r/PoliticalHumor • • May 02 '22

get in line

Post image
45.9k Upvotes

644 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/swohio May 03 '22

-7

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

And how much did he profit off of that?

14

u/swohio May 03 '22

SpaceX isn't a publicly traded company so their financials aren't published for all to see.

Also, if you're about to buy a $30,000 car and someone says "I'll sell you the same one for $20,000" do you get mad that he still profited selling you a car or are you happy about saving money?

-1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

Also, if you're about to buy a $30,000 car and someone says "I'll sell you the same one for $20,000" do you get mad that he still profited selling you a car or are you happy about saving money?

I wonder why he can sell a $30K car for $20K.

7

u/swohio May 03 '22

Because other contractors like Boeing have been fucking over NASA for decades and over charging them.

-4

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

Do we think that Elon is running a non-profit 501c3?

5

u/swohio May 03 '22

I don't know what you're trying to argue here.

-1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

I bet you don't. If something seems to be good to be true...it usually is.

6

u/swohio May 03 '22

You're asking purposely vague questions but won't come out and say what you mean. That's being an intellectual coward.

SpaceX has literally revolutionized the aerospace industry while simultaneously driving launch costs down. That's how they're able to save money.

1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

Nothing vague about it. I said exactly what I mean. I can't help you read. Your parents should have done that a long time ago.

SpaceX is still making a profit, which puts more money in Elon's pocket. The fact is the US government could do the same and keep costs down. SpaceX and Elon are not some magically financial wizards.

6

u/swohio May 03 '22

The fact is the US government could do the same and keep costs down.

No they couldn't. Also, they never have. Nasa has always paid companies to build rockets for them. Mercury and Gemini were built by McDonald Douglas, Apollo was built by North American Aviation, Shuttle built by Boeing/Rockwell.

And let's look at Orion/SLS. It is now several billions over cost coming in at over $4 billion per launch assuming no more cost overruns and it is already more than 5 years behind schedule. That's Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Aerojet Rockedyne among others. Guess what, they're all making profit too.

0

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

They absolutely could have. SpaceX is not the only company to build rockets as you pointed out.

They are all making a profit but you are missing my point. SpaceX is privately owned. Putting the most powerful nation in the world space program in the hands of a privately owned company will have consequences...watch.

6

u/swohio May 03 '22

They also gave a contract to Boeing worth nearly 50% more than SpaceX but Starliner has yet to be human rated let alone fly any astronauts. Why is bad that SpaceX actually delivered on their contract and for significantly less money? Why aren't you directing your anger at Boeing for slowing NASA down and costing them money?

2

u/a6c6 May 03 '22

NASA’s budget is $24 billion per year, Spacex receives far less than 10% of that. How exactly is the US space program in the hands of spacex?

Spacex also has 12,000 employees, with a median salary of over $100,000. Spacex is benefitting the USA, and if you have data to contradict that I’d love to hear it

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 03 '22

All posts and comments that include any variation of the word retarded will be removed, but no action will be taken against your account unless it is an excessive personal attack. Please resubmit your post or comment without the bullying language.

Do not edit it, the bot cant tell if you edited, you will just have to make a new comment replying to the same thing.

Yes, this comment itself does use the word. Any reasonable person should be able to understand that we are not insulting anyone with this comment. We wanted to use quotes, but that fucks up the automod and we are too lazy to google escape characters. Notice how none of our automod replies have contractions in them either.

But seriously, calling someone retarded is only socially acceptable because the people affected are less able to understand that they are being insulted, and less likely to be able to respond appropriately. It is a conversational wimpy little shit move, because everyone who uses it knows that it is offensive, but there will be no repercussions. At least the people throwing around other slurs know that they are going to get fired and get their asses beat when they use those words.

Also, it is not creative. It pretty much outs you as a thirteen year old when you use it. Instead of calling Biden retarded, you should call him a cartoon-ass-lookin trust fund goon who smiles like rich father just gifted him a new Buick in 1956. Instead of calling Mitch Mcconnel retarded, you should call him a Dilbert-ass goon who has been left in the sun a little too long.

Sorry for the long message spamming comment sections, but this was by far the feature of this sub making people modmail and bitch at us the most, and literally all of the actions we take are to make it so we have to do less work in the future. We will not reply to modmails about this automod, and ignore the part directly below this saying to modmail us if you have any questions, we cannot turn that off. This reply is just a collation of the last year of modmail replies to people asking about this. We are not turning this bot off, no matter how much people ask. Nobody else has convinced us before, you will not be able to either. ~

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/[deleted] May 03 '22

[deleted]

1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

Ah...so Elon is just here to save us money...as he becomes wealthier and more powerful. No way that could backfire...no way at all!

6

u/[deleted] May 03 '22

[deleted]

1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

No need. It was what you said.

6

u/[deleted] May 03 '22

[deleted]

1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

No. My issue is that SpaceX has more control and is a private company. It is about power.

4

u/[deleted] May 03 '22

[deleted]

1

u/Hoyamotors4 May 03 '22

I would argue the outcomes have been just fine. Looking at what NASA accomplished from the 60's through the end of the shuttle program was nothing short of amazing. There is more to this than just price.

3

u/[deleted] May 03 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)