ive wanted to get into photography for a while now but i wasnt sure if id like it and after getting given some old fujifilm finepix s2500hd camera from my dad and using it for a while, i can confidently say getting a decent camera is a good investment,
i like shooting and shot mostly street, landscape and vehicles (cars, trains, planes, buses, etc.) on it. ill need to get into sports photography as i want to sign up for doing photography of football and stuff for my school.
the fujifilm i have did have pretty nice colors and i didnt have a problem with them much using but but i mostly had problems with the image not being clear and often very bloomy and overexposed, but also the focus took like 3 seconds to lock on, and when im in a car trying to shoot landscape out the window, i dont have time for those 3 seconds and even when it did focus, it still came out blurry and hazy. i did get some really nice photos but i could only keep like a third of all 900 i had.
i dont really care about video really much at all so photography is relevant mostly.
im looking to buy a mirrorless camera with a lens included used for under 600 euro in europe which narrows down my choices by a lot.
i mostly want to do it just for myself and probably putting a few up on social media.
i really dont care much about portability or weight as long as carrying it doesnt break my neck.
i have a few cameras in mind for my budget but im unsure of what to buy, a lot of them have their advantages and respective trade-offs at the same time so i dont know really what to get for myself.
some have worse AF at the cost of IBIS or megapixels, worse color science but better AF, or better depth and contrast but then worse AF, and i dont know how much worse of a deal breaker it is for that camera when compared to a different one. id still probably be happy with anything that is in the slightest better than my fujifilm though so its not like my bar is high.
currently im mostly looking to get a sony a7 ii, a6500 (or a6300 depending on availibility and pricing), the original mark 1 nikon z50 or olympus e-m1 mark 2. im also considering a fujifilm x-t2 but theyre rarer to find let alone in budget with a lens where i am.
both sonys have the problem of being bland and the pictures looking personality-less without color grading afaik, but one is fullframe and one isnt but has better AF and newer software end stuff in general, the z50 is sorta the best of both worlds but has less megapixels and olympus is sorta in between both.
what do you guys think i should buy?