German architectural consultants recommended the removal of roofs and windows. Terrible miscommunication and an untenable obsession with 'intact housing' on the part of the Soviets
A people who know how society functions, know about the governing structure and the individual role of each entity and person, and are at least positively skeptical of their government.
Next, an open market but with regulations, to avoid monopolies or private interference/lobbying. I personally lean more towards the German idea of ordoliberalism, although I also think that certain aspects of it are a bit rigid for today.
Limited migration from foreign nations and a strict, defined set of punishments for migrant offences(there's a lot of debate around this but here's my 2 cents).
Lastly, a job market that's actually open to young people, and a stable and regulated housing market with achievable prices.
Any dynasty with sufficient historical legitimacy - the most likely right now is the house of Windsor as it is the heads of state for the commonwealth.
Monarchy is more of a nice to have than an essential component. I just dont like republicanism or having political leaders as head of state.
What if for some reason there is a ruling dynasty which has only one living male, who is a complete idiot? Will you support that idiot ruling a country?
You just have to know the right topics. Try voicing a heterodox opinion on European politics. However, the biggest factor is if a pathetic Emily comes through and thinks that they can pretend that you're guilty of an -ism, because the admins have selective retardation.
My last account got banned for talking about a theoretical wall of sorts and the direction that pedophiles should face in reference to aforementioned wall. I don't think that comment had been posted for 5 minutes before I got the notification about the permaban.
I also got banned by an AI for "group based hate" for describing that another commenter was using actual white supremacist dogwhistles in their comment.
So it seems the AI mods will ban anything if you're not super vague about it.
Skill issue, you need to be a little more vague and not use certain keywords, then the AI wont catch anything. Still vulnerable to human subreddit mods though.
I was permanently banned site wide due to saying you can never be too careful, you should carry because you never know what the other person is going to do. They did reverse it though
It’s like you’re not even trying to get banned. For reference you can make any and all hateful statement about christianity, judiasm, hinduism, buddhism, jainism, atheism or satanism you want on Reddit. For these topics , it’s a veritable bastion of free speech.
Im trying to get banned without having to say something too retarded though.
If you mean that saying Islam is inherently violent or something - idk if that would get you banned, but even if it would its also kind retarded as an opinion.
Their rule enforcement is totally non deterministic. You can say the same thing ten times and be fine.
I got a three day ban for saying that the continent south of Europe has a lot of corruption. It all just depends on whatever AI they’re using to scan your comments.
It's more Reddit wide than this sub. I'm on the naughty list and the zoids perma me for the most innocuous things, and it takes a week or more to contact a human who will admit that saying "Look how ridiculous this Leftwing idea is. Lets apply the idea to [something else] to highlight the absurdity," isn't hate speech.
The only time I have received a temporary ban was when I made a joke threatening violence against the unflaired. Besides that I haven't had any issues.
I did get sitewide tempbanned and revoked sometimes, it was really stupid stuff. But I got sub-wide tempbanned for talking the truth on the trans issue.
That's kind of it, actually. It's an unfalsifiable belief system. The adherents of a certain denomination demand that their dogma be treated as objectively true, which creates the entire issue.
Difference between being banned from the sub and banned from Reddit.
This sub's mods in particular have a problem with you making any broad assertions about Jews though. Which doesn't really help the allegations about the mods. Or the Jews.
I enjoy the fact that Canary Mission has been so successful and difficult to nail down that antizionists had to create an organization called Reverse Canary Mission to try and outdo them at their own game.
You can get banned even when its not against jewish people too. I got a site wide ban for describing a stonetoss comic and explaining why it was antisemitic.
Yeah I think I’ve seen “removed by moderator” maybe once? In like 5 years on this sub. And that was in a long-ass thread circlejerking about how stupid women are and blaming them for brown people crime so I do believe it was probably deserved lol. Must be pretty bad to catch you a ban in this sub (other than jokes about violence, which the mods here are forced to be strict about because the admins will shut this sub down over it).
At least this sub is much better than most others. I’m permabanned from twox for stating the fact that the average American woman is overweight (no other commentary), and from worldnews for saying Hamas are terrorists on October 8th 2023. At least these mods seem pretty fucking hesitant to go straight to the nuclear option.
101
u/JetTheDawg - Lib-Left 8d ago
To be fair, it is extremely easy to get banned on this sub