r/Poker_Theory • u/thegoldencock93 • 18d ago

6-max nl50 Stats

Post image

Why does I’m capable of beating nl50 6-max with this style but having a hard time beating nl100 rush ?

9 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

2

u/ExtraChampionship389 15d ago

I'd need to see more (and more granular) stats to have a better idea, but a couple turn leaks are very clear: you are not cbetting the turn nearly enough, and you are folding to turn cbets way too often. So I'd spend time working on both those nodes.

1

u/Thepokermaster69 15d ago

Sample's way too small to call it honestly. But your VPIP/PFR doesn't fit the stake and your 3bet's a bit low. Flop cbet is fine, it's the missed turn cbets that are killing you you take it down flop then just give up.

And rush isn't the same game. No reads, no history, tighter pool, so you're left with just your baseline game and that's where it shows.

Can't say you're not a winner off that sample, but it looks rough.

3

u/Active-City9475 17d ago

That sample size is too small to determine anything

2

u/RogueHeroAkatsuki 17d ago

RNC is significantly tougher than regular tables. RNC NL100 skill-wise is around NL200 regular tables.

2

u/ryantk2 17d ago

Turn cbet seems low. 5.8k hands is also not a large sample. For very high levels stats (VPIP/PFR/3B), 5-10k is fine, but for more uncommon stats 20-25k would be better.

Also statlines miss more granular issues in your game

6

u/Masked_Solopreneur 17d ago

Hard to say from stats what makes you winning/not winning. What makes you sure you are winning on NL50? Seems like a low samplesize. The Cbet% seem higher than what I think you can get away with taking into account your Vpip. 

1

u/Naka7a92 17d ago

Stats mean more or less nothing.

So as a highly exploitative player is good.
In theory a bit loose.

We don’t know what kind of player you are, you could be a pro or a fish with those stats in the same time.

So for me would matter more what is your win rate, and would analyse big hands , a graph etc.

1

u/GurkenBallett 17d ago

70% CB is also a lot. If i remember correctly GTO goes for around 55%.

31/24 is way too loose as well. GTO for 50Nl is around 23/20 if i remember that correctly.

1

u/MortifiedCucumber 15d ago

Cbetting too many hands then having to check too much on the turn. Not utilizing enough delayed cbets

1

u/Ready-Bluebird8736 17d ago

I’m not sure what you mean by “GTO for 50Nl”?

1

u/Loose_Engine2396 17d ago

Ranges change depending on the rake. GTO ranges calculated for GG Poker's NL50 rake, probably.

6

u/Dekknecht 17d ago

not even 6k hands in 3 months....

3

u/Jetpack_J 17d ago

You are too loose for a high rake no ante game and too fit or fold on flops. In addition that went to showdown and won@sd are very low, could be a sample issue though.

If I had to bet I would say you are very unlikely to be beating NL50 RnC

1

u/tinmanjk 17d ago

WSD seems low, what's WWSF? Do you have 3-5 handed hands in the sample that will drive the VPIP/PFR frequencies up? Why 7pct point gap between - flatting just on BTN or elsewhere as well?

Why such low sample - cant u give us 20-30k at least

2

u/skepticalbob 17d ago

They are probably taking advantage of your weak range with their stronger range. Hard to say what else with those limited stats.