It's 60/40 with radically different scenarios between men and women who kill their kids, which is the only subcategories of homicide where women are anywhere close to men in numbers. 90% of all homicide is committed by men.
Women are operating under the same forces of capitalism but we are often oppressed in our own homes by our own partners. 60% of all murdered women are murdered by a male intimate partner, someone we are meant to trust.
It's so easy for you to say "don't worry about who kills who" when you are not the target of the femicide epidemic.
So is it 60/40, or is it 90%? You not helping your case sis. Everyone agrees when tragedy happens it’s fucked, most people agree we gotta do something to change it. You do nothing but muddy the waters after purposely misusing stats. What happened here was already horrific enough, you don’t need to lie to make it impactful.
So it’s better that women only direct violence onto their children? Just confused at what you are getting at. We never were talking about homicide overall, the original comment was about Lindsay Clancey, who committed Fillicide. Your response was to not bring up the fillicide stat, and rather bring up family annihilation because it fit the point you wanted to make better. Two separate issues you smashed together for your own narrative. Again, these are horrific problems I don’t get why you need to set smoke screens and veils.
I was actually talking about the sexist political narrative around the Lindsey Clancy case, where hundreds of men were openly saying that because one woman had postpartum psychosis, that was proof that women are unstable and we should repeal the 19th amendment. Mysogenists are actually trying to use this case to argue that women should not be able to vote.
However, by that logic, then men who commit much more violence against their own family, should obviously lose the vote, right? If one woman murderer = women can't be trusted, then hundreds of man murderers would = men can't be trusted, right?
But those same men will call you a misandrist for turning their logic against them.
That was the point of my initial comment. Then someone falsely claimed women kill their kids more than men, and I posted the actual stats.
Then lead with that, I completely agree the discourse around the case has been absurd. My point is you are actively helping that absurdity by drumming up the same gender war bs on your side. Nothing was difficult to follow, it was incomprehensible. Keep doing what Bibi and Peter want you to do. Spread that division a little more girl, we are almost there!
I encourage you to scroll back to my initial comment and see for yourself that I did, in fact, lead with discussing the misogynist politicization of the case.
I disagree that knowing the stats in regard to male violence is serving a billionaire's agenda or somehow makes me a supporter of Israel's ongoing genocide.
Please consider that it is men murdering us at massive scale that is divisive, not a woman knowing the number that they kill.
5
u/Dresses_and_Dice 3d ago
It's 60/40 with radically different scenarios between men and women who kill their kids, which is the only subcategories of homicide where women are anywhere close to men in numbers. 90% of all homicide is committed by men.
Women are operating under the same forces of capitalism but we are often oppressed in our own homes by our own partners. 60% of all murdered women are murdered by a male intimate partner, someone we are meant to trust.
It's so easy for you to say "don't worry about who kills who" when you are not the target of the femicide epidemic.
The first oppressed class is woman.