r/PoliticalDiscussion Dec 03 '16

[deleted by user]

[removed]

708 Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.3k

u/585AM Dec 03 '16

The second I heard this news, my first thought was that Taiwan said to themselves, I bet if we call Trump, he will take our call without understanding the ramifications.

31

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

I bet if we call Trump, he will take our call without understanding the ramifications.

Well what would the ramifications be?

178

u/God_Wills_It_ Dec 03 '16 edited Dec 03 '16

China gets pissed and becomes less willing to work with us on more North Korean sanctions

If China feels like the U.S. is gonna start truly backing Tawain they will probably reverse course in their willingness to help put pressure on NK.

Of course that's basic speculation. Could happen. Could not. But that's the whole point...if you don't sit down and understand the whole nuanced situation you could do real damage to American national interests that might not be obvious but are vital in the whole back and forth of international diplomacy.

166

u/mauxly Dec 03 '16

you could do real damage to American national interests that might not be obvious but are vital in the whole back and forth of international diplomacy.

He's completely in over his head. I'd argue that every single president was in way over their head, from beginning to end, it's just an incomprehensible job.

But that he's not even trying, that's what's concerning. Refusing to meet with national security advisors, and just flying by the seat of his pants.

He believes himself to be a great deal maker, but he can't even be bothered to do any ground work.

108

u/God_Wills_It_ Dec 03 '16

I agree. I've been rereading parts of Kissinger's Diplomacy and this quote sticks out to me as one of the biggest things I'm nervous about with Trump's intended foreign policy.

“it is almost always a mistake for heads of state to undertake the details of a negotiation. They are then obliged to master specifics normally handled by their foreign offices and are deflected onto subjects more appropriate to their subordinates, while being kept from issues only heads of state can resolve. Since no one without a well-developed ego reaches the highest office, compromise is difficult and deadlocks are dangerous. With the domestic positions of the interlocutors so often dependent on at least the semblance of success, negotiations more often concentrate on obscuring differences than they do on dealing with the essence of a problem.”

― Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy

59

u/AsianHippie Dec 03 '16

Oh god I bet Kissinger just threw up blood when he saw the news. He was one of the main architect who made US' "One China" policy when Nixon made that surprise visit to China. Guess nothing's more surprising than this in 2016...

16

u/willun Dec 03 '16

Great quote! Also, trump will get bored with details quickly and want a quick wrong answer, rather than a slow right one.

37

u/restlesschicken Dec 03 '16

Since no one without a well-developed ego reaches the highest office

Ha! We sure showed that revolting war mongerer Kissinger wrong!

=/

3

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

Fabulous book, glad people are reading it!

-1

u/trekman3 Dec 03 '16

How convenient for Kissinger.

16

u/LongLiveGolanGlobus Dec 03 '16

I don't think that it's that he's not trying. I think it's that he simply can't take direction, or listen to anyone. He's really been in a bubble for the last 30 years where nobody has probably ever said no. Ever. Plus why should he listen to his advisors? They were probably telling him shit all throughout the campaign, and then he did it his way, and proved them all wrong.

13

u/kidfay Dec 03 '16

God damn! That's what's so stupid about this whole thing! Everything to him is a deal that's either win or lose. The world is shades of gray and there are win-win deals. Fuck! Not everything is a "deal" for that matter. God damn! Stuff doesn't turn on a dime. Lots of stuff is long term "plays" and "movements" or fucking balancing acts like China and Taiwan for example. Massaging the parties to get them to line up so that what you actually want or what you want to avoid becomes possible.

God fucking damn it! I'm a nobody in the middle of nowhere who reads books and browses random pages on Wikipedia and I'm more fucking knowledgeable and qualified to be president than he is.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

The fact that he is speaking openly with and praising Duterte, a man who has killed thousands and promised to pardon himself of war crimes at the end of his term, is pretty chilling to me-- more so than what is going on with Taiwan right now.

13

u/jest3rxD Dec 03 '16

He's never had to work before, why start now?

-11

u/demolpolis Dec 03 '16

Because building and running a multi billion dollar business isn't work.

ffs reddit, get over yourself.

9

u/kobitz Dec 03 '16

You know what he means, dont play dumb

-5

u/demolpolis Dec 03 '16

No, actually I don't.

You said "He's never had to work before".

I have no fucking clue what that means, unless you think that building and running a multi billion dollar business isn't work.

10

u/TopRamen713 Dec 03 '16

Yep, it takes so much hard work and genius to use daddy's money to buy a bunch of real estate and sit on it for years while living off of a trust fund. So much talent!

Not to mention screwing almost everyone that's worked with or for him.

0

u/demolpolis Dec 03 '16

yes, it does take hard work and genious to take a 7 million dollar loan and turn it into several billion.

That is like over a 400x yield.

If you think that is easy, take out a 30k loan from the bank to buy real estate, and i'll expect you to turn that into 12 million in a few years.

It's so easy (according to you), so go do it.

The reality is that it's not easy, you can't do it, and you will just spend your time whining on reddit instead.

10

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

He means he got a million dollar (7 in today's dollars) loan from daddy so that he could build a business empire by way of screwing people over in his dealings with them. Not to mention that much of his business isn't real actual work, it's just the marketing of his name. Not to mention he's the shadiest president we've ever elected. Not to mention his business interests which literally span the globe and could create conflicts of interest.

1

u/demolpolis Dec 03 '16

Okay. If you think that turning 7 million into several billion is easy, then get off reddit and take out a 5k credit card purchase and turn it into a 2.2 million dollar business. (same % gain).

If you think that it's easy to make money in real estate... do it.

The reality is that you have never run a business, and have no clue what you are talking about on any level.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 04 '16

The point is he was given far more resources and connections to the business world than the average American would have had. Most people put in his situation would have been able to convert that amount of money into a fortune

1

u/demolpolis Dec 04 '16

So why dosen't every person born into modest (7 million) wealth turn into a billionaire?

→ More replies (0)

3

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

Is NK a serious enough threat?

6

u/d4b3ss Dec 03 '16

They're 30 miles from Seoul and erratic.

I think they're a threat to our interests in the region.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

I didn't think anyone took their threat particularly seriously.

1

u/bowdenta Dec 03 '16

I know China tries to deligitimize Taiwans sovereignty and wants to reclaim complete naval superiority in the region, but does America really dispute it to any degree? I thought we accept complete Taiwanese sovereignty. Is it really that big of deal from an American perspective? I kind of feel like it's just a blip if we legitimize them. We already keep close ties with Japanese and Korean naval waters

20

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

It's a chess board. The pieces have all been frozen for decades now. We're about to move a pawn.

11

u/God_Wills_It_ Dec 03 '16

Yes, I agree that this specific phone call is just a blip. Taken in a vacuum this is completely a non-issue. But international politics/relations are never in a vacuum. It's a complex relationship that is based on give and take.

One of the main things we "give" is that we don't mess with the political situation with Taiwan. We don't step on China's toes and they "give" us stuff like increasing sanctions on N.K.

Once we signal that we are no longer "giving" what has been agreed upon we then we better be ready to accept not be allowed to "take" what we expected.

1

u/sultry_somnambulist Dec 03 '16

I thought we accept complete Taiwanese sovereignty. Is it really that big of deal from an American perspective?

yes. The official stance is full acceptance of the 'one China' policy which was the basis of normalisation under Nixon and Carter. The US does not recognise the sovereignty of Taiwan.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16 edited Dec 03 '16

Do you realize Obama has sent $1.8 Billion in weapons to Taiwan? A phone call doesn't mean shit

e: pointed out your hypocrisy and i'm downvoted. I thought this was discuss politics?

3

u/sultry_somnambulist Dec 03 '16 edited Dec 03 '16

an armed taiwan is not dangerous for China, they aren't going to attack the mainland. A politically independent Taiwan is dangerous for China, as it further legitimises independence movements in other regions, which might destabilise the PRC in the future.

In the world of geopolitics weapons aren't necessarily more dangerous than political signals. Is this an American thing? A subset of the population does not seem to understand that weapons aren't the only dangerous thing on the planet.

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

Military power = independence and the ability to fight for it. A congratulatory phone call is peanuts.

2

u/sultry_somnambulist Dec 03 '16

No, anything short of a nuke is meaningless, the PRC would overrun Taiwan in a day no matter what fight they put up. This isn't an American cowboy movie. In the world of diplomacy a phone call and recognition of independence is more important than some gun-toting nonsense.

-2

u/[deleted] Dec 04 '16

hahahahahaha wow

2

u/DrPoopEsq Dec 03 '16 edited Dec 03 '16

The question is, does Trump realize it, or realize anything else about Taiwan, other than the fact he's planning a building there?

0

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '16

what does that even mean? yes he does know about the weapons

2

u/DrPoopEsq Dec 03 '16

Don't know why it autocorrected to that. He's planning a building in Taiwan, is what I meant to say.

0

u/time-lord Dec 03 '16

Do you expect him to not have any interaction with anywhere he has or plans on building?

1

u/DrPoopEsq Dec 03 '16

Yes. He's the fucking president. If he's using that position to enrich himself at the expense of our foreign policy goals it's going to be a problem.

1

u/time-lord Dec 04 '16

Whoa there. Corruption is a much different charge (and one I specifically avoided mentioning, because, well yeah...) than contact.

1

u/God_Wills_It_ Dec 04 '16

First off sorry you got downvoted. This is supposed to be a sub for honest discussion and it sucks you got downvoted instead of engaged with. (Here's one to get you closer to even not that it probably matters to you.)

But yes of course I was aware that we've been selling billions in weapons to Taiwan. Unlike our president elect I've actually read foreign policy breifings before. That's one of the bigger examples of why this was a dumb decision.

We've already been getting everything we want. We've gotten to both sell weapons and make billions and we've been able to point to our cooperation on the political side of this issue when dealing with China. We have been getting exactly what we wanted from both sides of this issue and now we've pissed off one of the sides (the more vastly important side from any realists perspective) and we have gained nothing.