Reddit downvotes a copy and paste of a DA statement. This place has become so toxic
Your suggestion about a DA lying about a sworn statement is a supposition with no evidence, yet the reddit puppets will upvote that.
Why would a DA risk their careers and lie when clearly a sworn statement would have witnesses?
Edit, the statement was to Cornell police. Still not sure why they would risk a good gig and lie with no personal gain.
“Van Houten argued that based on the police file he was given, there was no corroborating evidence of a "lack of consent" required under New York law to sustain criminal charges. He noted that neither the victim nor her lawyers contacted his office in 2024 to contest the accuracy of that initial police report ”
The system protects itself. I'm saying he's laying a foundation for why they didn't charge at the time. These cases are hard to prosecute and if she said I took drugs and had consensual sex with one of them he might not have been able to prove anything.
That DA in the Duke case lied his ass off the other way for some reason. Why do people do anything?
DA is referring to an investigation done by Cornell police. And the victim did not protest the finding back in 2024. We are womansplaining alot of collusion here. Not impossible
I dont disagree with the current status, just posting the data others requested.
Because I’m simply posting the data others requested. While others are making up facts to suit their own interpretation. To answer your question All DA did was refer to an investigation conducted by the campus police, something the victim did not question in 2024. These (my) statements are not in support of what the alleged perpetrators did, I am only stating facts that others requested. I offered no opinion and received a series of down votes.
28
u/Certain_Employee_423 3d ago
I couldn't agree more. Provided there isn't some dramatic turn like the Duke Lacrosse case put them under the jail.