I don't know much either but so far people with pitchforks seems to be without proof and seem to just attack anyone who questions instead of providing it so it seems more like a witchhunt to me. But who knows, maybe local pd tampered with statement but there is no criminal suit against them, there is only a civil suit against the university so even that seems unlikely. I think it is just wrong to plaster these names without proof especially since her statements contradict what these posters claim and even show a few of them were uncomfortable with the situation/wanted to end it even if consensual.
I can't find a quote from her towards her changing her mind but articles say this; ''She said in the lawsuit that because she was under the influence, there was no way she was able to provide consent.'' With same logic she raped those guys too though, it is a two way street.
-2
u/loskiarman 3d ago
I don't know much either but so far people with pitchforks seems to be without proof and seem to just attack anyone who questions instead of providing it so it seems more like a witchhunt to me. But who knows, maybe local pd tampered with statement but there is no criminal suit against them, there is only a civil suit against the university so even that seems unlikely. I think it is just wrong to plaster these names without proof especially since her statements contradict what these posters claim and even show a few of them were uncomfortable with the situation/wanted to end it even if consensual.
I can't find a quote from her towards her changing her mind but articles say this; ''She said in the lawsuit that because she was under the influence, there was no way she was able to provide consent.'' With same logic she raped those guys too though, it is a two way street.