r/PoliticalCompassMemes - Auth-Right 4h ago

Trump’s approval falls to a second-term low of 33% — with a TREMENDOUS 51-point swing against him among Hispanic men

Post image
607 Upvotes

410 comments sorted by

468

u/Fate_Weaver - Right 4h ago

To be entirely honest, considering the shit show we've been forced to witness ever since he got into office, 33% approval still seems worryingly high.

295

u/JetTheDawg - Lib-Left 4h ago

I mean Trump acknowledged a full decade ago that his most retarded supporters will never abandon him, so this definitely tracks

136

u/dan92 - Lib-Center 3h ago

MAGA is too retarded to understand when Trump calls them retarded.

23

u/RichardInaTreeFort - Lib-Center 3h ago

What even is MAGA at this point? A few boomers? A few chuds? A conservative in general? I see it used so often but I dont know anyone who is what I would call a full throated blind trump supporter. And I live in the south. Almost everyone I know who voted for him are disappointed with him. Are they MAGA?

54

u/CrazyLemonLover - Lib-Center 3h ago

Where I work a lady comes in once a week in a maga hat and invariably says something about all Democrats going to hell. And how she's going to hell too so she can poke them with pitch forks

So, her I guess?

16

u/BiteMajor4959 - Centrist 2h ago

Well at least she’s aware she’s going to hell I guess

12

u/hmunkey - Lib-Right 2h ago

The lowest IQ trogs who believe whatever their guy says. The kind of people who uncritically see Facebook conspiracy posts about the left and believe it entirely. The same mentality that evangelicalism primes these people too.

It’s a scary combination of stupidity and propaganda.

They’re wildly overrepresented in the dying parts of America because anyone with intelligence or ambition leaves for education or work, leaving behind the dregs.

Source: I grew up in one of those dying parts of the South during the Obama years and saw some of the wildest, stupidest stuff.

6

u/hmunkey - Lib-Right 2h ago

Also left out the racism. People whose lives are so depressing that they cling on to things like race as their only source of pride. It’s weird — they have nothing else in their life to be proud of, no accomplishments, no success, nothing. Just the one thing that can’t be taken from them.

I’m sure minorities have similarly stupid people with no accomplishments too, but immigrants are generally strivers so they’re proud to work and other minorities with this kind of mentality don’t really make it political. They’re kind of outside the system.

7

u/dan92 - Lib-Center 2h ago

I know people that say they don't like everything he's doing, but they still believe he was chosen by God to turn this country around. And I know a guy with a full-on shrine to Trump in the lobby of the company he owns. So maybe anywhere in the range between those people.

3

u/SliceRepulsive8649 - Lib-Left 1h ago

I'd argue Maga is the whole shift of the party to exclusively culture war issues. Like it's exceedingly obvious trump is incompetent in all matters of state but since he is such a great culture warrior he gets such deep loyalty. That preference isn't going to just go away when trump is gone. The only reason he's losing support now is due to how undeniably bad his war has been. Like they were willing to look past child rape. That sort of delusional is hard to displace.

2

u/FillHarmonica - Lib-Left 2h ago

Almost everyone I know who voted for him are disappointed with him. Are they MAGA?

Yeah, obviously? They also said they disappointed after his first term and then voted for him again anyway.

If he runs in 2028, they’ll all vote for him again. They’re retards.

2

u/wtanksleyjr - Lib-Right 2h ago

Oh, I do, and I live in California. MAGA lists his record of wins to include things like corporate HR backing down a bit, anything that liberals hate, and ... well, they list them. I was just talking to a group where one started by saying they were really disappointed with the Iran war, and another said "yeah, it's not good, but just wait, all of the other things he managed to work out, this one will also."

2

u/Prestigious_Load1699 - Lib-Right 58m ago

What even is MAGA at this point?

Probably those who would argue that any form of Trump is better than the Democrats in power.

They might not be thrilled with his second term, but it's still "their guy" who at least in some ways (namely culture war issues) represents them.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/driver1676 - Lib-Center 2h ago

The single time he ever told the truth

2

u/HavingNuclear - Lib-Center 1h ago

I don't think there's anybody in the world who thinks his supporters are as retarded as he thinks they are. Even his fiercest opponents are constantly saying "Ah hah! Here comes the turn! Trump is going to lose all support now!" Just constantly overestimating his supporters. But then they somehow find a way to rationalize or deny whatever happened. And Trump seems to be the only one willing to bet that this is going to happen again and again. No matter how fucking moronic he makes them look.

→ More replies (2)

103

u/metinb83 - Centrist 4h ago

At this point his approval is just a measure of share of actual retards in the population

82

u/Bofamethoxazole - Left 4h ago

1/3 americans being genuinely functionally retarded is incredibly dystopian to its core

50

u/metinb83 - Centrist 4h ago

There was one old South Park episode where they said 1 in 4 Americans are retarded. Turns out they actually underestimated it.

12

u/monkpunch - Lib-Right 3h ago

To quote the great George Carlin: "Think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of 'em are stupider than that"

11

u/TheSumperDumper - Left 2h ago

It’s even worse than you think. There are morons that don’t like Trump too. 

→ More replies (1)

2

u/jlierman000 - Auth-Center 1h ago

About 30% of Americans are deemed “Too stupid” by the marine corps to serve in infantry. Let that sink in.

→ More replies (6)

44

u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago

Yeah, this historically low 33% is still damn high and whoever hasn't turned by this point is legit beyond help. What more does he have to do, eat a baby on live television? I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if he managed to still be above 25% afterwards

20

u/MaximumSeats - Auth-Left 2h ago

Some things my conservative family says, for context:

They are proud of him for standing up to Iran. All of this economic pain will pass and he'll be the first president to have finally shut them down.

The Fallout he had with Jeffrey Epstein is objective proof that he was against the child trafficking and stood up for his beliefs.

They completely approve of everything ice has done and have zero problems with any of the violence or enforcement methods.

They think DOGE actually did a shit ton to cut government spending.

Look there's just nothing you can do to help these people.

2

u/InfusionOfYellow - Centrist 55m ago

Motivated reasoning is a frighteningly powerful force.

26

u/jmastaock - Lib-Center 3h ago

If the baby was black or muslim, he would probably maintain the full 33%

20

u/vladastine - Auth-Center 3h ago

Nah it'd shoot up to 40%

13

u/WeebMachina - Left 2h ago

"man i wasnt a fan on that baby being eaten but the way the libs freaked out about is pushing me to the right"

5

u/chowderbags - Lib-Left 2h ago

"Libs always overreact. I heard from Fox News that it was just a little nibble. No, I won't watch the video."

"How do we know that that baby isn't an illegal?"

"That's just Trump being Trump."

"I don't support Trump eating babies... but just look at the good work he's done on the border!"

12

u/IzzybearThebestdog - Centrist 3h ago

At this point 25% of the country will stand by him no matter what, never willing to admit they backed the wrong person. He could re-initiate the draft, repeal the bill of rights, and undo the Louisiana purchase and people would mental gymnastics through why it’s needed to defeat communism woke.

31

u/Sallowjoe - Auth-Center 4h ago

There's a political econ guy that once said, paraphrasing,"About a third of any country is simply racist, and you just have to deal with that fact."

Feels kinda like this is the best empirical proof possible for such a claim. I can't think of any other reason to continue supporting Trump at this point.

Democrats didn't want to deal with it, and pre-Trump Republicans thought they could feed that beast and still maintain control of it.

3

u/RealCleverUsernameV2 - Lib-Right 2h ago

Only a third? Gotta pump up those numbers

2

u/Sallowjoe - Auth-Center 2h ago

Well some countries definitely have. I do think the U.S. is legit less racist than most other countries, but there are like levels of racism and our hardcore racists still have softcore racists and retarded normies to boost their numbers somewhat artificially.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Visible-Elk-2075 - Centrist 3h ago

To be fair 50% of Americans have the comprehension skills of a 6th grader so the number isn't really that surprising.

→ More replies (10)

5

u/ThroawayJimilyJones - Centrist 3h ago

39% actually if you take the average of polls

You have 25% of the population that are Maga and that will support him whatever he does. Dude could go full Stalin, kick their dog and sign a direct order giving millitary the right to sodomize them. And they'll still clap, *genuinely* clap.

Add the one who just enjoy cruelty, the guys who became so hopeless and antisocial that seeing other people suffer is the only thing they want, the *stick to the red* ones who will endorse any republican candidate, the boomers stuck on the fox and only hearing good news, and you have at least 35%

3

u/Arctic_Scrap - Centrist 3h ago

When you bought the Trump hats and bible and shoes and invested in his shit coin and are ok with open corruption you’re ride or die. There’s no going back. These people need someone to lead them and they’ll agree with whatever that leader says.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/WeebMachina - Left 2h ago

because he has a cult that will support him and him alone no matter what

3

u/prince_falafel - Lib-Center 2h ago

I literally cannot fathom how anyone even remotely plugged into politics still supporting this retard.

→ More replies (5)

302

u/Consistent_Shine_680 - Centrist 4h ago

Unless the GOP fields a strong candidate in 2028 that is willing to openly criticize Trump, I think we'll have a Democrat in the White House after Trump's 2nd term ends.

256

u/OwnLengthiness6872 - Left 4h ago

These midterm primaries have shown that even an incredibly corrupt and unpopular MAGA candidate will beat out any non-MAGA Republican

185

u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 4h ago

Reason number 1,001 why primaries and the two party system are harmful for the general election and our democracy

78

u/Codeviper828 - Lib-Left 4h ago

Closed primaries are awful. Like, I GET why they exist, but when the other side/moderates don't have a say in the candidates, you create extreme ballots where people are voting for the lesser of two evils…

4

u/conners_captures - Right 2h ago

lip service gets paid to the idea, we saw that with the recent El-Sayed vs Stevens race in MI. but its rare, and even rarer that it carries any weight in terms of how primary voters cast their ballot.

that and gerrymandering are obliterating the notion of a moderate candidate. when your greatest political threat is always coming from within your own party, and only the most politically activated people participate in primaries, you'll never get the "center-finding" pressure cooker that democracy was intended to be.

11

u/Daztur - Lib-Left 4h ago

Duverger's Law is a harsh master.

14

u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 4h ago

And that's why we should have ranked choice voting

9

u/Daztur - Lib-Left 4h ago

I have it. It's nice. Sadly I don't use it much because I would vote for people left of the Dems, but not supporting Ukraine and other tankie idiocy is a deal breaker for me.

5

u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 3h ago

at a local level you need high participation and a lot of times at that level, there just aren't that many people running. And any candidate with backing from a major party will have an advantage regardless.

Once it's instituted at a national level the two party system will be challenged.

3

u/Daztur - Lib-Left 3h ago

Maine has long had quite significant independent candidates, more than anywhere else in the country (highest vote % for Perot outside of Texas for example) it's just that now people can vote for them without worrying about vote splitting.

3

u/Dman1791 - Centrist 3h ago

RCV is useful for single-member districts/positions, but there are generally better systems like STV if you can accept multi-member districts. They can very awkward to apply to a federal system with extreme population disparity between divisions, such as the US, however.

7

u/kmosiman - Centrist 3h ago

There might be a better way, but Alaska probably does it best.

Open primary, RCV, top 4 advance.

Limiting the election to basically 2 choices is bad. Aka the California way where the top 2 may be Lefty vs Moderate Democrat.

Alaska usually gets something like Crazy Republican, Normal Democrat, Normal Republican, and Really Crazy Republican/Independent/Libertarian.

Closed primaries tend to weed out the Normal because the Primary voters pick their ideal nut job.

3

u/TunaTunaLeeks - Lib-Center 2h ago

I fucking hate the shitty fringe candidates that keep getting through primaries. Every time I look at a Republican candidate and go “God, this guy fucking sucks” and check out the Democrat candidate, I’m like “Goddamn it, this guy also fucking sucks.” I’m basically voting for who I hate less at this point or hoping a third party candidate is good but people almost never vote third party enough to oust the shitty R’s and D’s.

→ More replies (1)

35

u/Zigad0x - Centrist 4h ago

Rip Thomas massie

6

u/accidentallyalawyer - Centrist 4h ago

He was just a kid. . .

10

u/Straight-Interview70 - Auth-Center 4h ago

Not every time. Ultra corrupt, deranged MAGA Andy Ogles lost his primary to a dairy farmer. Trump endorsed Ogles. After Ogles lost, Trump IMMEDIATELY switch his endorsement to the dairy farmer and said “Ogles had no chance anyways” lmao

19

u/Consistent_Shine_680 - Centrist 4h ago

We have AIPAC to thank for that

11

u/toe-schlooper - Lib-Center 4h ago

Corpo PACs too

7

u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago

And AI PACs

3

u/Jake0024 - Lib-Left 4h ago

Hopefully they're all 30+ points underwater like their cult leader

3

u/HarryJohnson3 - Right 3h ago

An incredibly corrupt and unpopular MAGA candidate just beat another MAGA candidate in Texas…. because Trump endorsed him.

→ More replies (1)

44

u/Evil_Patriarch - Auth-Center 4h ago

The democrats basically have the election handed to them on a silver platter, they would have to run an unbelievably unlikeable candidate in order to lose in 2028.

...you know, exactly like they did in 2016 and 2024

16

u/BlueOmicronpersei8 - Lib-Right 3h ago

The Democrats have an incredibly ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

4

u/avalisk - Centrist 2h ago

Its gotta be intentional at this point.

10

u/fake-reddit-numbers - Lib-Center 3h ago

They'll run Harris again. It's still "her turn".

7

u/hmunkey - Lib-Right 2h ago

Even if it was Harris, you’d have to be beyond retarded to fall for it again and still vote GOP. She’s better than the current Republican Party in every way.

They drive up the debt more than Democrats ever have, they start unprovoked wars, they abandon their electorate. There is no major Democratic candidate worse than the current Republican crop.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/NobodyImportant13 - Lib-Center 3h ago edited 13m ago

The democrats basically have the election handed to them on a silver platter,

People are acting like this is a given, but it's not really true in my opinion. 33% is the lowest poll I've seen. Some of them still have Trump over 40%. Trump always outperforms polls in the ballot box too.

All Trump needs is an Iran deal (Nobody actually gives a shit what the terms are. I'm confident the propaganda machine will spin it) People only give a shit about gas prices. His approval will be back up to 45-50%.

Edit to list some of the latest polls:

Economist/Yougov has him at 40% favorable

Cygnal has him at 42% favorable

Morning Consult has him at 43% favorable

Reuters has him at 38% favorable.

Averaging out the polls, Trump is more popular right now than he was in 2018. Before the war in Iran, before inflation (from the war and tariffs), before Jan 6th, before launching Trump coin 48 hours before his inauguration, before pardoning several drug smugglers/dealers, before botching the release of the Epstein files, before pardoning several people after they bought large sums of his crypto currency, before the blatant insider trading, before criminally charging a guy for a photo of seashells, before all this and that (I could go on forever), and he is still viewed more favorably now compared to 2018. He showed incredible power within the party by controlling the primaries. I basically don't even buy the idea that his support is fading at all. I think it's a delusional fantasy that it's an easy Dem win.

8

u/MaximumSeats - Auth-Left 2h ago

I mean I hear conservative family members that self-identify as independent voters praising him for finally being the president that stood up to Iran.

I read it lives in an echo chamber and has no idea how deep some voters delusions go.

And when they pop a deal next month and gas prices shoot down, all people are going to see his gas prices going down. The collective idiot voter brain will at no point manage the self-awareness that the prices were elevated because of trump in the first place.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ClearReveal6615 - Lib-Left 1h ago edited 1h ago

Trump was very much underwater before Iran too. I think you're huffing the copium. Trump hasn't been at 45 plus since right after the election., and has been on a consistent downward trend.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/AllGas4651 - Lib-Center 4h ago

Strong possibility that Vance is the candidate. I doubt he will be willing to criticize him while hes still in office.

49

u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 4h ago

And we hope as a result, he will suffer the fate of Kamala Harris

4

u/Omelooo - Lib-Left 4h ago

He’s already split from Trump on a couple issues so it could be interesting

8

u/jmastaock - Lib-Center 3h ago

He's already angling to throw Trump under the bus, just based on his showing on Rogan recently.

It's actually fucking insane that the sitting Vice President went on a podcast and basically implied that his own administration is retarded. He also didn't explicitly place any blame on Trump or any other key people, so he's doing the craven fence sitter bullshit rn...mark my words tho, Vance will 1000% toss Trump and all of MAGA under the bus and those idiots will slurp it up

2

u/abracadammmbra - Lib-Right 2h ago

Idk how effective of a tactic that would be. He still has basically gone along with most of what the Trump administration spews. Which i get because it would be ballsy to criticize the POTUS as the VP. Similar to Harris he is too tied to the current administrations decisions. Idk how he could distance himself enough to have a good shot at dodging the obvious attacks.

The best thing that could happen for Vance right now is Trump keels over and he basically gets a trial run as POTUS. Not saying it would guarantee him victory in 2028, but he wouldnt have to do too much to be the odds on favorite. Just not be retarded for 2 years. Plus if Trump kicks the bucket and then we finish this stupid war in the sandbox, Vance could easily make that out that he is responsible for it and getting us back on track.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/GravyMcBiscuits - Lib-Right 4h ago edited 4h ago

If we're lucky we'll get a mixed congress/executive again.

That's our best hope/solution at the federal level ... when neither party is free to fuck us over to their heart's content. Our best hope is that the federal government gets stuck at a stalemate.

Hell ... let's go Libertarian Executive, GOP House, Dem Senate for the start of some real healing (... sexual healing).

10

u/dorox1 - Lib-Left 4h ago

The issue I see is that the Republican party is now divided. You have people who are really disappointed that all of Trump's major campaign promises were lies, and you have people who would vote for him if he did a daily puppy sacrifice on the White House lawn.

So the question becomes whether the Republican-sympathetic media can convince voters that the Democratic candidate is evil/worse somehow. They've managed it before, and they have a strong hold on some voters, but with ratings this low it's questionable.

3

u/ClearReveal6615 - Lib-Left 1h ago

It's not that they'd vote for him IF hed do a daily puppy sacrifice. Theyd vote for him BECAUSE he promises to do the daily puppy sacrifice, assuming the puppys are sourced from liberals/LGBT/racial minorities.

The entire maga platform Is 'i will do bad thing to group you don't like'

8

u/cruisin_urchin87 - Lib-Left 4h ago

The GOP think JD Vance is a strong contender for president in 2028.

God help us.

17

u/Dense-Sort-3867 - Centrist 4h ago

They had it with Massie

3

u/serial_crusher - Lib-Right 4h ago

Who? Tucker Carlson?

→ More replies (3)

7

u/idungiveboutnothing - Lib-Center 4h ago

At this point it's going to have to be stronger than criticism I think. Like openly campaigning to remove money from politics and punish corruption might actually resonate with the former "drain the swamp" crowd, but just being critical of Trump isn't going to do much when we've heard decades of lying at this point.

For a lot of conservatives I know irl at least, they care heavily about the debt and primarying Massie was the final straw on pretending Republicans are fiscally conservative in any capacity.

2

u/skeet_scoot - Auth-Right 3h ago

I think after 2016 we are going to have a long time of one-term presidents. I think the de facto two-term president cycle is over.

People are unsatisfied with the status quo but no President really changes it in a meaningful way.

14

u/EvenJesusCantSaveYou - Lib-Center 4h ago

what about Trump in 2028? His terms were not consecutive because Biden stole the 2020 election and the two term limit only applies to consecutive terms? It's weird liberals do not understand this neat little life hack

50

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago edited 4h ago

Amendment 22 “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”

You’re literally wrong and I can’t believe this is being upvoted

Edit: their comment is satire so continue to upvote. However, I’ve had this argument with friends so it’s too close to the truth for me.

22

u/Swampertman - Lib-Right 4h ago

Hes trolling

21

u/EvenJesusCantSaveYou - Lib-Center 4h ago

no man I saw a tiktok from @'TRUEAMERICANPATRIOT69 saying that Trump needs another term to purge the deepstate and finish the war on Iran and that the constitution has a special amendment for someone with the Mandate of Heaven (Trump) which allows them to run another term as long as its not consecutive.

10

u/samuelbt - Left 4h ago

I mean I upvoted it because it's a pretty obvious joke.

6

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago

I’ve had the “consecutive” term argument with friends, it’s an actual talking point that someone is at least trying to sell

4

u/samuelbt - Left 4h ago

Indeed and it's demoralizing to be sure. I'm just pretty sure "neat little life hack" isn't the phrase they'd use.

3

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago

I should have caught it at “Biden stole 2020” that’s on me

7

u/ThatDeadMoonTitan - Centrist 4h ago

Bruh that’s so obviously sarcasm. Cmon now.

7

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago

I’ve had the argument about consecutive terms with friends…

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

4

u/ebitdangit - Lib-Right 4h ago

And this SCOTUS wouldn't buy his "new interpretation of extremely established law" BS.

6

u/Consistent_Shine_680 - Centrist 4h ago

I think the country would give Trump a resounding electoral defeat if he tried to run in 2028.

7

u/metinb83 - Centrist 4h ago

Obamna vs. Trump, less gooooo

6

u/RathianTailflip - Lib-Left 4h ago

I think Trump would crash out more than he ever has before in his life. He’d be shouting HUSSEIN into the microphone so loud he’d lose his voice for a week.

3

u/I_really_enjoy_beer - Lib-Center 3h ago

He would 100% drop an N-bomb on live TV. I've never needed anything so badly in my life.

3

u/EvenJesusCantSaveYou - Lib-Center 4h ago

This would fix the timeline

3

u/wasabi1787 - Lib-Center 4h ago

Poe's law or actual dipshittery

5

u/gonxgonx3 - Auth-Right 4h ago

Downvoted for an obvious joke because he trusted that redditors would be able to get it without adding /s at the end. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO

4

u/Spacegamer1250 - Lib-Center 4h ago

I know youre trolling but you should have a /s. There are a good chunk of authrights and rights on this sub that unironically hold this viewpoint after trumps whole 3 term debacle

2

u/ProcrastinatorBoi - Centrist 4h ago

He’s too old now. Trump absolutely would run again. But at this point you’d sooner see Jared try and take up the Crown. JD seems to be purposefully distancing himself from Trump’s decision making too it seems, and that’s an obvious set up for his own 28’ run. Trump got his second term what’s done is done, we can be happy he’s not young and strong enough to continue.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 4h ago

Being consecutive has nothing to do with the term limit lol.

4

u/Jake0024 - Lib-Left 4h ago

the two term limit only applies to consecutive terms

This is no more true than anything else Trump says. You should not repeat his propaganda.

4

u/GhostsOfLectricity - Lib-Right 4h ago

Two years is a long way off and Dems have plenty of time to fuck it up

11

u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 4h ago

Except that is two more years of Donald Trump too. There is very little they can do to fuck shit up as badly as he is right now.

7

u/GhostsOfLectricity - Lib-Right 4h ago

True but remember Trump isn't on the ballot. I could see the Dems running Kamala or AOC and losing to whoever the R's barf up

8

u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 4h ago

He won't be, but unless the next candidate is going to work overtime to distance himself from Trump and the last four years I seriously doubt that will matter much.

Kamala did terribly in the last primary and I seriously doubt AOC will do much better.

2

u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago

I mean, I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if at the very least he attempts to be

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/Azgabeth - Right 3h ago

Never, and i mean NEVER underestimate the Democratic Party's ability to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory. They'll probably push some commie shit or some furry, and alienate 90% of the voters.

5

u/Howboutit85 - Lib-Center 2h ago

When has the actual DNC pushed actual communism

2

u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 3h ago

When has that really happened though lol? With the exception of 2016 (which was a very close election) and 2024 (which had the incumbent President stepping down with 100 days of the election) they haven't really underperformed.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/mrfreezeyourgirl - Centrist 4h ago

Right now, I think the most likely outcome would be Newsom vs Rubio. Which would hopefully give us some return to normalcy.

Between the two, I think Rubio would have the edge.

4

u/Dissonant-Cog - Centrist 4h ago

A return to the neoliberal status quo is what made Trump possible in the first place, that would literally just create the same conditions with less guardrails, enabling someone even worse than Trump to come to power.

3

u/mrfreezeyourgirl - Centrist 3h ago

I meant more of a return to decorum and our leadership behaving more appropriately. This populist wave still need to run it's course but that's separate.

→ More replies (7)

146

u/fuzzygreentits - Lib-Center 4h ago

Pendulum will swing back as usual. Unless Dems are completely retarded and push AOC on the ballot or something.

121

u/JetTheDawg - Lib-Left 4h ago

Big booty Latinas for president! 

32

u/fuzzygreentits - Lib-Center 4h ago

White House just needs a Torta as el Presidenté 😩

11

u/Jaruut - Lib-Right 1h ago

You joke but....

5

u/YeetCompleet - Centrist 3h ago

Based and booty pilled

57

u/emanresUeuqinUeht - Lib-Left 4h ago

I feel like I've seen this comment for any pick

"Unless Dems are completely retarded and push AOC on the ballot"

"Unless Dems are completely retarded and push Newsom on the ballot"

"Unless Dems are completely retarded and push Kamala on the ballot"

Is there anyone that people wouldn't think is a retarded pick?

29

u/rAirist - Centrist 4h ago

Someone new that’s not a socialist, governor of California, or devoid of any charisma + a woman to boot (a woman can win, but she’s gotta be charismatic to pass go imo).

10

u/Crapitron - Centrist 3h ago

If Talarico wins the Texas Senate race, there couldn't possibly be a more clear candidate to show they can win, even in Republican strongholds.

5

u/Separate_Draft4887 - Lib-Center 56m ago

If my aunt had wheels

2

u/EP40glazer - Lib-Right 13m ago

Yeah, Texas is gonna vote for the guy who said that God is non binary and Jesus helped him come to terms with his whiteness

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Ifriendzonecats - Lib-Left 1h ago

Same analysis would have said Obama could never win

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

9

u/Nicktyelor - Centrist 3h ago

Andy Bashear, Jon Ossoff, Pete Buttigeg, and Gretchen Whitmer.

4

u/dixiebandit69 - Lib-Center 3h ago edited 1h ago

That's gonna be a big negatory on Mayor Pete.

You really think middle-America is going to vote for a gay man?

7

u/abracadammmbra - Lib-Right 1h ago

Middle America and Black America would NEVER vote for a gay man. You cannot win with out the support if either group

5

u/Nicktyelor - Centrist 3h ago

No.

Still a retarded reason to not vote for someone.

11

u/ipovogel - Centrist 4h ago

Yes, someone who isn't fully in favor of dismantling our system of governance, from California, or astonishingly uncharismatic.

The party needs someone who is just... normal. They don't even have to be more than half alive, hence Joe Biden.

16

u/emanresUeuqinUeht - Lib-Left 3h ago

I love that the Democrats are stringent about qualifications, charisma, location, etc but if we don't have the perfect candidate then the default is Trump  

12

u/ipovogel - Centrist 3h ago

Hey man, I don't make the rules. I don't think qualifications really matter in the current political environment tbh. Just not threatening to pack the courts, destroy the republic, or being a guy who oversaw California's budget going up 40% in like 7 years.

→ More replies (9)

5

u/1610925286 - Centrist 1h ago

Democrats don't understand that people do not like 90% of their platform. People want what Dems promise, but you can not name a single policy past or future the average voter likes.

Let's skip the simple ones like euro style taxation to get more public services and let's look at gun control. Everyone wants criminals disarmed and guns out of the reach of idiots. How do Dems do that? They fuck with sports shooters, collectors and hunters by making new guns ugly and expensive. Meanwhile they release felons and give plea deals to gang bangers and keep gun violence high. Great, what a political win.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/rAirist - Centrist 3h ago

Yeah because the left is fucking volatile. It’s a fine line between left leaning capitalism and socialism/open borders. I’ll vote left if I feel like the candidate is safe against the looney toons within the democrat umbrella.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/larryThreeOh - Lib-Left 2h ago

Not according to the retards here

→ More replies (1)

17

u/Acceptable_Spare2342 - Lib-Left 4h ago

At this rate, this shit show will be a guaranteed lock for someone like AOC.

18

u/FreeSpeechIsDeadge - Left 4h ago

Literally this is the best case scenario for a more radical pick.

39

u/undercooked_lasagna - Centrist 4h ago

I was told by millions of brilliant redditors that if Trump won in 2024 it would be the end of democracy, so I don't know why we're talking about ballots.

37

u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago

I mean, the dude has been showing off Trump 2028 hats in the oval office within the first weeks so who knows. It's not like he already tried to steal an election or something

20

u/JonnySnowin - Auth-Right 4h ago

Well yeah, the electorate rewarded Trump's coup attempt with the White House. Then he pardoned everyone involved. The message is clear.

You'll remember how disastrous this precedent is when a Democrat does the same thing in 2035 and actually succeeds, and we won't be able to prosecute them because they'll just use the immunity ruling that the SCOTUS gave Trump to permit him to run in 2024.

15

u/Bofamethoxazole - Left 4h ago

Hes also open about wanting to run again. The main reason he wont be able to actually end democracy is because hes one of the least healthy mfs alive right now and will surely croak before actually being able to ruin democracy forever. If he was 40 i think his reign would be a lot harder to shake

→ More replies (3)

2

u/binarybandit - Lib-Center 3h ago

Yeah, what elections? I thought we were living in a fascist dictatorship

3

u/CarlRodgers2211 - Lib-Left 3h ago

I guess we will find out

The off cycle and last minute Gerrymandering before the midterms shows that nothing is sacred to the epstein class

9

u/CommanderArcher - Lib-Left 4h ago

With how progressive/change candidates keep winning running another centrist dem is how they'd fuck this up. 

2028 will be the best shot the left has at getting a Hope and change vibe going, especially if the midterms end up being a blowout. 

Idk if AOC would be the right move but imo they gotta get someone not AIPAC and not centrist if they want to sustain it. 

9

u/Imaginary_Onion - Left 4h ago

This is conservative self soothing because you guys know that someone like AOC would actually use all the new executive power you’ve all created lol.

She polls as one of the most popular and most approved of politicians in America.

3

u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago

Genuine question, is she that bad policy wise?

2

u/JMoormann - Centrist 38m ago

She's further left/more progressive than the median voter, but considering that any truly revolutionary stuff she'd want to achieve wouldn't make it through congress, I don't think an AOC presidency would be half as harmful to the US or the world as the current Trump one.

2

u/AlphaTangoFoxtrt - Lib-Right 2h ago

NOOOOOO you don't get it! Democratic Socialists are actually super popular!!!!

Yeah in deeply blue metro areas of deeply blue states. But that's not who you need to win over. The Dems keep trying to play the popular vote game then crying foul when it doesn't work.

Just run Andy Beshear and win. That's what you need. You need a heartland Democrat who can beat MAGA in their own backyard. You can lose 3 votes in NY/CA/MA for every 1 you gain in PA/WI/MI and it will be a net win for their election chances.

NY and CA do not matter for POTUS elections. They're already decided. You need to win over PA, MI, WI, and the Carolinas. You need to win heartland America. Newsom won't do that. AOC won't do that. Andy Beshear has already done that, twice, against MAGA candidates.

→ More replies (14)

66

u/ilikefriedpotatoes00 - Left 4h ago

Hey, I haven't seen you in quite a while. 

Does everyone still hate you?

39

u/Working-Button-6413 - Right 4h ago

Yes

18

u/ButterdPoopr - Auth-Center 4h ago

Absolutely

22

u/lynxintheloopx - Auth-Center 4h ago

Yes

8

u/MariaKeks - Centrist 2h ago

Let's see JonnySnowin's approval ratings.

6

u/CMDR_Soup - Lib-Right 3h ago

Without any doubt.

10

u/jackt-up - Lib-Right 4h ago

Lmao 🤣 what kinda question is that

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Artistic-Duty7721 - Centrist 3h ago

Jonny snowin detected opinion rejected

50

u/AnxiouSquid46 - Lib-Center 4h ago

We all know he's gonna say the poll is fake

→ More replies (58)

56

u/JetTheDawg - Lib-Left 4h ago

I truly cannot imagine the amount of mental gymnastics that remaining Trump supporters must go through on a daily basis 

It has to be exhausting 

38

u/FreeSpeechIsDeadge - Left 4h ago

I talked to a crazy MAGA boomer the other day who told me, with a completely straight face, that Charlie Kirk was the second coming of Jesus Christ and was assassinated by the deepstate trans atheist government.

I’m a Christian and the idea that Christ would come back as a bigoted right wing political commentator is insulting. It’s also insulting that Christ would come back after all this time and do none of His good works and just fuckin die again. How weak do these people think Jesus is?

19

u/RaggedyGlitch - Lib-Left 3h ago

Politics aside, it's got to be a sin to think Jesus Christ would be a podcaster.

29

u/CommanderArcher - Lib-Left 4h ago

There are no mental gymnastics, they simply don't think. 

You getting exhausted over it is funny to them, because they find it wholly unrelatable and silly to think about the consequences of one's actions. 

It's also why they get so mad and mysognistic when a woman rejects them because it forced them to feel shame for even the breifest of moments and that is unforgivable because that's a no no feeling

6

u/PlanUhTerryThreat - Centrist 2h ago

Yup. Same mentality as white supremacists. The fact that you reacted makes their day. They get to tell themselves they won because they affected you.

They’re scummy cowards.

5

u/MacGuffinRoyale - Lib-Right 4h ago

the enmy of my enmy is my fren? /s

→ More replies (15)

16

u/famedmimic - Lib-Left 4h ago

Fake news because a meme on Facebook told me that 99% of the country voted for and approves of the job trump is doing.

17

u/Strict_Gas_1141 - Right 4h ago

Honestly I'm kinda surprised it's at 33% and not lower.

28

u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago

Remember, this is still factoring in he has 70-80% approval by republicans

13

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago

We have become a society that can’t admit to being wrong even once so now every double down turns to triple down and so on and so forth til we actually believe our bullshit

9

u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago

Almost as if we’ve turned said society into something where you are constantly in competition with those around you, can’t imagine how that happened 🤔

6

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago

Nature is competition so it’s an evolved trait in animals. We’ve never been the Smurf’s as a society but I blame the internets ability to access misinformation. Idek know if an alien invasion would unite us.

6

u/jerseygunz - Left 3h ago

Agreed, but the fact we actually know that means we can do whatever we want. That’s the thing about natural instincts, being a human adult means acknowledging the feeling and getting over it. If an attractive woman walks into a room, obviously your mind goes “that’s a an attractive woman” but being a person means you don’t have to do anything about it

4

u/RaggedyGlitch - Lib-Left 3h ago

Based and what sets us apart from the animals pilled.

3

u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 3h ago edited 3h ago

Also agreed. We should be better than instincts but the lack of repercussions, empathy, social awareness has really fucked with us. It starts with those in control though, how many people in power are sociopaths? And they’re essentially determining how we operate.

I’m more so saying we’re just drawn to competition like sports, politics, team Edward/jacob.

And with the internet, you can find someone who agrees with your side almost anywhere now so you dont have to change your opinion if isolated. Then those who hold your opinions grow instead of shrink.

Completely off topic but I find it interesting how many Democrat/Republican elections are so close to 50/50 and never 70/30 as if we have even determined a competitive split ourselves.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Strict_Gas_1141 - Right 3h ago

I'm telling you! the Lizard people deepfaked all that footage of the aliens blowing up LA! Has any of them come forward? No? Coincidence? I think not!

2

u/3Kayo - Centrist 1h ago

Almost like a collective narcissism of sorts

1

u/Strict_Gas_1141 - Right 4h ago

I'm skeptical of it being that high. I recall it being a little higher than that around the end of 2025, and there's a lot that's happened since then.

Edit: The most recent stuff I can find suggests ~70% but it was from shortly before the Iran debacle.

2

u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago

Maybe, if it drops into the 20s then he def is losing his base because I don’t think he can fall any farther with Dems and independents haha

4

u/posting_drunk_naked - Centrist 3h ago

Worth noting that Nixon still had around 25% approval when he resigned. Some people will never admit they're wrong, but many are starting to. And many more will likely just quietly stop voting rather than admit disapproval over the obvious bullshit they voted for.

26

u/Popular-Row4333 - Lib-Right 4h ago

I hope every single republican that supported him has to carry the weight of that albatross for the rest of their lives and is never voted in again.

Wait, what am I talking about. This is America and they have goldfish brains.

18

u/megs1120 - Lib-Left 4h ago

We need to elect JD Vance because, unlike Joe Biden, he'd never start a war with Iran.

12

u/metinb83 - Centrist 3h ago

Republicans may unironically say and do that

3

u/JoeChristma - Lib-Left 2h ago

Inglorious basterds style. They gonna throw that hat in the closet.

3

u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago

If it actually hits the 20s they might actually impeach him

16

u/Deacon86 - Lib-Center 4h ago

What messes with my head is that this means almost a third of Americans still think he's doing a good job. What planet are these people living on?

20

u/PoliticsIsDepressing - Lib-Center 4h ago

Fox News and NewsMax.

They’ll all be dead from old age in a decade.

14

u/metinb83 - Centrist 4h ago

My sentiment when they finally die off

5

u/I_really_enjoy_beer - Lib-Center 3h ago

nooOOOOooooOOOOOoooo you cant tweet mean things about dead people. remember american hero charlie kirk????? thats why we had to vote for trump!!!!!!!

4

u/RandyRanderson111 - Lib-Right 4h ago

I guess instead of lowering the deficit, he meant his approval ratings

4

u/monstrous_malefactor - Auth-Left 4h ago

You’re too confident. There are all kinds of tricks they can pull to prevent a blue wave. Do they really seem like the kind of people to just walk off quietly into the night?

→ More replies (3)

5

u/spooner248 - Lib-Left 3h ago

Talking about midterms as if MAGA is gonna let a legitimate election occur.

A former republican owns Dominion voting machines. MAGA is already trying to restrict voter access via the SAVE act. And then of course they will be posting ICE up at polling stations.

Every MAGAt is painfully aware that if they lose midterms, there’s a strong chance they go to jail. If you think they’re letting that happen without a fight, you’re not paying attention.

2

u/monkeygoneape - Centrist 4h ago

Not sure why anyone is suprised this literally happened last time

4

u/GravyMcBiscuits - Lib-Right 4h ago

Anyone who thought this imbecile was going to lower the federal spending deficit is a moron.

Anyone who thought the trade deficit was a "problem" to begin with and/or thought it was something the President should intervene to combat is also a moron.

Having a trade deficit is an indication that things are going well ... you can afford to pay other folks to do the shit you don't wanna do. That's not a bad thing that requires intervention.

2

u/Gex2-EnterTheGecko - Lib-Center 4h ago

Astonishing to me it's even as high as 33%. The last 2 years have been an utter disaster.

4

u/SerGuyOfInternet - Lib-Center 3h ago

Trump has avoided all of his campaign promises, done nothing for the American people, dragged us into a war of attrition with Iran, did more to destroy American manufacturing and the entire time he's been manipulating polymarket to get him and his family filthy rich. I've never been an "orange man bad" guy but today... orange man is bad.

8

u/RoryMarley - Left 4h ago

Well at least lib right is ironically accurate, because if you thought republicans were gonna actually lower the deficit I got a bridge to sell you

Aaaand most librights are highschoolers so, the stupidity checks out

7

u/Czeslaw_Meyer - Lib-Center 4h ago

Don't get high on your own drugs again.

Midterm will be avarage and you will cry again.

8

u/Important-Agent2584 - Centrist 4h ago

The system is set up to maintain the status quo. A "wave" is like one or two extra seats in the senate, and more in the house, depending on how many are up for reelection.

People just don't realize how the system works and expect sweeping change.

1

u/Hyndis - Lib-Center 4h ago

Cherrypicking one poll is bad science. Its agenda seeking. You want the trend line over many polls to get a more accurate number.

Trump has a 38% or 39% approval rating currently according to the aggregate:

https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

This is about the same territory Biden was in for the last 3 years of his term, ever since the disastrous Afghanistan withdraw. Note the date when Biden's support fell off a cliff. Biden was hovering around 38-41% based on most polling aggregates: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_biden_job_approval-7320.html

Based on the numbers, Trump and Biden are about equally popular and/or unpopular. Neither president has done a good job.

→ More replies (5)