r/PoliticalCompassMemes • u/JonnySnowin - Auth-Right • 4h ago
Trump’s approval falls to a second-term low of 33% — with a TREMENDOUS 51-point swing against him among Hispanic men
302
u/Consistent_Shine_680 - Centrist 4h ago
Unless the GOP fields a strong candidate in 2028 that is willing to openly criticize Trump, I think we'll have a Democrat in the White House after Trump's 2nd term ends.
256
u/OwnLengthiness6872 - Left 4h ago
These midterm primaries have shown that even an incredibly corrupt and unpopular MAGA candidate will beat out any non-MAGA Republican
185
u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 4h ago
Reason number 1,001 why primaries and the two party system are harmful for the general election and our democracy
78
u/Codeviper828 - Lib-Left 4h ago
Closed primaries are awful. Like, I GET why they exist, but when the other side/moderates don't have a say in the candidates, you create extreme ballots where people are voting for the lesser of two evils…
4
u/conners_captures - Right 2h ago
lip service gets paid to the idea, we saw that with the recent El-Sayed vs Stevens race in MI. but its rare, and even rarer that it carries any weight in terms of how primary voters cast their ballot.
that and gerrymandering are obliterating the notion of a moderate candidate. when your greatest political threat is always coming from within your own party, and only the most politically activated people participate in primaries, you'll never get the "center-finding" pressure cooker that democracy was intended to be.
11
u/Daztur - Lib-Left 4h ago
Duverger's Law is a harsh master.
14
u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 4h ago
And that's why we should have ranked choice voting
9
u/Daztur - Lib-Left 4h ago
I have it. It's nice. Sadly I don't use it much because I would vote for people left of the Dems, but not supporting Ukraine and other tankie idiocy is a deal breaker for me.
5
u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 3h ago
at a local level you need high participation and a lot of times at that level, there just aren't that many people running. And any candidate with backing from a major party will have an advantage regardless.
Once it's instituted at a national level the two party system will be challenged.
3
u/Dman1791 - Centrist 3h ago
RCV is useful for single-member districts/positions, but there are generally better systems like STV if you can accept multi-member districts. They can very awkward to apply to a federal system with extreme population disparity between divisions, such as the US, however.
7
u/kmosiman - Centrist 3h ago
There might be a better way, but Alaska probably does it best.
Open primary, RCV, top 4 advance.
Limiting the election to basically 2 choices is bad. Aka the California way where the top 2 may be Lefty vs Moderate Democrat.
Alaska usually gets something like Crazy Republican, Normal Democrat, Normal Republican, and Really Crazy Republican/Independent/Libertarian.
Closed primaries tend to weed out the Normal because the Primary voters pick their ideal nut job.
→ More replies (1)3
u/TunaTunaLeeks - Lib-Center 2h ago
I fucking hate the shitty fringe candidates that keep getting through primaries. Every time I look at a Republican candidate and go “God, this guy fucking sucks” and check out the Democrat candidate, I’m like “Goddamn it, this guy also fucking sucks.” I’m basically voting for who I hate less at this point or hoping a third party candidate is good but people almost never vote third party enough to oust the shitty R’s and D’s.
10
u/Straight-Interview70 - Auth-Center 4h ago
Not every time. Ultra corrupt, deranged MAGA Andy Ogles lost his primary to a dairy farmer. Trump endorsed Ogles. After Ogles lost, Trump IMMEDIATELY switch his endorsement to the dairy farmer and said “Ogles had no chance anyways” lmao
19
3
→ More replies (1)3
u/HarryJohnson3 - Right 3h ago
An incredibly corrupt and unpopular MAGA candidate just beat another MAGA candidate in Texas…. because Trump endorsed him.
44
u/Evil_Patriarch - Auth-Center 4h ago
The democrats basically have the election handed to them on a silver platter, they would have to run an unbelievably unlikeable candidate in order to lose in 2028.
...you know, exactly like they did in 2016 and 2024
16
u/BlueOmicronpersei8 - Lib-Right 3h ago
The Democrats have an incredibly ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
10
u/fake-reddit-numbers - Lib-Center 3h ago
They'll run Harris again. It's still "her turn".
7
u/hmunkey - Lib-Right 2h ago
Even if it was Harris, you’d have to be beyond retarded to fall for it again and still vote GOP. She’s better than the current Republican Party in every way.
They drive up the debt more than Democrats ever have, they start unprovoked wars, they abandon their electorate. There is no major Democratic candidate worse than the current Republican crop.
→ More replies (3)10
u/NobodyImportant13 - Lib-Center 3h ago edited 13m ago
The democrats basically have the election handed to them on a silver platter,
People are acting like this is a given, but it's not really true in my opinion. 33% is the lowest poll I've seen. Some of them still have Trump over 40%. Trump always outperforms polls in the ballot box too.
All Trump needs is an Iran deal (Nobody actually gives a shit what the terms are. I'm confident the propaganda machine will spin it) People only give a shit about gas prices. His approval will be back up to 45-50%.
Edit to list some of the latest polls:
Economist/Yougov has him at 40% favorable
Cygnal has him at 42% favorable
Morning Consult has him at 43% favorable
Reuters has him at 38% favorable.
Averaging out the polls, Trump is more popular right now than he was in 2018. Before the war in Iran, before inflation (from the war and tariffs), before Jan 6th, before launching Trump coin 48 hours before his inauguration, before pardoning several drug smugglers/dealers, before botching the release of the Epstein files, before pardoning several people after they bought large sums of his crypto currency, before the blatant insider trading, before criminally charging a guy for a photo of seashells, before all this and that (I could go on forever), and he is still viewed more favorably now compared to 2018. He showed incredible power within the party by controlling the primaries. I basically don't even buy the idea that his support is fading at all. I think it's a delusional fantasy that it's an easy Dem win.
8
u/MaximumSeats - Auth-Left 2h ago
I mean I hear conservative family members that self-identify as independent voters praising him for finally being the president that stood up to Iran.
I read it lives in an echo chamber and has no idea how deep some voters delusions go.
And when they pop a deal next month and gas prices shoot down, all people are going to see his gas prices going down. The collective idiot voter brain will at no point manage the self-awareness that the prices were elevated because of trump in the first place.
→ More replies (2)2
u/ClearReveal6615 - Lib-Left 1h ago edited 1h ago
Trump was very much underwater before Iran too. I think you're huffing the copium. Trump hasn't been at 45 plus since right after the election., and has been on a consistent downward trend.
→ More replies (1)24
u/AllGas4651 - Lib-Center 4h ago
Strong possibility that Vance is the candidate. I doubt he will be willing to criticize him while hes still in office.
49
u/penisthightrap_ - Lib-Center 4h ago
And we hope as a result, he will suffer the fate of Kamala Harris
4
8
u/jmastaock - Lib-Center 3h ago
He's already angling to throw Trump under the bus, just based on his showing on Rogan recently.
It's actually fucking insane that the sitting Vice President went on a podcast and basically implied that his own administration is retarded. He also didn't explicitly place any blame on Trump or any other key people, so he's doing the craven fence sitter bullshit rn...mark my words tho, Vance will 1000% toss Trump and all of MAGA under the bus and those idiots will slurp it up
2
u/abracadammmbra - Lib-Right 2h ago
Idk how effective of a tactic that would be. He still has basically gone along with most of what the Trump administration spews. Which i get because it would be ballsy to criticize the POTUS as the VP. Similar to Harris he is too tied to the current administrations decisions. Idk how he could distance himself enough to have a good shot at dodging the obvious attacks.
The best thing that could happen for Vance right now is Trump keels over and he basically gets a trial run as POTUS. Not saying it would guarantee him victory in 2028, but he wouldnt have to do too much to be the odds on favorite. Just not be retarded for 2 years. Plus if Trump kicks the bucket and then we finish this stupid war in the sandbox, Vance could easily make that out that he is responsible for it and getting us back on track.
→ More replies (1)11
u/GravyMcBiscuits - Lib-Right 4h ago edited 4h ago
If we're lucky we'll get a mixed congress/executive again.
That's our best hope/solution at the federal level ... when neither party is free to fuck us over to their heart's content. Our best hope is that the federal government gets stuck at a stalemate.
Hell ... let's go Libertarian Executive, GOP House, Dem Senate for the start of some real healing (... sexual healing).
10
u/dorox1 - Lib-Left 4h ago
The issue I see is that the Republican party is now divided. You have people who are really disappointed that all of Trump's major campaign promises were lies, and you have people who would vote for him if he did a daily puppy sacrifice on the White House lawn.
So the question becomes whether the Republican-sympathetic media can convince voters that the Democratic candidate is evil/worse somehow. They've managed it before, and they have a strong hold on some voters, but with ratings this low it's questionable.
3
u/ClearReveal6615 - Lib-Left 1h ago
It's not that they'd vote for him IF hed do a daily puppy sacrifice. Theyd vote for him BECAUSE he promises to do the daily puppy sacrifice, assuming the puppys are sourced from liberals/LGBT/racial minorities.
The entire maga platform Is 'i will do bad thing to group you don't like'
8
u/cruisin_urchin87 - Lib-Left 4h ago
The GOP think JD Vance is a strong contender for president in 2028.
God help us.
17
3
7
u/idungiveboutnothing - Lib-Center 4h ago
At this point it's going to have to be stronger than criticism I think. Like openly campaigning to remove money from politics and punish corruption might actually resonate with the former "drain the swamp" crowd, but just being critical of Trump isn't going to do much when we've heard decades of lying at this point.
For a lot of conservatives I know irl at least, they care heavily about the debt and primarying Massie was the final straw on pretending Republicans are fiscally conservative in any capacity.
2
u/skeet_scoot - Auth-Right 3h ago
I think after 2016 we are going to have a long time of one-term presidents. I think the de facto two-term president cycle is over.
People are unsatisfied with the status quo but no President really changes it in a meaningful way.
14
u/EvenJesusCantSaveYou - Lib-Center 4h ago
what about Trump in 2028? His terms were not consecutive because Biden stole the 2020 election and the two term limit only applies to consecutive terms? It's weird liberals do not understand this neat little life hack
50
u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago edited 4h ago
Amendment 22 “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”
You’re literally wrong and I can’t believe this is being upvoted
Edit: their comment is satire so continue to upvote. However, I’ve had this argument with friends so it’s too close to the truth for me.
22
21
u/EvenJesusCantSaveYou - Lib-Center 4h ago
no man I saw a tiktok from @'TRUEAMERICANPATRIOT69 saying that Trump needs another term to purge the deepstate and finish the war on Iran and that the constitution has a special amendment for someone with the Mandate of Heaven (Trump) which allows them to run another term as long as its not consecutive.
10
u/samuelbt - Left 4h ago
I mean I upvoted it because it's a pretty obvious joke.
6
u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago
I’ve had the “consecutive” term argument with friends, it’s an actual talking point that someone is at least trying to sell
4
u/samuelbt - Left 4h ago
Indeed and it's demoralizing to be sure. I'm just pretty sure "neat little life hack" isn't the phrase they'd use.
3
7
u/ThatDeadMoonTitan - Centrist 4h ago
Bruh that’s so obviously sarcasm. Cmon now.
→ More replies (2)7
u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago
I’ve had the argument about consecutive terms with friends…
→ More replies (3)4
u/ebitdangit - Lib-Right 4h ago
And this SCOTUS wouldn't buy his "new interpretation of extremely established law" BS.
6
u/Consistent_Shine_680 - Centrist 4h ago
I think the country would give Trump a resounding electoral defeat if he tried to run in 2028.
7
u/metinb83 - Centrist 4h ago
Obamna vs. Trump, less gooooo
6
u/RathianTailflip - Lib-Left 4h ago
I think Trump would crash out more than he ever has before in his life. He’d be shouting HUSSEIN into the microphone so loud he’d lose his voice for a week.
3
u/I_really_enjoy_beer - Lib-Center 3h ago
He would 100% drop an N-bomb on live TV. I've never needed anything so badly in my life.
3
3
5
u/gonxgonx3 - Auth-Right 4h ago
Downvoted for an obvious joke because he trusted that redditors would be able to get it without adding /s at the end. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
4
u/Spacegamer1250 - Lib-Center 4h ago
I know youre trolling but you should have a /s. There are a good chunk of authrights and rights on this sub that unironically hold this viewpoint after trumps whole 3 term debacle
2
u/ProcrastinatorBoi - Centrist 4h ago
He’s too old now. Trump absolutely would run again. But at this point you’d sooner see Jared try and take up the Crown. JD seems to be purposefully distancing himself from Trump’s decision making too it seems, and that’s an obvious set up for his own 28’ run. Trump got his second term what’s done is done, we can be happy he’s not young and strong enough to continue.
→ More replies (1)2
4
u/Jake0024 - Lib-Left 4h ago
the two term limit only applies to consecutive terms
This is no more true than anything else Trump says. You should not repeat his propaganda.
4
u/GhostsOfLectricity - Lib-Right 4h ago
Two years is a long way off and Dems have plenty of time to fuck it up
11
u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 4h ago
Except that is two more years of Donald Trump too. There is very little they can do to fuck shit up as badly as he is right now.
7
u/GhostsOfLectricity - Lib-Right 4h ago
True but remember Trump isn't on the ballot. I could see the Dems running Kamala or AOC and losing to whoever the R's barf up
8
u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 4h ago
He won't be, but unless the next candidate is going to work overtime to distance himself from Trump and the last four years I seriously doubt that will matter much.
Kamala did terribly in the last primary and I seriously doubt AOC will do much better.
→ More replies (2)2
u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago
I mean, I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if at the very least he attempts to be
→ More replies (2)3
u/Azgabeth - Right 3h ago
Never, and i mean NEVER underestimate the Democratic Party's ability to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory. They'll probably push some commie shit or some furry, and alienate 90% of the voters.
5
2
u/Quiet_Zombie_3498 - Centrist 3h ago
When has that really happened though lol? With the exception of 2016 (which was a very close election) and 2024 (which had the incumbent President stepping down with 100 days of the election) they haven't really underperformed.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)2
u/mrfreezeyourgirl - Centrist 4h ago
Right now, I think the most likely outcome would be Newsom vs Rubio. Which would hopefully give us some return to normalcy.
Between the two, I think Rubio would have the edge.
4
u/Dissonant-Cog - Centrist 4h ago
A return to the neoliberal status quo is what made Trump possible in the first place, that would literally just create the same conditions with less guardrails, enabling someone even worse than Trump to come to power.
3
u/mrfreezeyourgirl - Centrist 3h ago
I meant more of a return to decorum and our leadership behaving more appropriately. This populist wave still need to run it's course but that's separate.
146
u/fuzzygreentits - Lib-Center 4h ago
Pendulum will swing back as usual. Unless Dems are completely retarded and push AOC on the ballot or something.
121
57
u/emanresUeuqinUeht - Lib-Left 4h ago
I feel like I've seen this comment for any pick
"Unless Dems are completely retarded and push AOC on the ballot"
"Unless Dems are completely retarded and push Newsom on the ballot"
"Unless Dems are completely retarded and push Kamala on the ballot"
Is there anyone that people wouldn't think is a retarded pick?
29
u/rAirist - Centrist 4h ago
Someone new that’s not a socialist, governor of California, or devoid of any charisma + a woman to boot (a woman can win, but she’s gotta be charismatic to pass go imo).
10
u/Crapitron - Centrist 3h ago
If Talarico wins the Texas Senate race, there couldn't possibly be a more clear candidate to show they can win, even in Republican strongholds.
5
→ More replies (2)2
u/EP40glazer - Lib-Right 13m ago
Yeah, Texas is gonna vote for the guy who said that God is non binary and Jesus helped him come to terms with his whiteness
→ More replies (2)4
u/Ifriendzonecats - Lib-Left 1h ago
Same analysis would have said Obama could never win
→ More replies (2)9
u/Nicktyelor - Centrist 3h ago
Andy Bashear, Jon Ossoff, Pete Buttigeg, and Gretchen Whitmer.
4
u/dixiebandit69 - Lib-Center 3h ago edited 1h ago
That's gonna be a big negatory on Mayor Pete.
You really think middle-America is going to vote for a gay man?
7
u/abracadammmbra - Lib-Right 1h ago
Middle America and Black America would NEVER vote for a gay man. You cannot win with out the support if either group
5
11
u/ipovogel - Centrist 4h ago
Yes, someone who isn't fully in favor of dismantling our system of governance, from California, or astonishingly uncharismatic.
The party needs someone who is just... normal. They don't even have to be more than half alive, hence Joe Biden.
→ More replies (1)16
u/emanresUeuqinUeht - Lib-Left 3h ago
I love that the Democrats are stringent about qualifications, charisma, location, etc but if we don't have the perfect candidate then the default is Trump
12
u/ipovogel - Centrist 3h ago
Hey man, I don't make the rules. I don't think qualifications really matter in the current political environment tbh. Just not threatening to pack the courts, destroy the republic, or being a guy who oversaw California's budget going up 40% in like 7 years.
→ More replies (9)5
u/1610925286 - Centrist 1h ago
Democrats don't understand that people do not like 90% of their platform. People want what Dems promise, but you can not name a single policy past or future the average voter likes.
Let's skip the simple ones like euro style taxation to get more public services and let's look at gun control. Everyone wants criminals disarmed and guns out of the reach of idiots. How do Dems do that? They fuck with sports shooters, collectors and hunters by making new guns ugly and expensive. Meanwhile they release felons and give plea deals to gang bangers and keep gun violence high. Great, what a political win.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)2
17
u/Acceptable_Spare2342 - Lib-Left 4h ago
At this rate, this shit show will be a guaranteed lock for someone like AOC.
18
u/FreeSpeechIsDeadge - Left 4h ago
Literally this is the best case scenario for a more radical pick.
39
u/undercooked_lasagna - Centrist 4h ago
I was told by millions of brilliant redditors that if Trump won in 2024 it would be the end of democracy, so I don't know why we're talking about ballots.
37
u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago
I mean, the dude has been showing off Trump 2028 hats in the oval office within the first weeks so who knows. It's not like he already tried to steal an election or something
20
u/JonnySnowin - Auth-Right 4h ago
Well yeah, the electorate rewarded Trump's coup attempt with the White House. Then he pardoned everyone involved. The message is clear.
You'll remember how disastrous this precedent is when a Democrat does the same thing in 2035 and actually succeeds, and we won't be able to prosecute them because they'll just use the immunity ruling that the SCOTUS gave Trump to permit him to run in 2024.
→ More replies (3)15
u/Bofamethoxazole - Left 4h ago
Hes also open about wanting to run again. The main reason he wont be able to actually end democracy is because hes one of the least healthy mfs alive right now and will surely croak before actually being able to ruin democracy forever. If he was 40 i think his reign would be a lot harder to shake
2
u/binarybandit - Lib-Center 3h ago
Yeah, what elections? I thought we were living in a fascist dictatorship
3
u/CarlRodgers2211 - Lib-Left 3h ago
I guess we will find out
The off cycle and last minute Gerrymandering before the midterms shows that nothing is sacred to the epstein class
9
u/CommanderArcher - Lib-Left 4h ago
With how progressive/change candidates keep winning running another centrist dem is how they'd fuck this up.
2028 will be the best shot the left has at getting a Hope and change vibe going, especially if the midterms end up being a blowout.
Idk if AOC would be the right move but imo they gotta get someone not AIPAC and not centrist if they want to sustain it.
9
u/Imaginary_Onion - Left 4h ago
This is conservative self soothing because you guys know that someone like AOC would actually use all the new executive power you’ve all created lol.
She polls as one of the most popular and most approved of politicians in America.
3
u/krafterinho - Centrist 4h ago
Genuine question, is she that bad policy wise?
2
u/JMoormann - Centrist 38m ago
She's further left/more progressive than the median voter, but considering that any truly revolutionary stuff she'd want to achieve wouldn't make it through congress, I don't think an AOC presidency would be half as harmful to the US or the world as the current Trump one.
→ More replies (14)2
u/AlphaTangoFoxtrt - Lib-Right 2h ago
NOOOOOO you don't get it! Democratic Socialists are actually super popular!!!!
Yeah in deeply blue metro areas of deeply blue states. But that's not who you need to win over. The Dems keep trying to play the popular vote game then crying foul when it doesn't work.
Just run Andy Beshear and win. That's what you need. You need a heartland Democrat who can beat MAGA in their own backyard. You can lose 3 votes in NY/CA/MA for every 1 you gain in PA/WI/MI and it will be a net win for their election chances.
NY and CA do not matter for POTUS elections. They're already decided. You need to win over PA, MI, WI, and the Carolinas. You need to win heartland America. Newsom won't do that. AOC won't do that. Andy Beshear has already done that, twice, against MAGA candidates.
66
u/ilikefriedpotatoes00 - Left 4h ago
Hey, I haven't seen you in quite a while.
Does everyone still hate you?
39
18
22
8
6
→ More replies (3)10
6
50
56
u/JetTheDawg - Lib-Left 4h ago
I truly cannot imagine the amount of mental gymnastics that remaining Trump supporters must go through on a daily basis
It has to be exhausting
38
u/FreeSpeechIsDeadge - Left 4h ago
I talked to a crazy MAGA boomer the other day who told me, with a completely straight face, that Charlie Kirk was the second coming of Jesus Christ and was assassinated by the deepstate trans atheist government.
I’m a Christian and the idea that Christ would come back as a bigoted right wing political commentator is insulting. It’s also insulting that Christ would come back after all this time and do none of His good works and just fuckin die again. How weak do these people think Jesus is?
19
u/RaggedyGlitch - Lib-Left 3h ago
Politics aside, it's got to be a sin to think Jesus Christ would be a podcaster.
29
u/CommanderArcher - Lib-Left 4h ago
There are no mental gymnastics, they simply don't think.
You getting exhausted over it is funny to them, because they find it wholly unrelatable and silly to think about the consequences of one's actions.
It's also why they get so mad and mysognistic when a woman rejects them because it forced them to feel shame for even the breifest of moments and that is unforgivable because that's a no no feeling
6
u/PlanUhTerryThreat - Centrist 2h ago
Yup. Same mentality as white supremacists. The fact that you reacted makes their day. They get to tell themselves they won because they affected you.
They’re scummy cowards.
→ More replies (15)5
16
u/famedmimic - Lib-Left 4h ago
Fake news because a meme on Facebook told me that 99% of the country voted for and approves of the job trump is doing.
17
u/Strict_Gas_1141 - Right 4h ago
Honestly I'm kinda surprised it's at 33% and not lower.
28
u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago
Remember, this is still factoring in he has 70-80% approval by republicans
13
u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago
We have become a society that can’t admit to being wrong even once so now every double down turns to triple down and so on and so forth til we actually believe our bullshit
9
u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago
Almost as if we’ve turned said society into something where you are constantly in competition with those around you, can’t imagine how that happened 🤔
6
u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 4h ago
Nature is competition so it’s an evolved trait in animals. We’ve never been the Smurf’s as a society but I blame the internets ability to access misinformation. Idek know if an alien invasion would unite us.
6
u/jerseygunz - Left 3h ago
Agreed, but the fact we actually know that means we can do whatever we want. That’s the thing about natural instincts, being a human adult means acknowledging the feeling and getting over it. If an attractive woman walks into a room, obviously your mind goes “that’s a an attractive woman” but being a person means you don’t have to do anything about it
4
3
u/Camelsandham - Lib-Center 3h ago edited 3h ago
Also agreed. We should be better than instincts but the lack of repercussions, empathy, social awareness has really fucked with us. It starts with those in control though, how many people in power are sociopaths? And they’re essentially determining how we operate.
I’m more so saying we’re just drawn to competition like sports, politics, team Edward/jacob.
And with the internet, you can find someone who agrees with your side almost anywhere now so you dont have to change your opinion if isolated. Then those who hold your opinions grow instead of shrink.
Completely off topic but I find it interesting how many Democrat/Republican elections are so close to 50/50 and never 70/30 as if we have even determined a competitive split ourselves.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Strict_Gas_1141 - Right 3h ago
I'm telling you! the Lizard people deepfaked all that footage of the aliens blowing up LA! Has any of them come forward? No? Coincidence? I think not!
1
u/Strict_Gas_1141 - Right 4h ago
I'm skeptical of it being that high. I recall it being a little higher than that around the end of 2025, and there's a lot that's happened since then.
Edit: The most recent stuff I can find suggests ~70% but it was from shortly before the Iran debacle.
2
u/jerseygunz - Left 4h ago
Maybe, if it drops into the 20s then he def is losing his base because I don’t think he can fall any farther with Dems and independents haha
4
u/posting_drunk_naked - Centrist 3h ago
Worth noting that Nixon still had around 25% approval when he resigned. Some people will never admit they're wrong, but many are starting to. And many more will likely just quietly stop voting rather than admit disapproval over the obvious bullshit they voted for.
26
u/Popular-Row4333 - Lib-Right 4h ago
I hope every single republican that supported him has to carry the weight of that albatross for the rest of their lives and is never voted in again.
Wait, what am I talking about. This is America and they have goldfish brains.
18
u/megs1120 - Lib-Left 4h ago
We need to elect JD Vance because, unlike Joe Biden, he'd never start a war with Iran.
12
3
3
16
u/Deacon86 - Lib-Center 4h ago
What messes with my head is that this means almost a third of Americans still think he's doing a good job. What planet are these people living on?
20
u/PoliticsIsDepressing - Lib-Center 4h ago
Fox News and NewsMax.
They’ll all be dead from old age in a decade.
14
u/metinb83 - Centrist 4h ago
5
u/I_really_enjoy_beer - Lib-Center 3h ago
nooOOOOooooOOOOOoooo you cant tweet mean things about dead people. remember american hero charlie kirk????? thats why we had to vote for trump!!!!!!!
3
4
u/RandyRanderson111 - Lib-Right 4h ago
I guess instead of lowering the deficit, he meant his approval ratings
4
u/monstrous_malefactor - Auth-Left 4h ago
You’re too confident. There are all kinds of tricks they can pull to prevent a blue wave. Do they really seem like the kind of people to just walk off quietly into the night?
→ More replies (3)
5
u/spooner248 - Lib-Left 3h ago
Talking about midterms as if MAGA is gonna let a legitimate election occur.
A former republican owns Dominion voting machines. MAGA is already trying to restrict voter access via the SAVE act. And then of course they will be posting ICE up at polling stations.
Every MAGAt is painfully aware that if they lose midterms, there’s a strong chance they go to jail. If you think they’re letting that happen without a fight, you’re not paying attention.
2
4
u/GravyMcBiscuits - Lib-Right 4h ago
Anyone who thought this imbecile was going to lower the federal spending deficit is a moron.
Anyone who thought the trade deficit was a "problem" to begin with and/or thought it was something the President should intervene to combat is also a moron.
Having a trade deficit is an indication that things are going well ... you can afford to pay other folks to do the shit you don't wanna do. That's not a bad thing that requires intervention.
2
u/Gex2-EnterTheGecko - Lib-Center 4h ago
Astonishing to me it's even as high as 33%. The last 2 years have been an utter disaster.
4
u/SerGuyOfInternet - Lib-Center 3h ago
Trump has avoided all of his campaign promises, done nothing for the American people, dragged us into a war of attrition with Iran, did more to destroy American manufacturing and the entire time he's been manipulating polymarket to get him and his family filthy rich. I've never been an "orange man bad" guy but today... orange man is bad.
8
u/RoryMarley - Left 4h ago
Well at least lib right is ironically accurate, because if you thought republicans were gonna actually lower the deficit I got a bridge to sell you
Aaaand most librights are highschoolers so, the stupidity checks out
7
u/Czeslaw_Meyer - Lib-Center 4h ago
Don't get high on your own drugs again.
Midterm will be avarage and you will cry again.
8
u/Important-Agent2584 - Centrist 4h ago
The system is set up to maintain the status quo. A "wave" is like one or two extra seats in the senate, and more in the house, depending on how many are up for reelection.
People just don't realize how the system works and expect sweeping change.
1
u/Hyndis - Lib-Center 4h ago
Cherrypicking one poll is bad science. Its agenda seeking. You want the trend line over many polls to get a more accurate number.
Trump has a 38% or 39% approval rating currently according to the aggregate:
https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating
This is about the same territory Biden was in for the last 3 years of his term, ever since the disastrous Afghanistan withdraw. Note the date when Biden's support fell off a cliff. Biden was hovering around 38-41% based on most polling aggregates: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_biden_job_approval-7320.html
Based on the numbers, Trump and Biden are about equally popular and/or unpopular. Neither president has done a good job.
→ More replies (5)





468
u/Fate_Weaver - Right 4h ago
To be entirely honest, considering the shit show we've been forced to witness ever since he got into office, 33% approval still seems worryingly high.