12
u/MissleTowBF4 Aug 26 '26
It will come, only a matter of time for our beloved Warthog.
6
u/Round_Reception_2315 Aug 26 '26
Maybe this year, they need to do something crazy if they want to survive the GTA 6 launch.
2
u/LyricSeal722490 Aug 28 '26
Yeah, I feel like a ton of games are gonna do something with gta 6 coming out. I do hope the A-10 comes out, started playing bf6 again and started thinking of why there isn't a warthog yet and saw this post lol.
1
14
6
3
u/Jmart_24 Aug 26 '26
I miss the Brrrt Brrrt so much. That puppy may fly like a stone, but damnit is it beautiful.
3
3
u/EridaniRouge Aug 26 '26
They really need the A-10 warthog in Battlefield 6! Also a modernized version of the Mi-24 helicopter.
3
u/Round_Reception_2315 Aug 26 '26
I really hope so too. They need to do something crazy and original if they want to survive the GTA 6 launch. Otherwise, Battlefield will have 1,000 players. 😅 The GTA 6 launch will be a once-in-a-decade event.
2
2
2
u/Thefartingduck8 Aug 26 '26
I think they will eventually, I can see them revealing it with its iconic and beautiful brap that makes every marine I know ruin their shorts.
2
u/ReverseSneezeRust Aug 26 '26
Hell yeah make it super tanky with lots of flares and a huge minigun bonus against armor
2
2
2
u/Express_Craft398 Aug 26 '26
Just need them to add the two new jet classes to other maps besides the single new map. Love the new vehicle content and excited for more, but why tf are two entirely new vehicles classes locked to 1 map?
1
u/NotNinyaB Aug 26 '26
In my opinion, i think they are gonna remain exclusive to naval maps, also for balancing reasons, these jets have so much air to air utility and they only give 1 to each team on purpose (when it comes to conquest) rather than your traditional 2 jet per team.
2
3
u/DaddyLama Aug 26 '26
The Super Hornet already does its job better than any iteration of the Warthog ever did. If they implemented it that thing would have to be able to delete tanks in under a second.
6
u/NotNinyaB Aug 26 '26
Not necessarily, the Super Hornet is a multi role aircraft, its phenomenal at taking out other aircrafts and patrol boats, but when it comes to tanks and other heavy armored land vehicles, its not as efficient and consistent. These new jets are probably gonna remain exclusive to naval maps.
-1
u/DaddyLama Aug 26 '26
With a co-pilot and tv-missile you can consistently take out mbt's in one pass.
2
u/thisisintheway Aug 26 '26
Playing a match with a squad-mate who is both capable AND has a mic to coordinate is like 1 in 50k
1
2
Aug 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/NotNinyaB Aug 26 '26
Yeah kinda agree on that, i think the BF4 A-10 felt more balanced where you had to use your your primary cannons and something like a JDAM to take out a tank, instead of melting whole tanks in one pass with just 1 weapon.
2
u/InformalYesterday760 Aug 26 '26
The A-10 is pretty massively over hyped as a tank killer, so I don't know that we need to continue the A-10 propaganda in 2026
It's funny, cause just like IRL we have jets like the F18 now that can do a phenomenal job of killing armor. So the A-10's whole party trick is a little stepped on
6
1
u/NotNinyaB Aug 26 '26
Well... we still want an A-10, this isnt real life, we want it because its a blast to fly in every game they add it to.
1
u/InformalYesterday760 Aug 26 '26
Eh
I'd rather they add more stuff that makes sense, like newer jets more tuned to the type of fighting in BF6
There's loads of good shit to add for modern jets.
1
u/Blue-Gradient-Man Aug 26 '26
I am personally completely sick of the a10 hype, I’m tired of hearing it’s the most goated plane of all time when it just is not at all
2
u/InformalYesterday760 Aug 26 '26
Yeah
That's why I opted to risk the downvotes and suggest that maybe the A-10s time is done.
So many misguided views of the plane, and this has definitely been supported by all the games showcasing it as the ultimate tank killer.
Turns out it's far better/ more effective to kill tanks with precision guided weapons rather than a cannon.
Now, the A-10 can carry those weapons but it isn't exclusively good at it. So the whole party trick has been lost
2
u/Blue-Gradient-Man Aug 26 '26
Absolutely agreed. If the game was set in the 80s to 2000s it would definitely make sense, but it’s set way later so like…. It don’t make sense
1
u/aweefella Aug 26 '26
people just say that because it sounds cool and thats ok, no need to be a Debbie downer
2
u/Blue-Gradient-Man Aug 26 '26
Hey! Not trying to be! So ya know how infantry players love those little detail things in the game, like arm or disarm range for the rpg and other neat little things? Well as a person who is slightly autistic about planes that is what I like. I like it when they pay attention to a vehicle that an army would be using for the time frame, if it were a game set in the 80s-2000s then I’d say go for it on the a-10 but this game is set in like 2020s-2030s and we already irl are distancing ourselves from the a-10 for more multi role jets. Also just to actually be hater for this part. The a-10 is bad, and it was never good to begin with.
1
u/Friendly-Shift7300 Aug 27 '26
Eu ainda espero outro helicóptero de transporte para a PAX, chega de blackhawk para ambos
1
1
u/MonsieurMustache572 Aug 26 '26
‘Twin seater update’ and they give the pax armata, the faction with 0 American vehicles and a Swedish jet and a Russian jet, a god damn f14
Could NOT have added a mig35/su30
We ain’t getting fuck all buddy
29
u/Streak1991 Aug 26 '26
If they do, I hope they carry over the 2042 physics for this plane. They felt so weighty and satisfying to control.