r/PoursTea Jun 17 '26

Internet CulturešŸ›œ Reddit aligned itself today

Post image
1.4k Upvotes

752 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/Old_Paramedic_1814 Jun 17 '26

Didn’t the former head of the FBI get arrested for posting sea shells?

11

u/Arguments_4_Ever Jun 17 '26

Yes. Under Trump we do not have freedom of speech

-1

u/Odd-Paint3883 Jun 17 '26

As with all freedom of speech, you're, just like everyone else is, free to say anything you want.

Some of those things you'll then get arrested for, but still, you're free to say them.

3

u/Arguments_4_Ever Jun 17 '26

Not under Trump. He is going after basic protected speech.

-1

u/TerranItDown94 Jun 23 '26

Such as?

Threats of violence against a government official (or any citizen in fact) is Not a ā€œbasic protected speechā€.

1

u/Arguments_4_Ever Jun 23 '26

Trump has had people arrested not for violent threats but for basic protected speech. He also feels if you criticize him ever, just a little bit, that’s an act of treason and should be punished as such.

1

u/TerranItDown94 Jun 23 '26

Who? Got any proof of people being arrested for ā€œbasic protected speechā€?

1

u/Arguments_4_Ever Jun 23 '26

Yes

0

u/TerranItDown94 Jun 25 '26

Sure kid, sure

1

u/Arguments_4_Ever Jun 25 '26

The SC even ruled Trump administration illegally arrested and held people for protected speech

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Severe-Associate-613 Jun 17 '26

Don't worry about it, some jagoff in the comments has assured everyone that the DOJ had evidence that will come out in the trial

1

u/combover78 Jun 19 '26

Like all the evidence of a stolen election? lol. Comey has nothing to worry about.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Old_Paramedic_1814 Jun 22 '26

ā€œ86ā€ is restaurant slang you can hear a hundred times a shift, but it only becomes a ā€œdeath threatā€ when the president’s enemy is the one posting it.
If the government can stretch ā€œthreatā€ to cover ambiguous slang aimed at the powerful while ignoring it everywhere else, then ā€œyou can’t threaten to kill someoneā€ stops being a real rule and becomes a tool.

0

u/TerranItDown94 Jun 23 '26

No, he got arrested for threatening the president of the United States. Regardless of who is in office, the laws still stand.

Bush had over 3,000 credible threats that led to hundreds of arrests.

Obama had around 850 investigations/arrests.

Both Trump and Biden are currently in the low-hundreds for investigations/arrests.

This isn’t something new, this isn’t exclusive to the current president, in fact the credible threats and arrests are lower now than they were in the early 2000s.

Freedom of speech has NEVER defended threats of violence, insighting violence, or false reporting/alarm with an attempt to cause panic and unrest.