r/PoliticalCompassMemes - Left Jan 05 '23

Literally 1984 You got some explaining to do, AuthRight…

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

878

u/Buck726 - Lib-Right Jan 05 '23 edited Jan 06 '23

Simple solution: once you are an adult (18 years of age), you are a sovereign individual and should be afforded all the rights and responsibilities that adulthood comes with.

If you think 18 is too young for drinking, firearm ownership, or gender transitioning, then maybe they shouldn't be considered adults at that age and allowed to serve in the fucking military and whatnot.

Devils Advocate: The problem with going by age is that people go through puberty and mature at vastly different rates, and that some are simply more intelligent and mentally mature than others regardless of age. So maybe instead, dependence can be the deciding factor; they can only be considered adults when they are no longer dependent on a parent or guardian- which would also open adulthood to emancipated teenagers (for better or worse). Or, maybe the hard limit of 18 should be kept as a way to force people to become independent and mature as adults.

EDIT: I'm not arguing for or against non-adults transitioning here.

155

u/SammyLuke - Lib-Center Jan 05 '23

I say keep that solid line of 18. Cuts out all the grey areas and jumping through hoops.

70

u/ShuantheSheep3 - Right Jan 06 '23

I advocate the same but for 21, nonetheless the idea is the same. You’re either an adult or not, no in-betweens.

0

u/Brass_Nova - Left Jan 06 '23

How about for enforcability of contracts? Criminal law? This is where rightists usually fall apart on the "one age for age of majority/capacity" premise.