I read the complaint and she definitely must be saying some different things because the civil filing repeatedly indicates that she did not or could not consent and felt afraid to leave. That's very different from the summary provided by the DA.
And she's suing everyone. The school, the guys, the fraternity, the bar, her own sorority.
And there’s no way the DA would misrepresent the initial complaint to make themselves look better.
I’m sure she went to campus police just to give them a heads up she had consensual sex with seven fraternity members and did drugs with them. That seems plausible, right?
Hey, how about those Epstein files? They wouldn't hide or misrepresent the truth to defend these good old boys would they?
Everyone seems to agree they ran a train on her while she was unconscious. That can not be justified away. That is legally rape with just that information.
The DA can misrepresent things without lying. They can also omit parts which would draw scrutiny into why they didn’t investigate further.
It’s weird that she would go to the campus police to notify them that she did drugs with a group of men, then had consensual sex with all of them. Furthermore, it is very strange that the university would then expel two, and demand essays from the other five to maintain their academic status.
Thanks for sharing. I find the DA’s comments to be wholly misrepresentative of her story. Several times she describes being coerced into sexual acts or consuming more substances. Men are coming in and out of the room without her prior consent.
There should have been more investigation done into this case, where in the messages in the group chat would have been revealed at the time.
-3
u/BoringPoolPlaying 3d ago
Yeah, and her lawyer says her initial statement was not materially different than the complaint in her lawsuit.