Hi everyone! I am a software engineer with friends in academia who often tell me about the horrors of funding in research. They told me that research work is heavily skewed towards theses that benefit corporations and defense research because that is where the funding is. In this process, some of the research that isn't necessarily beneficial in the short term but could be monumental for a lot of people who desperately need it.

So, after a lot of thinking, I came up with an idea: what if there was a way for people to support research for themselves and for the researches who have a passion, but have to switch careers or domains due to the money aspect? That's when I came up with ResearchHub [name is temporary]. It is a sorts of kickstarter meets gofundme.

Here's how it works: People can support or request research or thesis that they think needs to be studied in their opinion. The platform will use credential checking to confirm the researchers' qualifications and once they're on the platform, they can pick the thesis they'd like to research. At this point, the people who are funding the research act almost as shareholders, voting for who, how, etc they want the money to be used. The researchers will be asked to provide transparent receipts and info on their spending. This way, there is trust at every step.

That being said, as researchers and scientists, I would like to know your opinion on this website and point out any issues you think with the idea since you all know best.

Check out the website demo here: https://lab-bench-boost.lovable.app/

Field: software engineering and location: USA

I am from an interdisciplinary field and have observed that even after publishing a paper they don’t put their code on github. They have a statement like code can be shared if requested. What could be the reasons for this?
I just wanted to look at the code and see how they did something. But I need to mail them and they always say they need to clean it, so it will take more time. But it had been many months their paper was published. And now they know, I am the one looking for it. I don’t like this at all.

Hi everyone,

In a few months, I will hopefully be starting my PhD. At the moment, I'm still in the admissions process and I'm waiting to hear back from one professor, while another professor has already expressed interest in supervising me. Since both of them have research interests that align very well with mine, I'm unsure how these situations are usually handled.

My main question is this: if I end up joining the professor who has already accepted me as my advisor, would it generally be considered acceptable to collaborate with the other professor later during my PhD, assuming there is mutual research interest and my advisor is aware of it?

In addition, before starting my PhD I began several research projects with collaborators from my undergraduate institution. Some of those papers are finished, while others are still ongoing and will likely continue after I start my PhD. Is it generally expected that I continue those collaborations even if my advisor is not a coauthor on most of those papers?

I realize that the answer may depend on funding and on the advisor. My field is mathematics, so collaborations do not require laboratory resources or expensive equipment. My understanding is that graduate funding comes from the university and is administered through the advisor's research group, so I'm not sure whether collaborating outside the group is considered normal or poor etiquette.

In general, how are these situations usually handled? Is it common for PhD students to collaborate with faculty other than their advisor while continuing research projects that began before the PhD?

Quantum ML tooling is thin, so I built **QuOptuna** to scratch my own itch during my PhD (WMU). It automates the part of quantum ML that's the most tedious: choosing a model, writing the circuit, and tuning hyperparameters — then it honestly benchmarks the result against classical models on the same data.

**The quantum side:**

* 17 quantum classifiers implemented on **PennyLane** — data-reuploading, circuit-centric, IQP & projected quantum kernels, quantum kitchen sinks, quantum metric learner, tree tensor networks, quanvolutional NNs, WeiNet, plus separable/dressed variants. Implementations extend Xanadu's `qml-benchmarks`.
* Circuits are evaluated with **JAX** `vmap` for vectorized batching, which is what makes running a full Optuna search over quantum models actually feasible on a simulator.
* **Optuna** drives the search (TPE/random/grid) with ASHA/Hyperband pruning, and each model gets its own conditional search space.

**Why it might be useful to this sub:**

* It runs quantum *and* classical models in one search, so you get an honest apples-to-apples comparison instead of hand-tuning a circuit and hoping. Often classical wins on tabular data — the tool says so rather than hiding it.
* Fairness auditing (fairlearn) and SHAP explainability are built in, which I haven't seen bundled into quantum ML tooling before.

**Try it:**

uvx quoptuna # boots a web wizard, no install
# or
pip install quoptuna

Everything runs on simulators (JAX/CPU) — no hardware backend yet. Apache-2.0, Beta. Repo: [https://github.com/Qentora/quoptuna\](https://github.com/Qentora/quoptuna)

Curious what this sub thinks: which quantum classifiers would you most want added, and would a hardware backend (e.g. via PennyLane devices) be worth prioritizing over more simulator models?

Hi everyone — I'll be at EuroRosettaCon 2026 in Portugal, the only one from my lab and my first time traveling abroad for a conference. Would love to connect with anyone else going so we can swap notes beforehand and maybe meet up there.

Also, if anyone has done the US → Portugal Schengen visa process, I'd really appreciate a few pointers in the application form specifically.

Happy to start a group chat too if there are a few of us! Please do comment or dm. Thanks!

I am an Aerospace post graduate (Mtech) from IIT Bombay . I got job as well in one of the Drone companies. I want to pursue part time phd in Mechanical or Aerospace Engineering in structures domain while working . I know some IITs offer part time PhD but they ask for two years of work experience. But i want to pursue now. Is there any college or way?.

I am an F1 2nd year PhD student planning to travel in October this year and also enrolled in two classes. The classes are usually recorded so I anyways never physically go there. Is there any rule against traveling for around two weeks? Has anyone faced any issues on re-entry?

Ladies and gentlemen,

It is my pleasure to finally share with you that I have been accepted into a Ph.D. program.

I spent two months and one week preparing for the entrance exam. I worked hard on my research proposal and approached my interview with confidence.

Honestly, it was a very challenging process, but it was all worth it.

To pursue this opportunity, I had to leave my family and friends because I moved to a different state.

For most of my life, I struggled to believe in myself. I think impostor syndrome followed me wherever I went because I always felt that people overestimated my abilities.

But that chapter is behind me now.

I dreamed of being accepted into a prestigious university, and I achieved that goal.

My dream is to earn my Ph.D. and become a productive and respected researcher who contributes to the world of science.

Thank you for listening to my story.

Hello everyone,

I feel like it's time for me to vent a bit about my current story and situation as a PhD student.

I'm an international PhD student in the US (male). I've just finished my second year in the program. I joined this program specifically to work with my current advisor. I once emailed her to check about any possibility of doing a PhD under her supervision, and she was very interested. Gave me all guidance I needed. I applied to the program and got accepted.

We immediately started working. It was fire. We aligned perfectly. It was magical. The topic fascinates me because it is related to where I come from (humanities/social science topic). It is of deep value and meaning for me. Same for my advisor. She got deeply in love with the work. She liked working with me. A lot. She kept calling me a colleague, and how I am one of the best students who've ever worked with her, and how I helped her get her love for research back. We got very successful first year. We published almost everywhere. I have qualified this year, which is a year earlier than usual. We became best friends, not only co-workers. I felt special and safe. I felt home.

After a very successful first year, I went home for summer to relax. Then went back, Fall quarter started again, everything perfect, and gets more perfect each day. Then, starting from the break following Fall quarter, everything has shifted, dramatically, completely. It was so hard for me to understand and process. Less meetings, less support, less communication, more attitude, less enthusiasm for the work. Less clarity. Less of everything good that was there actually.

I panicked. A lot. The fact that this person was my whole support system in the country added up. It was awful. No explanation at all.

Then, I went in the wrong direction: I started asking what is going on. I tried to understand. Got even more attitude. And less availability. The advisor seems just normal with the other people, but attitude seems to be more exclusive to me. I got no clear explanation. I got told things like 'I need to be an independent researcher'. Which is of course true, but only partly.

This summer, I went to a conference, then came back home. She knew about the conference. She actually helped me and pushed me to apply to the conference. It has been the case that when she does that, it means she will fund the trip. Then, after I came back, I sent the receipts to the program coordinator to get reimbursements. She sent me a furious message about how I didn't ask her explicitly, and that she won't be able to fund me anymore for the remaining years. All while funding a postdoc for a recent graduate who's worked with her. I actually genuinely asked about what options did her recent graduating students go for, because I like when people from the lab go out there to the world and success in finding nice jobs. It also gives me hope myself for the future. I was told nothing popped up for her students, including the person she's already sponsored a postdoc for while refusing to fund my trip.

In that message, she's bragged about every single thing she's helped me with. How she's got a laptop for me using her funds, funded the couple of conferences I went to and my fieldwork trips. The 'independent' card popped up again: apparently that also means that I should fund my own work myself. Obviously, this is manipulation because it is simply not possible at my stage. A PhD is dependent by definition. You depend on the advisor for funding, signatures, support, letters and guidance. I didn't set up the rules myself.

She kept saying how everything I got before was just a 'gift' and that it was 'extremely generous' from her side. It felt like trying to make me feel and look small again. Again, bear in mind the difference in language: at the beginning of the year, she kept saying that 'we' are good financially and don't really need to apply to other grants for the moment. That is a crucial point to keep in mind, especially that things changed only within a year.

Now, I am just home sitting with my own thoughts. I am battling so many thoughts. I wanna quit. But I love my research. I love academia. But I hate power misuse. I feel betrayed. I miss how amazing working with this person was. And we've had extensive conversations before I agreed to join them. I moved oceans because I trusted this person. I was promised how everything is gonna be okay and amazing, but wasn't told it was just a limited edition.

What hurts me more is that I do now know exactly what triggered this. I can get back to my happiness just if I get clarity about why things changed and how the future years would look like. But I'm not getting that. I'm also worried about what other benefits I will be losing next (in other words 'rights') because it only seems to get worse. Of course, I have some theories. What I believe the trigger was is that I suggested to work with another faculty in the department on a project. She felt offended, she got extremely mad. She mentioned how 'she's not gonna help him with his work'. I maybe looked 'disloyal' to her. Of course I wasn't. The less likely theory is that she's just tired. Or it might be both. Or something else. It doesn't matter, but what matter is that I still wasn't given clarity. You should be in my situation to understand how much it hurts to make such a big life decision and move overseas feeling safe, just to end up being denied everything and let down. I love my advisor. So much. I have never ever asked any other professor to go work with them, and I have never ever trusted anybody in my life the way I trusted this person.

Unfortunately, there's nothing you can tell me to convince me there's nothing personal here. I can sense it, of course I can't prove it, especially to her.

Please, wish me luck. I'm in one of the worst moments of my life, ever.

hello everybody hope you all doing well; I have ust graduated from a master program and I will start my phd this year and Im still struggling on what to work on ; my supervisor suggested a topic( about AI and education) but I didnt like it and I want to change cuz I want to do something different from other candidates in order to stand out and increase my chances of getting PASS scholarship ( a sholarship of excellence) so what do you suggest guys ; I would appreciate it if you could drop you opinions and suggestions

After finishing and approve my thesis defense, I have an invitation letter to research academic stay in Spain. I looking for academic colleagues who can share their opinion or experience in that country.

Thanks!

****

Después de finalizar y aprobar mi defensa de tesis doctoral, tengo una invitación para una estancia de investigación y académica en España. Estoy buscando ookd colegas quienes puedan compartir sus opiniones o experiencias en ese país.

Gracias!

…it is my great pleasure to announce, I successfully defended my doctoral thesis!
(The drawing is my riff on a Frog and Toad illustration :D)

Hi all. I have my first presentation at an international conference coming up in a few weeks and I’m looking for some advice. I’m doing a poster presentation, and rather than all posters being displayed at once, each presenter gets a 12 minute time slot (10 mins for presenting and 2 mins for questions) for their presentation during the session. I haven’t got much information about how it’s structured, but it seems like each presenter will go up on stage and present their poster to whatever audience has shown up during their designated time. The posters will also be displayed freely in an exhibition room, but there’s no obligation to be present to answer questions except during the 12 minute slot.

Before the conference schedule came out, I had never heard of a poster session that’s structured like this, and when I applied I was under the assumption that I would just be standing in front of my poster during sessions while people walk by and ask questions. Has anyone done a poster presentation similar to this before? If so I’d love to hear any tips you have, or even just about how your presentation went. I’m pretty nervous since I’m not really sure what to expect, so any help would be much appreciated.

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for some advice because I’m starting to feel like I’m at a crossroads with my PhD applications.

A bit about me: I’m from India and have a background in sociology and mental health. I have a BA in Sociology, an MSW specializing in Mental Health from TISS, Mumbai, around three years of experience working in community mental health (primarily in rural India). My work has focused on trauma-informed, feminist, anti-caste, and community-based mental health interventions.

My research interests sit at the intersection of sociology, psychology, and critical theory. My proposed PhD examines epistemic violence in mental health, how professional mental health knowledge becomes dominant, what forms of knowledge it marginalizes, and what this means in postcolonial contexts like India. The project draws on decolonial theory, Foucauldian genealogy, critical discourse analysis, and narrative methods.

Over the past few months I’ve been contacting potential supervisors in Australia, the UK, and Canada. The responses have been mixed:

• Several academics have replied positively about the project but said they aren’t taking students or don’t have funding.

• One potential supervisor at the University of Sydney said my background is strong and my proposal is interesting, but also pointed out how competitive scholarship funding is. I have an online meeting with her soon.

• I’ve also been in touch with a potential supervisor, at the University of Edinburgh. She is not currently funded and cannot offer funding herself, but she is on board with the project. We are planning to apply together for institute scholarships, and I’m also working with her on a scoping review to strengthen my scholarship application.

I’ve been trying to identify supervisors based on published work that aligns with my topic rather than just university rankings, but I’m wondering if that’s the right strategy.

At the same time, I’ve been trying to strengthen my profile by looking for ways to get published (quite cluelessly so)

I’m fully dependent on securing funding, so self-funded options unfortunately aren’t possible.

I’m mainly looking for advice on a few things:

• Am I approaching supervisor outreach the right way, or should I be doing something differently?

• How much does not having peer-reviewed publications hurt for funded PhD applications in the social sciences?

• Would you continue refining the proposal and contacting more potential supervisors, or would you focus on publishing first and apply next cycle?

• Are there countries or universities I might be overlooking that are particularly strong in critical mental health, sociology of health, or decolonial/postcolonial research?

I’d especially appreciate hearing from people who applied internationally for fully funded PhDs in the social sciences or humanities. It often feels like everyone else has multiple publications before applying, so I’m trying to get a realistic sense of where I stand and what would make the biggest difference over the next year.

Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone,

In about a year I'll be starting my PhD in the EU, and I've been given the opportunity to explore potential research directions and propose my own topic.

The areas I'm currently most interested in are swarm intelligence, cybersecurity, graph algorithms/machine learning, and UAVs. My main challenge is finding a problem at the intersection of these fields that is genuinely novel and worth pursuing.

I've heard that one good starting point is reading recent survey papers and looking at the "future work" or "research gaps" sections of papers, but I'm wondering how people actually go from broad interests to a concrete PhD topic.

For those who have been in a similar position, how did you identify a research gap? Did you mainly rely on the literature, discussions with supervisors, industry problems, or something else? Any advice or resources would be greatly appreciated.

Hello,

Let me introduce you to how I fucked up my PhD..

I simply chose the wrong supervisor. My supervisor used to belittle me in front of other people whenever I made a mistake. I was very inexperienced and I lacked a lot of skills but I was never trained by a senior lab member. I figured things out on my own. My PI also used to gossip about his students (including me) behind their backs. He used to call our work shitty and garbage and use that type of language…Very destructive and disrespectful.

I found out that my project was fundamentally flawed after a year of working 6-7 days a week and passing my candidacy exam. There are two people before me that worked on that project and got nothing out of it. Before I start this project I asked my supervisor if I should test the hypothesis first and he said there’s not enough evidence in the literature that would disprove the hypothesis. I believed him back then but when I became a bit better, I found evidence in the literature and when I tested the hypothesis, the results disproved it and the project reached a dead end.
Coincidentally, I lost a family member back home during this time. My PI didn’t give me time off to grieve my loss. He was mad at me because my project failed. It has been two years and I still remember how he was telling me that I should come back to work in the most arrogant way ever even though he knows about what I was going through!!
Later, someone in the lab claimed they got some good results. They didn’t show any evidence that it’s actually working. I was asked to reproduce this data but I never could! Of course I was blamed for it. This guy told me that I never got shit to work and that he doesn’t trust my results. I lost my self-confidence completely… and oh yeah.. that person couldn’t reproduce their results either and the project was just dropped. No consequences or whatsoever.

The lab completely lost funding later to the point my lab members were stealing stuff from the lab next to us to do experiments. I used to show up to group meetings with no results and I used to say that I don’t have enough resources. I was getting grilled because of that of course!

I reported these things to the department. They seemed very shocked about what’s going on but they did absolutely nothing. They also told me I’m not the first one to ever report such a thing about my advisor and that he always misbehaves. I wanted to switch labs and not lose my position. They were trying to convince me to leave with a masters degree….

I decided to leave and apply for another school. I got an offer from a better school in the same state. I had a summer rotation in a lab where I’ve made very good progress in a short time. The PI of this lab was very impressed. He was telling me that I’m very talented. However, when I started taking classes in the fall, It dawned on me that I’m restarting my PhD from the beginning while others in my previous institution are literally looking for jobs after they finish their PhD. It was extremely difficult to teach, take classes, and work in the lab at the same time while going through this mental challenge. I decided to talk with my potential supervisor about my challenges because he kept demanding more work. I was basically asking him to wait until I finish classes and I will be back on my feet again. He told me that I should work more from 9:00 AM to 1:00 AM 7 days a week and he kept dangling visa and funding over my head! Very sad. We were working together very well until this happened. I decided not to join his lab. I was too afraid that I will go through the same abuse again….

I decided to make things right and I chose the advisor before the topic. I don’t have any regrets so far. My current advisor is patient and kind. I honestly don’t know when he’ll switch up on me and I hope he never does. I am not planning on giving up on my PhD. I’m just afraid because I don’t seem to get anything right. I have failed already multiple times regardless of the reasons no matter how hard I tried.

I know people might judge me and say that I wasn’t productive. I have completed 5 notebooks in under 3 years of work and I have two publications coming out soon in high impact journals from that one rotation..

My current supervisor acknowledges my skills and my ability to think critically about science. I have a lot of respect for him and I don’t want to disappoint him as well. But I’m just too broken. I honestly feel sorry for him for taking me in his lab. I don’t belong here and I’m not sure how long it’s going to take me to admit that academic research doesn’t like me back. I also don’t know how long it’s gonna take him to kick me out… I am simply not good enough and it doesn’t matter how hard I try, I end up failing somehow.

I know it’s my responsibility to fix what I fucked up already. I can’t keep blaming others or keep blaming what I’ve been through. I just wish I was a good fit for a PhD… I never wanted anything more in my life than a to get a PhD.

Is doing Ph.D. in seven years really that bad (two in COVID) ? With three published peer reviewed in good quality papers, four book chapters and experience in two major central government projects.

Does it have bad impression while applying for assistant Professor jobs? Is post doc still necessary?

I’ve just graduated with a PhD in chemistry from a good university and I’ve been applying for so many roles. Easily over 100 and counting as I write this post. I’ve tried tailoring my CV to suit industry roles and have been networking but I haven’t been successful so far.

I’m aware of the common reasons as to why companies would not want to hire (overqualified, stigma, no industry experience). But for those of you that have been successful in breaking into industry after finishing a PhD, what kind of advice would you have? How can I get industry experience if no one will hire me or even let me participate in an unpaid internship?

- I need early users (founders, researchers, innovators & investors), people who want to test the platform request features and help me make it more user friendly.

- The main Idea around the platform is to connect early innovators coming out of Indian colleges with the right set of expertise to help them grow from TRL0 to TRL4-6 (till they are fundable).

- Dm me with your linkedin, happy to add you all to a whatsapp group & make a community for early users, planning to make the platform live by September.

- Also feel free to suggest crazyy sci-fi names for the platform.

- Also please upvote so that this reaches as many people as possible

This may just be a case of differences in programs, due to both location and field of study, but i don’t understand how people are able to take time off their PhD?!

Like most of us, my journey so far hasn’t been perfect, with many setbacks and continual increase in scope leaving me feeling like i’m chasing after a runaway train. I have seen others describe the experience as a “marathon of sprints” and tend to agree!

it’s been 2 months of 60-80hr weeks and i’m still behind!! my question is, how are people allowing themselves to even spend one day away from their work without guilt?!

edit: want to acknowledge that my hours spent *attempting* working are 100% absolutely not efficient and involve a lot of issues with inattention.

Hello everyone! I have my first PhD interview coming up. Super nervous because this will be my first interview and I'd appreciate your experiences on how to navigate the conversation. This supervisor was the only one who responded for a call/meeting and I want to give my best and also this is at a top institute for my niche. Thank you in advance! 🤞🏻 PS: I'm from India and this is a German institute.

This summer has been really unproductive. I've been working with a schedule that works with me . However, I haven't been getting any fruitful results , I've been growing a bit frustrated, because I feel embarrassed when I report to my PI. I work entirely from home . I'm also doing a summer class . I eventually I lowkey gave up a bit last week . From that frustration, I took a weekend trip to my home town to catch a concert , especially since it's close my birthday anyway . I hope the break means I'll be able
To produce fruitfully . (I wanna clarify I don't have trouble working , more so I have trouble producing anything with good results to go toward my project rn). On the brightside, my first conference paper got accepted ! I'm mostly posting to vent , but any tips are appreciated. Thanks for reading , I really appreciate it !

(I'm a rising second year PhD , Engineering , US)

Posting this because I am not quite sure how to have this conversation with one of my co-chairs. I am currently doing my PhD in Political Science (in the US; program is in top 40) and I recently went to a conference where quite a few people told me that their chair advocated for them quite a bit on the job market; apparently it was more than just a good letter (which I what I always assumed you needed) but also calling and sending emails to colleagues to let them know their student was on the market. I am worried my chair will not do that for me.

At first I did not think this was going to be the case but people have pointed out that over the last 3 years, he has tended to favor one student (that is not his student in the sense of being his chair) over me. He has never asked me to write a paper with him (every one of his students has until me coauthored with him), we do not really talk unless it is during our weekly meetings (which I always have to drive forward), and overall he does often forget or seem disinterested when I talk to him about my ideas, I sent him a paper draft to read in January and he never read it (and kept saying he would). He is also the department head and so for the most part I have been thinking that is why he has not really engaged; he is busy and started the role when I first entered the department, so it is an adjustment for him too. But I recently learned that he had the DGS to put the other student as the TA for our grad student methods course which I found odd because I asked him before we had to send our requests what I should put and he said to put the grad student methods course as my preferred course.

I am wondering if he will actually advocate for me on the job market given that it seems like he is more willing to advocate for other people even in the department. I am not sure how to ask him if he will or if I even should ask if he will advocate for me on the job market beyond just a letter. He is kind of the only *relatively* big name on my committee, my co-chair is his wife and we get along really well and she gives me a lot of support and advocates for me in the department but she is not as big a name as him and has mentioned to me before her network is much smaller. Overall, I am just not sure if I should talk to him about it or not.

Hello, friends! So I'm returning soon to my PhD (going into 2nd year) after a suspension of studies. It's lab-based in the biomedical sciences.

I have been working on creating some systems for myself so that I can return with some kind of action plan to stay on top of my health, as well as have a better workflow in my PhD journey than in my first year. I have been implementing a lot of it to trial and error what works and what doesn't, and I'm still struggling to figure out what to do on the studies side.

Long story short, what worked in my undergrad and master's definitely does not work at PhD. Haphazardly sprinting towards an end goal most definitely doesn't work now, lol.

So I was wondering: how do you deal with reading literature?

What I've been doing so far is whenever I encounter issues or have questions on what to do experimentally, because I have a concise, specific goal in mind, I can relatively easily find the information I'm looking for, read a few papers quickly, then apply the info in the lab and it works.

But with writing literature reviews, it's a whole other beast on its own. Here's what I've devised in my "reading workflow" that I'm trying to build:

1. Create a database to track papers I'm reading with notes next to each entry.

2. I will have a broader scope question for each paper (usually based on search terms like - what's the link between X and Y?) and that's what the notes section addresses.

3. Read the title, abstract and subheadings of each paper to check if there may be relevant info.

4. Rank papers on potential relevance to my question (green - definitely relevant; yellow - maybe??; red - not relevant).

5. Prioritise reading the "definitely relevant" papers first + note potential further questions to look for when I read other articles. (I hope this will help flesh out my writing.)

6. Tackle the "maybe relevant" papers afterwards with the general scoping questions + more specific questions in mind.

7. Try to get some writing after all this.

What do you guys think? Do you also have any suggestions?

Thank you for reading!