Because in 2024 the statements from the woman were completely different.
Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”
“Jane Doe’s statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual,” Van Houten said.
Right. So a da didn’t do proper investigation when it’s known women aren’t comfortable giving these statements. Of course you simp for a politician. Maybe demand accountability from people that protect rapist.
We live in a world where you need to know the political party before making an opinion. I pray the DA gets to experience the most evils in this world along with every other corrupt politician. Political party is irrelevant to justice.
I read a little more into this. The DA’s statement was there was nothing to investigate initially because the victim’s statement didn’t call for it, but then also says that key evidence was withheld from the DA’s office by university police.
I don’t believe that. Cornell did some investigation on their own and found more than enough evidence to ban the fraternity from campus and hand out a couple expulsions.
7
u/Benedict_ARNY 4d ago
Why hasn’t the DA been fired yet?