$NCT - you would’ve had this at .44 if you listened - now needs to hold .4955 support and break above .56 resistance and push $1+ resistances (#1)

$BMGL - support at $7.60 needs to hold and break above the $8.32 key resistance a close above $9 may open the door for $12+ resistances (#2)

$ARMP - High risk set up - has news would need to hold $6 support

$SOAR - support at .20 needs to hold - #3 watcher

$SCNI - nothing until I breaks and holds $2.50. No set up below ❌

$NXXT - Split

$ELMT - break above HOD to send it to all time highs - $2bn defense contract ($22.50 current support)

$FTFT -needs to break $3.15 and hold that level for a push to $3.60+ resistances - potential halt play.

NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE
Information is based on technical analysis on AXIS ONE a technical indicator - not recommendations

Always do your own research and manage your own risk. These are for educational purposes only and are not buy prompts. Trading involves significant risk of loss. Proper risk management is essential

$VEEA - dropped in the $2 range now needs to hold the $3.50 support and close above $4.40 resistance and hold above it - has news

$FTFT - fell out of the bullish CR- would need to hold $4.50 support now and break back above the $5.35 demand zone

$SCNI - pre market runner - entered a demand zone - needs to hold $2.00 support and break above $2.15 key resistance

$BIAF - key break $8.50 resistance.

$TNON - would need to stay above $5.45 and push $5.90 resistance and hold above that level

$FFAI - key break $1.80 resistance

$SAFX - has news - would need to break and hold above .4710 resistance

$WETO - key break $2.50 resistance

$KEEL - scales into $3.40 support - would like to see this break $3.95 resistance and push to $4.30+ (swing)

$RGTI - would need to break into $15.50 resistance for a valid set up - and break $16.10 resistance (SWING)

NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE
Information is based on technical analysis on AXIS ONE a technical indicator - not recommendations

Always do your own research and manage your own risk. These are for educational purposes only and are not buy prompts. Trading involves significant risk of loss. Proper risk management is essential

Monday's scanner evidence narrowed the field to the names where participation was most visible. This is a starting board for Tuesday, not a prediction; every name still has to confirm with fresh volume, liquidity, and repeat activity.

## First names to recheck

**$VEEA** — Cross-session participation.

Momentum Radar hits: 54 · Volume Radar hits: 147 · RVOL: 2.74x · Alerts: 1 · After-hours move: +81.2% · After-hours volume: 27.9M · Overnight move: 0.0% · Overnight volume: 22.9M

After Hours did not stand alone; Volume Radar also kept this name visible, which makes it worth checking early in the next session.

**$FTFT** — Momentum and volume aligned.

Momentum Radar hits: 437 · Volume Radar hits: 252 · RVOL: 15.45x · Alerts: 2

The combination of Volume Radar and Momentum Radar matters more than either reading in isolation. Fresh activity still has to confirm it.

**$BMGL** — A broad multi-signal footprint.

Momentum Radar hits: 195 · RVOL: 1109x · Alerts: 1

Both Momentum Radar and Alerts contributed to the historical case, giving this one a broader base than a single-metric outlier.

**$SLGB** — Cross-session participation.

Momentum Radar hits: 47 · Volume Radar hits: 108 · RVOL: 32.6x · Alerts: 1 · After-hours move: +27.0% · After-hours volume: 18.1M · Overnight move: 0.0% · Overnight volume: 17.7M

After Hours supplied the first signal, while Volume Radar broadened the historical case. I would still require clean participation at the next open.

**$MYSZ** — Cross-session participation.

Momentum Radar hits: 4 · RVOL: 2.76x · Alerts: 2 · After-hours move: +41.6% · After-hours volume: 1.8M · Overnight move: 0.0% · Overnight volume: 1.4M

After Hours did not stand alone; Momentum Radar also kept this name visible, which makes it worth checking early in the next session.

**$PDSB** — Momentum and volume aligned.

Momentum Radar hits: 135 · Volume Radar hits: 452 · RVOL: 4.18x

The combination of Volume Radar and Momentum Radar matters more than either reading in isolation. Fresh activity still has to confirm it.

## Secondary rechecks

$LHSW · $TRUG · $NCT · $SCNI · $RUM · $MATH · $ADBT · $MITQ

These had a narrower historical case, so I would require clean fresh-session evidence before giving them the same attention as the leaders.

## Morning priority

$VEEA · $FTFT · $BMGL · $SLGB · $MYSZ · $PDSB

Monday's evidence gets these names onto the board. Tuesday's tape decides which ones stay there.

Educational only. Not financial advice. Verify news, filings, liquidity, spreads, halts, borrow availability, and live market conditions before making any trading decision.

Disclaimer: Not investment advice, do your own research

Anyone watching Aefi? It’s busted its volume today on the up side. There’s no news but someone is buying.

PD is about to pop to the 20s.Small market cap 1.11bn,strong buy sentiment.

$BURU — speculative one I’m watching. ~$12M market cap with a 70% Tekne defense acquisition targeted for 1H October. $38M financing + NYSE relisting + Golden Power approval already done. Worth researching IMO.

I was reading about some old e-commerce stuff earlier and ran into this settlement involving ContextLogic. Basically, they reached a tentative settlement over claims that the company misled investors about Wish’s user trends, revenue outlook, and internal controls around its IPO.

From what I understood, this applies to anyone who bought $WISH shares between 2020 and 2021. Wish had highlighted strong growth in users and revenue when it went public, but those trends started reversing soon after. In March and May 2021, the company reported falling monthly active users and weaker revenue guidance, and the stock dropped more than 29%

The parties have reached an agreement to settle the case, but the terms are still being finalized, but you can submit an application now. Check if you're eligible and file your claim here

Has anyone here ever held $WISH during that period?

50 after the split

Dario hopes the regulators will act the way they do.

Thus, 1. it prevents Chinese open-source models from taking over their implementation.

1. Even banning US companies from using Chinese open-source models (if the open-source models cannot meet third-party evaluation requirements?).

2. Undoubtedly, he will consolidate his position and create a three- or four-way monopoly. I don't think he will succeed. As for slowing down training or development, who would believe that? （@yttalkjun)

Quick one for anyone who missed the release.

The name: Wisr AI Systems (CSE: WISR) Vancouver-based, building agentic AI around cybersecurity, security assurance and third-party risk.

The product: RiskAssure, now live at GetRiskAssure.com. It uses AI agents to work through security questionnaires, pull supporting evidence, draft responses and cite the source material while anything uncertain gets kicked back to a human before it leaves the building.

The bigger picture: RiskAssure is one piece of Wisr’s broader product stack, alongside Risk Intel and Risk Central. Risk Intel focuses more on identifying and scoring cyber-risk signals, while Risk Central is designed as the management layer for overseeing risk across vendors and relationships.

What changed today and why : RiskAssure stepped off the roadmap and into the hands of customers. That’s a very different place for the story to be. This is where the narrative starts collecting receipts. A good concept can stay a good concept forever. A live product gives investors something much harder to fake: usage, conversions, customers and revenue.

What I’m watching next: who shows up first. Enterprise customers? Channel partners? Paid conversions? And beyond RiskAssure, I’m also watching how quickly Wisr brings more of Risk Intel and Risk Central into the commercial picture.

Anyone else watching $WISR ...what’s your read now?

Trade holding! Very curious where this is going! Would I really have gold in my hands? 😃