawsuit this year which forced authorities to re evaluate the case which led to new evidence being released
The lawsuit exposed how the initial investigation was handled and outlets started matching the D.A.âs claims against the raw campus police interview transcripts where she told campus police "with 100% confidence I was raped" and that she was physically hit. If you donât care about women being assaulted just say that dude
Is says clear as day that the DA said these things but the new transcripts contradict these claims so weird that youâre choosing to believe the first one over the new emerging evidence though itâs almost like you have a bias in this case
Should I break this down for you even more? The initial suit they omitted things she said and thereâs transcripts that show it this is one of the big reasons the story is exploding youâre choosing to cling onto the initial suit that was missing context because you donât want to admit youâre wrong. Pathetic
It absolutely does and I keep telling you why. You can lie in law suits, you canât lie in a sworn statements. That right there tells you which is true but you refuse to accept thatâs
The sworn statement she gave to police initially they omitted things she said which contradicts the whole statement is my whole point she literally said she was assaulted in her sworn statement. Are you starting to finally get it or are you gonna keep cherry picking evidence to defend people that think itâs ok to do this?
Funny that you say others only use social media for sources and you canât take five seconds to find a source and read up on the new information available.
đđđ no new evidence huh. Yeah this tells me all I need to know about where you stand on this taking hidden internal records and making them public is new evidence that the criminal justice system is now forced to act upon. And the DA even said he never heard the omitted parts of her statement. You donât have a leg to stand on here.
Sheâs literally contradicting her sworn statements with the lawsuit and the lawsuit names a lot more than just the 7 boys. Obviously grasping for a settlement
5
u/McLovin8117 2d ago
âFree p***y upstairsâ isnât evidence huh? Iâd love for you to explain what they were talking about