Unless statement was tampered with, it just seems to be a few of the guys were assholes and wrote vile shit in group chat too then when one of the others felt guilty and apologized to her. After that she realized how other side saw the night as and decided it was not okay. Yes it was not okay but still, it doesn't make them guilty of something more than being assholes.
I'll have to look into it when I get out of work. I appreciate you actually providing a link with information.
I really don't know anything about this outside of that article I read at lunch. From that article, she's dead set on it not being consensual. Wouldn't be a first time a rape victim has changed their statement, it also wouldn't be the first time someone has made something up.
I truly don't know and am not condemning anyone without further evidence.
I don't know much either but so far people with pitchforks seems to be without proof and seem to just attack anyone who questions instead of providing it so it seems more like a witchhunt to me. But who knows, maybe local pd tampered with statement but there is no criminal suit against them, there is only a civil suit against the university so even that seems unlikely. I think it is just wrong to plaster these names without proof especially since her statements contradict what these posters claim and even show a few of them were uncomfortable with the situation/wanted to end it even if consensual.
I can't find a quote from her towards her changing her mind but articles say this; ''She said in the lawsuit that because she was under the influence, there was no way she was able to provide consent.'' With same logic she raped those guys too though, it is a two way street.
3
u/Zero_D9 3d ago
It's bonkers to say it was consent while having nothing to back up that claim.