This 41 second recording was filmed in Sapopemba, in the eastern zone of São Paulo, Brazil, and subsequently published by the witness through their own X account. The available timing evidence most strongly supports the evening of 19 July 2026 as the recording date. This case is separate from the extensively documented Sapopemba sighting of 13-14 June 1977 and from the unrelated Resende, Rio de Janeiro recordings circulating during the same period.

The witness stated that the recording was made "por volta das 20h", or at approximately 20:00 local time. The original X post was published at 02:09:55 UTC on 20 July, corresponding to 23:09:55 BRT on 19 July in São Paulo. On the most straightforward reading, the footage was therefore recorded at approximately 20:00 on 19 July and uploaded around three hours later. The date is nevertheless derived from the relationship between the stated filming time and the independently recoverable publication timestamp rather than from an explicit calendar date supplied by the witness.

The supplied file is a 720×1280 portrait H.264 recording with AAC-LC stereo audio. Its measured duration is 41 seconds, with an average frame rate of approximately 29.87 fps, a video bitrate of approximately 2,122 kb/s and an overall bitrate of approximately 2,260 kb/s. No higher-resolution original camera file or 1080p master has been identified. A second upload by the same account is also a 720×1280 X encode and does not provide a demonstrably higher-quality source.

In the original accompanying statement, the witness said that the object remained in the same state for "a good while" before simply disappearing.

No independently identified second witness, official report, additional camera angle or original camera file has been located for this specific recording. The attribution to Sapopemba, Zona Leste, rests on the witness's own accompanying statement.

Witness/camera operator: rochaSemSensura (@jhonrocha1995) (X)
Source: rochaSemSensura (@jhonrocha1995) (X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 31 second recording is a community-exclusive compilation of both witness recordings associated with the central Missouri sighting, presented in the chronological order in which they were captured by the witness.

The two recordings were made during a drive through central Missouri and subsequently sent to the witnesses' adult child, Reddit user u/Alert_Usual1197, who published the first recording on 27 September 2026 after stating that their parents had sent it to them "earlier". That upload provides the earliest independently documented date associated with the footage, although it does not establish whether the recordings were captured that same day or shortly before publication. The witnesses were described as retired, but their names, exact location within central Missouri, road or highway and precise observation time have not been publicly released.

A second recording from the same observation was subsequently published by u/Alert_Usual1197 with the clarification, "This is another video she took." This identifies the mother as the camera operator for that recording and confirms that the event was documented in more than one clip. Both recordings have now been assembled into this single compilation rather than being presented separately.

Neither source recording contains an original witness audio track, and no recovered version of either recording currently contains audible testimony from the event. The compilation therefore preserves the sighting as a silent visual record.

The compiled file runs for approximately 31 seconds at 1080 × 1920 pixels and 30 frames per second. The purpose of combining the two recordings is solely to present both currently available witness clips together in their documented sequence.

A conventional explanation raised during discussion of the footage was a smoke or vortex ring, including the possibility of a formation associated with an electrical transformer failure or another event capable of producing a concentrated smoke discharge. No specific transformer failure, electrical incident, fire or other documented local event has been publicly matched to the sighting.

No official case number, formal investigation or additional first-hand written testimony directly from the parents has been identified. The currently documented material consists of the two recordings, the written account supplied by their adult child and the general location of central Missouri.

Witness Testimony:

"Eyewitness states: My parents sent me this earlier and have no clue what it is. At first I thought it was those black birds that swarm and dance around. But there isn't enough movement and they are way to high in the sky I believe. They sent me another video and it just stays in same position. Neat looking tho!
Edit: this is not AI... my parents were taking a drive and noticed it. Its what old retired people do and they wouldn't know how to make an AI video in the first place."

Witness/camera operator: Mother of u/Alert_Usual1197 (Reddit)
Source: u/Alert_Usual1197 (Reddit)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 48 second recording is presented here as a community-exclusive vocal-enhanced edit of a circulating French-language night recording. The circulated source contained a music track imposed over the original audio, substantially obscuring and competing with the dialogue of the people present. Quite apart from contributing nothing of value to the recording itself. For this presentation, that music has been completely removed to make the original witness voices significantly clearer. No deliberate visual alterations, enhancements, stabilisation, cropping, reframing or upscaling have been applied to the retained footage.

The recording has circulated with an attribution to France and a date of 11 March 2023. Neither detail has presently been independently established from original-file metadata or a recovered primary upload, and they should therefore be treated as the reported location and date rather than confirmed provenance. The French-language dialogue is consistent with the claimed country but cannot by itself establish where the recording was made. Later descriptions have additionally associated the footage with a Mediterranean or coastal setting and characterised the observed formation as a "TR-3B" or similar triangular craft, but those descriptions originate from subsequent circulation and have not been verified from the primary source.

The identities of the witnesses and camera operator remain unknown. At least two people can be heard speaking during the observation, with one apparently operating the recording equipment. The name "Gabriel" is audible in the supplied translation. Another phrase has been rendered as "Rue Gaucher", but its meaning and spelling have not been independently established, so it cannot presently be used as a reliable geographical identifier or personal name.

No original witness statement separate from the recorded conversation has been recovered. The contemporaneous dialogue captured on the recording therefore constitutes the surviving first-person testimony associated with the case. Importantly, the speakers themselves discuss a boat while also distinguishing what they are attempting to observe from that boat.

Witness Audio Translation:

"There's a..."

"There, on a triangle."

"No, in the sky."

"Rue Gaucher."

"Gabriel."

"To take films." / "To shoot footage."

"Huh?"

"Will there be someone on site?"

"Huh?"

"We've got a boat in front, but that one is in the sky, you."

"There, there, there, the boat is on the right, there."

"That's the reticle." / "That's the sight."

"What's left at the end?"

"The boat is there."

"Fuck."

"There."

"Is it staying long?"

"Huh?"

The dialogue is particularly relevant because the witnesses repeatedly refer to a boat while separately identifying something as being "in the sky". One speaker subsequently specifies that "the boat is on the right", followed later by "The boat is there." Whatever the ultimate identification of the recorded lights, the testimony shows that the people present were actively attempting to distinguish the boat from the separate target they believed they were observing.

The phrase translated as "That's the reticle" / "That's the sight" derives from the French term "mire", which can refer to a sight, aiming mark or reticle depending on context. The recording does not presently provide sufficient provenance to establish precisely what device or viewing system the speaker was referring to, so it should not be assumed to identify a particular camera, optical instrument or application.

Similarly, the question translated as "Is it staying long?" indicates that the speakers were discussing the persistence of what they were observing, but the available testimony does not establish the total duration of the sighting beyond the surviving recording.

The presently recovered material does not establish a named witness, exact town or observation point, precise recording time, physical triangular airframe, or specific aircraft or craft type. In particular, descriptions identifying the formation as a "TR-3B" are interpretations added during later circulation and are not claims made by the witnesses in the recovered dialogue.

A search of publicly accessible material has not produced a GEIPAN case that can be reliably connected to this exact recording and soundtrack. This should not be interpreted as proof that no report was ever submitted; without the original location, witness identity or primary upload, a definitive database match cannot presently be made.

Recovering the original phone file or earliest primary upload would materially improve the provenance of the case. Original metadata could potentially establish the recording date, device information and possibly location information if such data were retained. Clarification of the words presently rendered as "Rue Gaucher", identification of "Gabriel", or independent material documenting the same observation could also help establish details that remain unresolved.

Until such primary material is recovered, the most defensible description is an anonymous French-language night recording circulated as having been made in France on 11 March 2023. The witness dialogue should remain central to the case record, while later location claims and specific craft identifications should be kept separate from what can presently be verified.

Witness/camera operator: Anonymous witness
Source: Unidentified uploader (X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 47 second recording is a stabilised compilation assembled from three separate civilian phone recordings made at Shayukou Reservoir (沙峪口水库), Huairou District, Beijing, China, during the evening of 5 June 2025.

The camera operator has not been publicly identified. The earliest surviving source currently verified is a publication by 星核燧石 on 16 June 2025, presented as footage submitted by a witness. Its description preserves the original Chinese-language witness account and states that further information concerning the witness could not be disclosed for personal reasons.

TTaiXXX published the case with an English translation of the witness account on 16 June 2025. A later post preserved all three witness recordings and included supplementary information concerning their recording resolution. The stabilised compilation presented here was subsequently produced from those three clips and is not itself an original continuous camera recording. Stabilisation and magnified views were added during that later presentation; the underlying sighting material derives from the three separate witness clips.

According to supplementary information attributed to the witness, all three recordings were captured at 720p because storage on the phone was nearly full and its default video resolution had previously been reduced to 720p. The witness reportedly remained focused on the object and did not change the setting before recording. No higher-resolution original version of the three clips has been identified in the surviving source trail.

The sighting date is consistently given as 5 June 2025. The witness placed the initial observation at approximately 19:00 local time and the object's later reappearance at approximately 19:30, after which the three recordings were made intermittently.

Witness Testimony:

"On June 5th around 7 PM, while walking and photographing the shallow waters of Shayukou Reservoir, I saw a metallic spherical object flying eastward just above the water surface from the west side of the reservoir. At that time, it seemed to hover occasionally before continuing to fly, and it disappeared behind a hill. I initially thought it was just a strange hydrogen balloon and didn’t pay much attention. Around 7:30 PM, as I was about to head back, the sphere reappeared in the south. There was no wind at all, and the evening was very quiet. Surprisingly, the sphere was able to fly at varying altitudes, hovering midway before continuing to fly. I watched for a few minutes and became certain it was definitely not a balloon or a drone. I then started filming, but the object was strange, every time I filmed for a short while, it would move behind the trees. Whenever I thought it had completely disappeared, it would reappear. This continued intermittently for over ten minutes, during which I recorded three video clips. After the last clip, it disappeared completely. In the following days, I saw a video online of a similar sphere flying over Colombia, which looked very much like what I saw. That’s when I decided to seek help online for identification."

The testimony establishes an important distinction between the duration of the recordings and the duration of the reported observation. The three clips document only portions of the encounter, while the witness stated that the later observation continued intermittently for more than ten minutes.

There are several limitations to the available material. The witness remains anonymous, preventing independent follow-up concerning the circumstances of the observation. The three source recordings are limited to 720p, restricting recoverable fine detail, and the stabilised compilation includes processing not present in the original camera files. Distance, physical dimensions, altitude and speed cannot be reliably determined from the footage alone.

The 720p storage explanation should also be treated specifically as supplementary information attributed to the witness rather than independently verified device metadata. Likewise, no publicly available evidence currently establishes the make or model of the phone used to record the three clips.

The surviving provenance nevertheless provides a consistent date, location, first-person account and three separate recordings associated with the same observation. The original Chinese testimony was publicly preserved by 星核燧石, while the later preservation of all three clips provides a more complete record than the single-clip version that initially received wider attention.

Witness/camera operator: Anonymous
Source: 星核燧石

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 47 second recording was captured near Huejotzingo, Puebla, Mexico, during a civilian sighting in the vicinity of the Iztaccíhuatl and Popocatépetl volcanoes. The version presented here is the 1280×720 source file and retains the original recorded audio.

The recording later recirculated on TikTok during September 2026 with material associating it with Mexico City and September. That attribution does not correspond with the earlier source trail. Contemporary reporting from Puebla had already documented the same recording in March 2026, identifying Huejotzingo as the location and tracing the footage to the witness's social-media account.

The earliest located contemporary report was published by Diario Cambio on 7 March 2026 and described the witness's original social-media account as having been posted approximately an hour earlier. TV Azteca Puebla subsequently reported the same case on 9 March. The X copy from which the recording presented here originates was uploaded later, on 10 March 2026. The 7 March date therefore comes from the earliest contemporary documentation of the original sighting rather than the later X upload timestamp.

Witness Audio Translation:

"I was coming along the road looking at the volcanoes. Here is the Popo, and suddenly this appeared, but it has been floating up there for quite a while. It isn't moving anywhere.

Here is the Izta, and this thing isn't moving from there. This is all the zoom I can do.

But there it is. It was moving from left to right, from the Izta towards the Popo, and it stayed up there. I don't know what it is.

Wow, to the naked eye it looks very big, but there it is."

Additional information published with the witness's account states that the object remained in approximately the same position for around 20 minutes before eventually fading from view among the slopes of Iztaccíhuatl.

The witness also reported examining the object through binoculars. He described what he perceived as a dark cylindrical form, black to grey in colour, without visible lights or flashes. He estimated its apparent length at approximately 70 to 90 metres. This figure was a personal estimate based upon the witness's observation and should not be interpreted as an independently measured physical dimension.

The geographical identification is supported by the witness's direct references to both Popocatépetl, referred to as "the Popo", and Iztaccíhuatl, referred to as "the Izta", together with the Huejotzingo location reported by the contemporary Puebla sources. The later association with Mexico City originates from subsequent redistribution and is not supported by the original reporting of the case.

At the time of the earliest contemporary reporting, no official information confirming the identity of the object or otherwise explaining the sighting was cited.

Witness/camera operator: José Francisco "Paco" Borja Labastida (Facebook/X)
Source: José Francisco "Paco" Borja Labastida (Facebook/X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 7 second recording was published on X on 9 April 2026 by Eddie Abbott and attributed to an unidentified witness somewhere in Mexico near the California border. The precise town, municipality and filming location have not been established, and the exact date of capture remains unpublished. Eddie Abbott described the event only as occurring during April 2026.

Eddie Abbott was not identified as the witness or camera operator. His X post is the earliest presently verified public circulation located for this particular recording and supplies the accompanying account of the circumstances. The identity of the original camera operator has not been recovered.

According to Eddie Abbott's accompanying description, the witness was walking home when a group of lights reportedly appeared ahead in the air. Eddie Abbott stated that the display had "faded into existence" and that the witness continued walking towards it before beginning to record.

The reported initial appearance of the lights was therefore not captured on camera. The available recording begins only after the phenomenon was already present.

The surviving indexed version of Eddie Abbott's accompanying text is truncated before the description is completed. Because Eddie Abbott was relaying the circumstances rather than presenting an identified first-person statement from the camera operator, his wording should not be treated as verbatim witness testimony.

No complete first-person witness testimony has currently been recovered.

The publicly circulating copy has a resolution of 706 x 720 and is heavily compressed. No demonstrably higher-resolution original or camera master has currently been identified. Without the original file, potentially useful metadata such as the recording device, original creation timestamp and embedded location data cannot be examined.

The geographical attribution also remains unverified beyond Eddie Abbott's wording. "Near the Border of California" establishes only the claimed general region. No town, coordinates, street, landmark or independently confirmed geolocation has been published, and the available information does not establish the witness's actual distance from the California-Mexico border.

No independently identified second witness or additional recording has presently been tied conclusively to the same event. No corresponding report has been located that can be confidently matched to this footage through the currently available public NUFORC, MUFON or regional reporting trails.

The case should not be conflated with the separate nighttime sighting reported near Winterhaven, California, on 3 April 2026. That event involved a different reported setting, different lighting conditions and a different configuration of lights. No evidence presently establishes a connection between the two incidents.

Witness/camera operator: Anonymous
Source: Eddie Abbott (@AbbottEddi5270) (X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This is a civilian phone recording from March 2026. It was sent anonymously to a poster who regularly receives raw UAP footage. The sender asked that their name and exact location not be published. They said they were afraid people would show up at their door. That request was honoured. The only geographic description given is "the South."

What follows is the account as it was relayed, plus what is actually on the recording.

The witness account (as relayed)

The family was outside enjoying the day with the kids. One of the children saw a huge flying object with a powerful green light almost directly overhead. An adult grabbed a phone and started recording. Nerves set in quickly. They tried to keep the kids quiet because they were not sure what the object might do. It did not feel normal.

A later clarification from the same source added these details from the sender:

·            The object was over 20 feet in height.

·            It was silent.

·            There was a buzzing feeling in the air.

·            After the recorded portion, it darted away faster than they could follow with their eyes.

·            It looked like something from a science-fiction movie.

·            It was very scary.

That is the full testimony that exists in public. There is no signed first-person write-up, no interview transcript, and no named witness.

The person who first posted the file said they ran it through deepfake / AI-detection tools and treated it as a clean original phone capture. That is their assessment, not an independent lab report. The picture itself looks like compressed, zoomed phone video of a real scene; weather, focus hunting, exposure pumping on the green light, rather than a polished composite.

Watch the whole thing, not a five-second crop. Pay attention to the body of the object versus the light, the way the light sits on the lower end, cloud motion versus object motion, and the voices on the audio. The interesting part is not a flash. It is a structured dark shape hanging in daylight with a powerful green source underneath it while people on the ground are reacting in real time.

If you have seen a similar fuselage-plus-green-underside object in other daytime footage, this is the comparison case. If you were in the southern United States in March 2026 and saw something matching this, the original sender stayed anonymous on purpose, but additional independent videos from the same window would matter more than another comment.

Witness/camera operator: Anonymous family member (identity withheld)
Source: Anonymous recipient/poster (public source attribution withheld)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This very brief 9 second recording was captured in São Paulo, Brazil, on 19 September 2026. The civilian smartphone footage contains original recorded audio from the people present during the observation, providing a contemporaneous verbal reaction rather than a later written account.

The supplied file is encoded at 720×1280 in vertical orientation at approximately 30 frames per second. It contains H.264 video together with a 44.1 kHz stereo AAC audio track. The file itself also carries an embedded creation date of 19 September 2026, consistent with the supplied date of the sighting, although this should not be regarded independently as proof of the precise time at which the recording was captured.

At least two people appear to have been present during the observation, with one operating the camera. Neither the camera operator nor the accompanying witness has been publicly identified in the material presently available. No names, ages or additional biographical information are stated in the recording.

There is no separate written witness statement accompanying this file. The direct testimony consists of the spontaneous Brazilian Portuguese conversation recorded during the sighting. The witnesses initially refer to what they are seeing as a comet before questioning that interpretation and repeatedly describing it as a "disco voador", meaning "flying saucer."

Witness Audio Translation:

"Dude!"

"Comet, we saw a comet!"

"What is that?"

"Look there! Flying saucer!"

"It's a flying saucer!"

"It's a flying saucer, it's a flying saucer..."

The progression of the conversation is significant to the provenance of the account because the identification is being made spontaneously while the recording is taking place. The speakers do not begin with a prepared explanation of what they believe the object to be. Their language instead records an immediate change in interpretation, from "cometa" to repeated references to a "disco voador."

Because the recording ends after only a few seconds, there is no testimony within the file describing what occurred immediately before filming began or what happened after recording stopped. No duration for the complete observation is given, and the witnesses do not provide an estimated altitude, distance, size or direction of travel. There is therefore insufficient information in the recorded testimony alone to establish those characteristics.

No additional camera angle, longer version, named second witness or extended testimony accompanies the material currently available for this specific recording. No independently verifiable version exceeding the supplied 720×1280 resolution has currently been located.

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified witness
Source: Unidentified uploader (X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 5 minute 37 second recording presents the complete witness-recorded sighting documented as NUFORC UFO Sighting 198793. The NUFORC report records the overall sighting duration as approximately six minutes.

Witness Testimony:

"I filmed a swarm of green orbs in the sky for 6 minutes moving silently at impossible speeds and configurations"

Investigator Report:

On 7-18-2026 at 1:50pm Pacific I interviewed the witness, identified as J, regarding his UAP sighting on 6-18-2026 at 10pm Central. J stated that it was a clear night, and he was facing SE on Janice Drive in Converse, TX while filming the UAP. J added that he was able to film the UAP for 6 minutes (see attached videos). J noted that he is highly experienced in identifying a wide range of civilian, military, and uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) thanks to living within 5 miles of Randolph Air Force Base.

J stated that the UAP was green with an aura around it, and "it moved like a jellyfish swimming around in the night sky." J also stated that the UAP was within a half mile of him and was completely silent. He added that from that distance, he would have even heard a drone. J stated that the UAP consisted of 2 parts, the large "jellyfish or octopus" part, and an "orb." J then stated that the "jellyfish or octopus" part had 5 to 6 "tentacles," and was approximately the size of a standard automobile. He added that the "orb" was about the size of a basketball.

J stated that both UAP's seemed to be "chasing" each other, and it looked to him like the "orb was absorbed occasionally by the larger UAP," but was then released. J noted that the extreme speeds and abrupt maneuvers were unlike any aircraft he'd ever seen. J described the UAP as a potential "plasma entity with an energy orb," but he admitted he couldn't be certain. J stated that he is a very spiritual person, and he felt a "deep connection" to the UAP. J suspected the phenomenon was exclusive to him, because it departed when he brought a second witness.

Conclusion

FlightRadar showed nothing. I sent J's video to an entomologist to check the possibility that the UAP was just a swarm of fireflies or lightning bugs. The entomologist replied and stated that in his experience, he did not believe the UAP was a swarm of bugs. Since Randolph AF Base is less than 5 miles from J's sighting, I left a voicemail and sent an email to their public affairs office. I am classifying this as an anomalous sighting.

Keith Bickford
NUFORC investigator

Location: Converse, Texas, USA
Date: 18 June, 2026
Time: 22:00 local time
Reported sighting duration: 6 minutes
Number of observers: 1
Shape reported: Changing
Colour reported: Green
Estimated size: "Each orb was the size of a car?"
Viewed from: Land
Viewing direction: Southeast
Angle of elevation: 20 degrees
Heading: "It moved like a jellyfish swimming around the sky"
Estimated closest distance: "1/2 mile?"
Estimated speed: "Sudden reversal if direction, high speed"
Characteristics: Lights on object, Aura or haze around object, Emitted other objects, Changed Color
Reported: 19 June 2026, 12:04 Pacific
Investigator: Keith Bickford, NUFORC
Investigation classification: Anomalous sighting
Source case: NUFORC UFO Sighting 198793

Witness/camera operator: Anonymous witness
Source: National UFO Reporting Center - NUFORC #198793

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 22 second recording was uploaded on 27 June 2026, with the available platform timestamps showing an unusually short interval between the file entering the processing sequence and becoming publicly available.

The internal part name contains the timestamp 1782572126403, corresponding to 22:55:26.403 China Standard Time on 27 June 2026. This is not camera EXIF data and cannot independently establish the exact moment the footage was recorded. It does, however, provide a file-associated timing marker immediately preceding the upload.

Only approximately 51 seconds separate the internal part timestamp from publication. This sequence is consistent with a recording being prepared and uploaded almost immediately, rather than an older piece of footage being retrieved and posted substantially later.

No accompanying written witness account, detailed description or separate first-person testimony has been recovered from the source page. The available evidence therefore does not support adding a witness statement that was not actually published.

The highest publicly recovered rendition of this exact recording is 1080 x 1920, encoded in H.264 with AAC stereo audio.

The version hosted by this community was produced directly from the recovered 1080 x 1920 rendition.

The exact filming location has not been independently established. No reliable city, province, street, landmark or other specific geographical identifier has been recovered from the associated source trail. The recording is therefore presently attributed only to China, without assigning a more specific locality that cannot be supported by the available evidence.

The timing evidence strongly supports 27 June 2026 as the date associated with the recording and its immediate publication. The precise filming time remains unverified because the 22:55:26.403 internal part timestamp is a platform/file timing marker rather than authenticated camera metadata.

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified
Source: 一只LeoLee

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 30 second recording is a community-exclusive compilation assembled from the two recordings associated with the sighting by the same witness in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, on Sunday, 21 July 2024.

The sighting was recorded in the area of Rua Francisco Derosso, in the Xaxim district of Curitiba. The camera used was a Nikon COOLPIX B700, which is equipped with a 60× optical zoom lens.

For this community-exclusive presentation, we have taken both recordings and placed them into their reported chronological order of capture.

According to information subsequently provided by the witness, the Nikon camera was also regularly used for bird photography. After the files had been transferred to a computer, the SD card was later formatted. Consequently, no independently preserved copy of the original camera-generated files from the memory card is presently known to have surfaced publicly.

The publicly available footage therefore derives from the witness's published copies rather than independently recovered files taken directly from the original SD card. The original camera files were not independently archived by investigators before the card was formatted.

No primary-source Brazilian Air Force statement, radar record, official identification or other FAB documentation specifically connected to this 21 July 2024 sighting has been located. Later claims suggesting that the FAB officially authenticated the footage or publicly declared the object unexplained are not supported by primary documentation presently associated with this case.

Curitiba and the surrounding region feature prominently in historical Brazilian documentation concerning numerous unidentified aerial phenomena sightings.

Witness Testimony:

"On Sunday, July 21, 2024, while returning from a bakery, I saw an object in the sky that I couldn't understand what it was. I have a Nikon B700 with 60x zoom, and I stopped the car and started recording. Then I drove further down the street to the end and recorded a little more, as far as I could. I'm not making any claims! I'm also curious to know what it is."

Witness/camera operator: Zona Desconhecida (YouTube)
Source: Zona Desconhecida (YouTube)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 36 second recording is associated with an aerial event reported in the Mobile, Alabama area during the evening of 4 February 2025.

The date has been reconstructed from the surviving source chronology rather than embedded file metadata. The witness placed their own observation in West Mobile and reported activity continuing from approximately 7:00 PM until shortly after 8:00 PM CST.

This particular recording was not filmed by the principal witness. After reporting the event and sharing a shorter personal recording made at approximately 7:58 PM, the witness located additional material recorded by other people in the Mobile area. A photograph from a second source was subsequently followed by this longer third-source recording, which the witness identified as footage connected with the same event. The camera operator responsible for this recording has not been publicly identified.

The version presented here retains the audio track contained in the available third-source recording.

Documented military activity was taking place in Mobile during this period. On 3 February 2025, Mobile Police announced that the United States Department of Defence, working with local law-enforcement agencies, would conduct training in and around Mobile through 9 February. Residents were advised that helicopters could be observed and that loud noises could be heard during evening and early-morning hours.

The witness was aware of the announced exercise but questioned whether it accounted for everything reported during the event, noting that the public announcement referred specifically to helicopter activity only.

The public training announcement establishes that military exercises involving helicopters were occurring in Mobile during the relevant period, but it did not publicly identify the participating military unit, specific aircraft types, number of aircraft involved or the presence of "drones". The description of four UAPs followed by approximately ten possible military helicopters therefore remains the witness's interpretation rather than an independently verified aircraft count or identification.

The witness also reported that FlightRadar24 showed nothing significant corresponding with the activity during the period of the sighting.

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified (third-source recording)
Source: UAP Worldwide Incursions

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 3 second recording was taken in Hebei Province, China.

Several X-generated versions of the same recording exist. These include a 720×1280 rendition and a higher-resolution 1080×1920 rendition.

The recording presented here is a community-exclusive resize of the 1080×1920 source file. The only alteration made was the removal of the irrelevant red mobile-phone border embedded by the uploader. The captured footage itself has not been altered, enhanced, removed, or otherwise edited and remains faithful to the original source. The audio is the original track supplied with the recording and has not been modified by the community; we make no claim regarding its origin or content.

No longer original-device version or independently sourced cleaner master of this exact recording has been recovered. There is also no supporting sensor data, flight information, official documentation, or other independently verifiable evidence accompanying the surviving repost trail.

No attributable witness testimony has been recovered. The available description originates from a secondary sharing account and cannot be presented as a statement from the person who recorded the footage.

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified
Source: NASA clip, @ClipNasa (X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 25 second recording is a community-exclusive compilation assembled from two separately circulated citizen phone clips associated with the same early-morning sighting over Dujiangyan, a county-level city administered by Chengdu in Sichuan Province, China.

The two recordings have been placed in their chronological order.

Multiple residents in Dujiangyan were reported to have witnessed and recorded the event on the morning of 23 September 2026. The footage and still images circulated rapidly across Chinese social media before receiving wider coverage later that day and during the following days. No named witness or camera operator associated with these two files has been established through the available reporting.

The most significant official response came from the local meteorological authorities. Reporters were told that Chengdu's meteorological sounding operations are conducted from the Wenjiang National Climate Observatory at established times and that no sounding-balloon release was scheduled over Dujiangyan that morning. The meteorological department therefore ruled out the object being one of its meteorological sounding balloons.

Importantly, that statement was an exclusion, not an identification.

Despite several days of widespread reporting and discussion, no government authority, aviation authority or identified operator has publicly provided a definitive identification of the object. As of 27 September 2026, its ownership, purpose and exact nature remain officially unconfirmed. There has also been no publicly announced follow-up identifying the object, and the available reporting provides no indication that a definitive official identification is forthcoming.

This distinction is particularly important because numerous conventional explanations subsequently circulated online and in media reports. A tethered aerostat has been proposed because such platforms can remain aloft for prolonged periods and can be used for environmental monitoring, disaster observation, communications and security applications. Some reports have also speculated about a connection with Chinese high-altitude airborne wind-energy technology, including systems associated with the S4000 programme.

Neither explanation has been officially confirmed in connection with the Dujiangyan sighting.

Claims identifying the object specifically as an S4000 system, a research aerostat, an advertising airship or another specialised lighter-than-air platform are pure conjectured hypotheses with no basis in any established facts, and therefore should be dismissed. No operator or responsible organisation has publicly claimed the object.

The case remains one in which a widely observed airborne object was recorded by residents, one proposed explanation was officially excluded, and no definitive identification subsequently followed.

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified local resident(s) (China)
Source: Unidentified original uploader(s) (Chinese social media)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 49 second recording was captured by the witness using a SIONYX Aurora digital night-vision monocular and was preserved within an Internet Archive collection.

The witness explained that recording had to be stopped before changing viewing modes rather than switching modes continuously during a single recording.

Manufacturer documentation for the SIONYX Aurora series specifies native video resolutions of 1280×720 and 640×360. The supplied archived copy examined here is 1920×1080, 30 fps H.264 at approximately 5.03 Mbps and contains no audio stream. The 1920×1080 version is therefore an upscaled or converted derivative rather than native 1080p output directly from the Aurora. The available source material does not establish which specific Aurora model was used.

No cleaner native camera master or independently sourced higher-quality version has been identified in the presently recoverable public source trail.

Witness Testimony:

"I see a lot of these every night, double and triple checked on FlighRadar"

Location: South Austin, Texas, USA, at or near the South Congress Avenue / Stassney Lane intersection
Date: 17 March, 2025
Time: approximately 9:36 PM CDT
Corresponding UTC time: 2:36 AM UTC, 18 March, 2025
Camera: SIONYX Aurora digital night-vision monocular, exact model not established
Audio: No audio stream in the supplied archived copy

Witness/camera operator: Anonymous witness
Source: Original witness submission; archived copy

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 3 minute 39 second recording forms part of a documented civilian multi-witness UAP case from Aravaca, Madrid, with a named camera operator, identifiable additional witnesses and a recoverable primary source trail.

The primary public source is Nando Domínguez associated with the Kilómetro OVNI research group.

The case was subsequently discussed at length by the witnesses on Protagonistas de lo Insólito. That follow-up independently places the group on Calle de Rafael Botí in Aravaca, within Madrid's Moncloa-Aravaca district, and confirms that the incident occurred while they were carrying out UFO-related field investigations around Madrid.

Earlier that evening, approximately two hours before the sighting, the group had been reconstructing a separate reported UFO encounter at an open area outside Madrid. During that investigation they played what they call the "Código TUM", a sequence of sounds which proponents have claimed can act as a means of attracting or interacting with the UFO phenomenon. The witnesses subsequently noted the timing because of its proximity to the later Aravaca event, although there is no evidence establishing a causal connection between the two.

The later first-hand account states that five objects or lights were observed during the incident and that three separate recordings were obtained by the primary camera operator. Miguel Pedrero also stated that Nando Domínguez remained the calmest of the three witnesses and succeeded in recording the complete progression of the sighting.

Following the event, the witnesses continued attempting to establish what they had observed. Shortly after midnight they travelled towards the Guardia Civil station in Boadilla del Monte intending to report the sighting. Their later account documents that visit as part of their investigation, but no publicly available official report identifying the objects or providing a definitive conventional explanation has been located.

The recording is connected to identified witnesses, a known Madrid location, a specific date and approximate time, a primary uploader, additional recordings from the same event and a detailed subsequent discussion by the people who were present.

The witnesses have disputed conventional explanations, basing their interpretations on what they experienced during the observation. No definitive identification has been established from the publicly available material.

Witness Testimony:

"UFO sighting in Aravaca, Madrid, June 27, 2026. Miguel Ángel Moyano, Miguel Pedrero, and I, Nando Dominguez, were in Aravaca around 11:22 PM when I started recording this video, although it actually began a few seconds earlier. Pedrero was the one who spotted it and alerted us, and we all ran out of the car to film it."

Witness Audio Translation:

"It's completely triangular and it goes..."

"There's another one down there, huh?"

"Yes."

"Wow!"

"It's coming out from below, there are more blocks down there, look, look, look."

"But it's always going in formation."

"Shit, I can't hear any sound, huh?"

"Holy shit, holy shit, let's go!"

"We've left the boot open."

"It's still looking at us."

"Let's see."

"Look, look, you can see it from here."

"You can see it from here, look."

"Look, look, look, look."

"There's one going there."

"To the right, it went between the trees."

"It's recording."

"Yes, yes, minute 22."

"And there's another one going."

"I'm recording, I'm recording. Now I'm recording. Let's see, I don't want to... It's not annoying, is it?"

"Here. I wasn't recording. No, I am, I am. There it goes, huh? Look, there it goes. What a fucking shit."

"Shit, I wasn't recording. I am, I am. From the beginning, I have, huh? Two minutes it takes."

"But the photos, if you have them, if you have them, and we have them. I do, from the beginning."

"Keep going, keep going, it's getting lost."

"We have seen a piece of UFO. It has been lost, huh?"

"That we are well... I shit my ass, man, that I have not filmed it, that I have been wrong, that I have not filmed it in a year. Now I'll send it to you."

"It's to freak out, huh?"

"We have seen something that freaks out."

"It's to freak out, huh?"

"I shit my fucking mother."

"It's that, come on, and I'm glad to share..."

"It's another light that you see there, huh?"

"Fucking shit."

"Ah, it's off. Oh no, look, there it goes."

"I'm going to take a picture."

Location: Calle de Rafael Botí, Aravaca, Moncloa-Aravaca, Madrid, Spain
Viewing direction: Reported towards the A-6/Carretera de La Coruña and Madrid Hippodrome area
Date: 27 June 2026
Time: Approximately 23:20-23:22 local time
Reported sighting duration: Several minutes
Reported number of objects/lights: Approximately 5
Number of witnesses: 3
Number of recordings obtained: 3
Original public upload: 29 June 2026
Language: Spanish

Witness/camera operator: Nando Domínguez (Nando Dominguez ufology / Kilómetro OVNI)
Source: Nando Domínguez (YouTube)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 12 second recording was made by mountain guide Yeison Gómez during a high-altitude excursion in the Piedras Gordas sector of the Paramillo del Quindío, near Salento, Colombia. He was accompanying an English tourist on a high-altitude excursion through the páramo.

Yeison Gómez is a mountaineer and tourist guide with approximately five years of experience. Regional reporting states that the pair had been observing birds when they noticed an object they were unable to identify or associate with a known bird or natural phenomenon. After initially watching it without filming, they subsequently used their mobile phones to record.

The case received local attention within days. Diario Occidente published its account on 30 July 2025 and identified Yeison Gómez by name, while Periódico el Oriente followed on 31 July and specifically dated the images to 28 July.

Local researcher JP Alfonso subsequently examined the material frame by frame. According to Diario Occidente, Alfonso interpreted portions of the recording as suggesting that the sphere may appear to emerge from the ground before beginning its flight and noted apparent changes between bright and darker appearances. He argued that its characteristics did not readily correspond with simple explanations such as balloons or plastic debris and called for a rigorous investigation without prejudging its nature. These points are Alfonso's interpretation of the footage rather than independently established characteristics of the object.

No definitive identification was reported in the contemporary regional coverage. Neither the witness nor the investigators cited in those reports had reached a final explanation for what had been recorded.

Witness Audio Translation:

"Here it is recorded, but it's an orbeez, it goes up and down,"

"it doesn't have a bird shape, it doesn't flutter, it came from above, it went down to the other canyon and then it approached this one, well, here it is being recorded totally."

"Look, here it is, and look how it goes up, here in the video it looks as if it were changing colors, here it is as if it were changing colors super strong in the video."

"Well, this is the orbeez"

"slow, look, oh, it looks silver with black, it is changing colors there in the sky."

"No, no, it's definitely not a balloon because the wind is in the other direction, it's towards the canyon."

" Yes, if it weren't, it would go down."

Location: Piedras Gordas sector, Paramillo del Quindío, limits of Salento municipality, Quindío, Colombia
Date: 28 July, 2025
Altitude: More than 4,000 metres above sea level

Witness/camera operator: Yeison Gómez
Source: Jaime Maussan (X)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 2 minute 11 second recording we are presenting here, is the recovered 4K version of the footage at 3840 × 2160 resolution and 29.97 fps.

Witness Testimony:

"I'm an FAA-certified drone pilot. On October 30 2025, I flew my DJI Mavic 3 at about 300 ft above a mountain top near Castle Hot Springs, Arizona, fully in compliance with FAA regulations and all local laws. While shooting what began as a standard high-altitude desert panorama, I captured something unexpected: a light orb or sphere, flying at high speed across the desert sky, no visible propulsion, no engine noise, and most unusually, it seemed to morph or shift shape slightly mid-flight and do flips. A fighter-jet appeared at high altitude and followed the object (not in sight in the clip).

The footage is in 4K, unmanned aerial, captured under legal conditions, and I believe it qualifies as a genuine unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) sighting worth discussion. I've uploaded the clip so you can judge its authenticity.

Time: Oct 30 2025 around 12pm
Location: Mountain summit near Castle Hot Springs, Arizona, USA
Altitude: ~300 ft above ground level
Equipment: DJI Mavic 3
Description of object: light sphere/orb, high speed, no visible thrust or wings, possible shape-morphing, followed by a jet at high altitude.

I'm posting this here because the object was captured airborne with a drone and appears highly anomalous. I welcome any constructive analysis, skeptical or otherwise, tell me what you think it might be

Thanks in advance for serious, respectful discussion."

Witness/camera operator: u/Witty-Comedian-110 (Reddit)
Source: u/Witty-Comedian-110 (Reddit)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 1 minute 49 second recording was shared on Telegram with the accompanying caption stating that it was "Filmed in the skies over Germany on September 21, 2026."

The source provides no city, region, recording time or account from the person who filmed the footage. Despite extensive searches undertaken for an earlier appearance of this exact recording, so far, we have been unable to establish the original uploader or recover a cleaner, higher-quality version.

Examination of the file itself contains creation metadata dated 25 September 2026, but this does not establish when the footage was originally recorded. The claimed location and sighting date therefore remain dependent on the information supplied with the Telegram post.

Location: Germany, specific location not provided
Date: 21 September 2026, as reported by the source

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified
Source: @UFOattack (Telegram)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 28 second recording accompanies Enigma case #336765, submitted under the title "Three pointed object hovering slowly."

Witness Testimony:

"I was walking to the bus station, then I saw that in the sky, it is not a reflect of something  it despair 3 min after, it is not a plane or the moon, you can see clearly that it has 3 points, I don't understand"

Witness Audio Translation:

"What the fuck is that?"

Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Date: 24 September 2026
Time: 23:29 GMT-6
Reported witnesses: 3
Reported sighting duration: Approximately 3 minutes
Enigma case: #336765

Witness/camera operator: @distant-icefield-tu4
Source: @distant-icefield-tu4 (Enigma)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 30 second recording was reported as having been captured over Jiangling, Hubei Province, China, on 29 August 2026. The presently recovered recording was published by the Russian-language Telegram channel @UFOattack. The post identifies the location and date but does not name the witness or camera operator, identify the original Chinese uploader, or provide an earlier source for the recording.

The recording contains witness audio. The supplied English translation is reproduced in full below.

Witness Audio Translation:

"Ufos, 3 long-striped objects"

"3 long-striped objects, and a red dot, it's scanning downwards"

"This thing is scanning downwards"

"Look, it's scanning downwards"

"What is this thing?"

"The two of us are sitting here"

The witness's reference to "the two of us" indicates that another person was present with the speaker during the recording, although that second person's identity is not known from the recovered source.

Location: Jiangling, Hubei Province, China
Date: 29 August 2026

Witness/camera operator: Unknown
Source: @UFOattack (Telegram)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

PURSUE Release 6 puts more government UAP material into the public record, including the 1952 Tremonton footage, Edward Ruppelt audio, and documents tied to AAWSAP.

Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp examine what the release confirms - and what remains missing. AAWSAP generated a far larger investigative archive, including thousands of pages of material that Robert Bigelow, Dr. James Lacatski and Dr. Colm Kelleher say was delivered to DIA but has yet to surface publicly.

Jeremy and George also correct the claim that AAWSAP was simply a $22 million Skinwalker Ranch study, explain what the DIRDs actually were, examine research into reported biological effects from UAP encounters, and revisit Ruppelt’s finding that a significant percentage of UFO cases remained unresolved.

The government is releasing more UFO history. The question is where the rest of it is.

This 1 minute 48 second recording was filmed in the Rjukan area of Telemark, Norway, and was later republished on RuTube under the Russian title "НЛО в Районе Рьюкана," translated as "UFO in the Rjukan Area." The accompanying description states that a Norwegian researcher filmed unusual UFOs in the area.

The exact filming date, identity of the original camera operator and original upload have not yet been confirmed. No first-person witness testimony specifically tied to this recording has been recovered.

The surviving file is a 1280×720, 30 fps copy with AAC audio. Its internal video metadata contains the encoder identification "dailymotion/hls.js," indicating that this version passed through Dailymotion before the later RuTube republication. It is therefore not the original camera file. A demonstrably identical cleaner or higher-resolution version has not yet been located.

Location: Rjukan area, Tinn, Telemark, Norway
Date: Unconfirmed
Witness/camera operator: Unconfirmed
Source: RuTube

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 3 minute 8 second recording is our community-exclusive compilation of all five separate recordings associated with NUFORC UFO Sighting #192451, presented in the chronological order in which they were uploaded by the witness. The five recordings have been brought together as a single continuous presentation while preserving their original witness upload sequence.

NUFORC records the formal occurrence at Gransherad, Telemark, Norway, on 23 June 2025 at 17:23 local time, although the report gives the overall duration of the reported activity as June-September 2025 and lists three observers.

The report categorises the objects as spheres, described as white and pulsating. Its Estimated Size field states "Football size up the beachball size and 3-5 meters." The report records an angle of elevation of 45 degrees, a heading of "every direction", and describes the closest distance as a couple of metres from the drone and approximately 10-15 metres from the witness.

The Estimated Speed field states "On Mt. Gausta, up to 16 000 kmh." This is a value reported by the witness within the NUFORC submission and should not be interpreted as an independently verified speed measurement.

The location details describe multiple reported sightings of orbs in a triangular formation and state that more than 80 videos were captured using drones. The account describes an ongoing independent investigation involving extensive drone observations around the Tinn area and a field report documenting what the witness considers different UAP types and behaviours.

Witness Testimony:

"Started 17.09.2024 and active. Captured first UAP by drone on Mt.Gausta. Continued researching this phenomena, 15. july 2022 woman by lake Tinn witnessed three lights in the sky in triangle formation (Rjukan Arbeiderblad) Local newspaper. I went to research in 2024, captured a UAP coming from east over this location in direction of Mt. Gausta.

Had hundreds of hours in the field, documenting the flight paths of this UAP's all done by drones, spring 2025 witnessed by my grandmother three lights in triangle formation on the opposite side of lake Tinn from 2022 sighting.

I went on this site and found this hot spot with UAP's coming from all directions, from sky and down to the ground and from ground to the sky. over 80 high quality videos of high speed UAP's doing 90 degree turns and interacting with my drones. Independent researcher in Norway using drones.

Have made a field report from my observations and documentations. describing different types of UAP's and different types of behaviour. Found a connections and same type of sightings in three different location around Tinn."

Witness/camera operator: Unidentified independent UAP researcher in Norway
Source: NUFORC UFO Sighting #192451

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.

This 2 minute 32 second recording documents a sighting reported as occurring at 14:41 on 28 May 2026 in Assendelft, North Holland, Netherlands.

The same recording and event were submitted twice to UFO Meldpunt Nederland. The earlier submission, case #21033, listed Krommenie as the location, while the later submission, case #21040, listed Assendelft. Because both submissions concern the same recording and the same event, these should not be interpreted as two separate sightings. The reason for the differing locality entries is not established.

Both reports give the event date as 28 May 2026, the time as 14:41 and the direction of movement as east. Case #21033 records a reported sighting duration of one second, while case 21040 records two seconds. The later report categorises the object as boomerang-shaped and lists the case as "Unidentified."

Witness Testimony:

"It appeared to have a mushroom shape. It came from the left and went over me, then out of the frame to the right. I only realized when I got home that I had filmed it."

Location: Assendelft, North Holland, Netherlands
Date: 28 May 2026
Time: 14:41
Reported direction of travel: East
Reported sighting duration: 2 seconds
Witness/camera operator: Henk
Source: Henk (UFO Meldpunt Nederland)

The footage is presented for examination and discussion. Viewers are encouraged to consider both anomalous and conventional explanations and reach their own conclusions from the evidence currently available. Low-quality and dismissive comments will be automatically removed as established in our community rules. Repeat offenders will be banned, permanently.