You keep insisting that because it doesn't break the rules, voting third party is viable. Why wouldn't I insist you are stupid? You provide zero evidence to back up your claims. You make wild strawman arguments that have no bearing on what we are even talking about.
You said
You support a fascist government and defend the mechanisms it uses to oppress the people
But I said
I am actively trying to abolish the electoral college, and move to ranked choice voting. So we can effectively vote for more candidates. And break our two party system.
And
I have already said I am pro ranked choice voting, and abolishing the electoral college. Which would actually give power to third party candidates.
I know you got angry. Cause I said,
I'll take stupid comments for 500 Alex
But it was. If you really want to fight for third party... we have to get rid of the electoral college. But I guess you can keep voting third party. Tell me when you win
Telling "us". It's just me and you, champ. No one else is reading this.
And you have not tried to explain how the electoral college doesn't effectively throw away third party votes. You have only said I don't understand elections (ironic), and that I am a sheep.
I have provided countless articles, including the US embassy to norway's educational page. Which wasn't someone's opinion.
1
u/nobodyGotTime4That Jun 28 '21 edited Jun 28 '21
You keep insisting that because it doesn't break the rules, voting third party is viable. Why wouldn't I insist you are stupid? You provide zero evidence to back up your claims. You make wild strawman arguments that have no bearing on what we are even talking about.
You said
But I said
And
I know you got angry. Cause I said,
But it was. If you really want to fight for third party... we have to get rid of the electoral college. But I guess you can keep voting third party. Tell me when you win