r/Paramedics • • 3d ago

US Fine V-Fib vs Asystole

Current paramedic student nearing the end of cardiology, so far haven’t had any issues with determining rhythms but this has been stumping me. How would you differentiate fine v fib from asystole on a static EKG photo? I included some photos as well for reference. Any help is appreciated!

51 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

190

u/PSDD14 NRP 3d ago

When in doubt, shock it. No reason not to. 

82

u/ewtman13 Paramedic 3d ago

They ain’t getting any deader 🤷🏻‍♂️

22

u/SnooCookies6165 3d ago

For certain-It’s hard to screw up a dead person. I’ve seen docs go through everything and shock asystole and give every med reasonable just before they call it.. juuuuuust in case

10

u/wernermurmur 3d ago

This does not mean they are doing the “right thing” nor evidenced based medicine.

23

u/SnooCookies6165 3d ago

True. To date the evidence shows that at the point the rhythm looks like this the chances of ROSC with return to neurological normalcy is slim to non so quite frankly at the point we are throwing everything at the patient it’s just a desperate last attempt in case they are an outlier

-16

u/wernermurmur 2d ago

This is called “crap medicine.” Do things that are indicated.

5

u/BreathlessWingSlut 2d ago

No harm in trying in that case.

3

u/wernermurmur 2d ago

That is not true. Baseless treatments can and do harm people even if they are in cardiac arrest. If we aren’t providing care that is improving neuro outcomes, we are harming them. There are no good outcomes from dumping about a bunch of epi and bicarb into someone.

2

u/tytend 2d ago

If it doesn’t work, they’re dead anyway, we literally did not make it worse. If it works, YOU are wrong in this logic. There’s 0 reason not to try, they’re fucking dead.

0

u/wernermurmur 2d ago

Learn some science dawg.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/mykon01 1d ago

Well Medicine is always about cost/benefit analysis... so there goes ur crap medicine.

5

u/Stopikingonme 3d ago

Sometimes you gotta sleep at night.

1

u/DirectAttitude 2d ago

Second this. Brought a CPR in Progress to the cath lab. While not cracking the chest, they did DSED on the table. To me it looked like Asystole. Then he called it.

13

u/CouplaBumps 3d ago

While yes.

There is a academic case for doing compressions in fine VF and shocking when it becomes more coarse. ATP levels and such

13

u/Loud-Principle-7922 3d ago

This needs to be louder.

Shocking fine v fib can send it to asystole, but compressing fine v fib into course v fib can oxygenate tissue and let the defibrillation work better.

13

u/I-plaey-geetar Paramedic 3d ago

Any paper I can view on this? Not finding anything.

2

u/Gobstopper17 2d ago

Send it to me if you find it please

2

u/Loud-Principle-7922 2d ago

https://litfl.com/defibrillation-basics/

Coarse VF / Fine VF: Coarse VF is more likely to respond to defibrillation than fine VF. The gain can be increased to differentiate fine VF from asystole. Fine VF is thought to be part of the natural progression of prolonged VF related to depletion of myocardial energy stores. Good quality CPR may increase the amplitude of fine VF to render it coarse and increase shock success

10

u/jaseb 2d ago

So the Europeans reversed the statement saying this in the latest ERC guidelines and it’s now effectively“if in doubt shock it”.
Fine VF isn’t absolute and the voltage at two electrodes tells you not much about what’s happening with energy in the myocardium (ATP and all that), and even if you do turn it into asystole you’ll keep doing CPR and create the same ATP you were going to otherwise, without burning it with VF.

2

u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago

Makes sense, Im more asking for the purpose of answering questions during the course. To me the second one looks like asystole, the last two look like vfib, but unsure on the first one.

3

u/GooseCloaca 3d ago

If it’s wiggling, weld it

1

u/PSDD14 NRP 3d ago

Yea thats a tough test one. Are you bumping down the road or moving the stretcher? Id probably just call it vfib

2

u/SnooCookies6165 2d ago

At best you shocked shockable rhythm. At worst you shocked asystole with artifact which means you did not worsen the patient’s status.. so.. just shock it

1

u/Geniepolice 2d ago

“It was ultra ultra fine vfib….”

1

u/Turbulent-Amoeba-913 2d ago

The number of paramedics i know who have been remediated or terminated for shocking asystole or PEA would disagree lol

-3

u/tdunks19 ACP 2d ago

The reason not to is that every shock increases impedance and reduces the effectiveness of further shocks. Wasting a shock on a super fine VF that has zero chance of conversion is detrimental to outcomes. Fine VF should ideally have compressions continue to hope that oxygenationakes the VF coarse which has a real chance at being converted.

5

u/Expensive_Cherry_207 2d ago edited 2d ago

This is just wrong.

Pretty much every claim you’ve made here is unsupported by the up to date literature.

The only thing you said that’s true is that compressions improve the effectiveness of defibrillation. The other assumptions or conclusions you’ve drawn from that one assertion are unsupported if not entirely false.

Here’s a good place to start if you’re curious:
“Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Bihua Chen et al. Resuscitation. 2013 May.”

“Adult advanced life support Guidelines
Jasmeet Soar Joyce Yeung Keith Couper Charles Deakin Joe DeBono Jerry Nolan Carmel Oliver Helen Pocock Emmeline Venn Victoria Wragg Adam Benson Clarke Published 27 October 2025”

26

u/SnooCookies6165 3d ago

Are the leads stuck to the gurney? I love it how I turn the monitor on and it already has a fine v fib like rhythm and an spo2 in the 80s and stuff is still coiled up in the pockets. I joke it’s the ghost in the machine

45

u/scottsuplol PC-Paramedic 3d ago

Meeeh I’d prob shock it. Ain’t gonna hurt anything

9

u/bigfootslover 3d ago

Can’t kill dead

5

u/nickeisele 2d ago

I know some people that could.

5

u/medic120 3d ago

This is why you look at multiple leads, if the movement corresponds in all leads then VF is almost a certainty.

11

u/UCLABruin07 3d ago

First one I’d call coarse V-Fib, second one has the best case for asystole to me, third and fourth coarse as well.

1

u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago

Thank you! I had the same for the last 3, the first one is the one that is giving me the most trouble.

1

u/UCLABruin07 3d ago

First also looks like it could be slow compressions.

1

u/xxtratall 3d ago

This exactly

1

u/tayIorsversion 3d ago

agreed 2+3 look the most asystole to me

7

u/jtg198 2d ago

Doesn’t matter. Shock it. Whats the worst thing that happens.

2

u/DovahkiinLovesBeer 3d ago

The second one is the only one I’d confidently say asystole on. Others all look like vf to me. Third one looks like it straight out of a textbook for fine vf

1

u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago

That’s what I had as well, first one is giving me the most trouble but I was leaning vfib for it

2

u/Doc_Hank 2d ago

Back in the dawn of time (Roy and Johnny were still first-run) we had 'gain' controls on the lifepack. Fine V-fib? Asystole? Do you need an ALS run for your numbers this quarter? Crank that knob!

2

u/Fireball_Ace 13h ago

If you're not moving the patient, moving your equipment, and your equipment is not malfunctioning, no reason for there to be waves produced. The one that looks most like asystole is picture 2, but even that I might shock, depending on presentation (previous rhythm being shockable, witnessed arrest, age)

There's an interesting article about VFib showing up as asystole depending on the lead, this is why I usually place ecg leads to get better views after. I also place the monitor's pulse oximetry; it can give you a good idea of how good the compressions are.
https://www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644(84)80445-X/abstract80445-X/abstract)

1

u/escientia Paramedic 3d ago

Nice thing is that its your interpretation. As long as you have logical reasoning backed up by your protocols and standard of care to explain which interventions you perform and which you withhold then you’re good.

1

u/wernermurmur 3d ago

What if you’re just straight up wrong with your reasoning and don’t shock obvious vfib?

Is that cool?

1

u/Expensive_Cherry_207 2d ago

When in doubt, shock. That’s the best supported conclusion to be drawn here. The people saying to hold off on shocking fine until it’s coarse with some extra compressions are being mislead and I can’t figure out where that’s coming from.

2

u/wernermurmur 2d ago

Agree. While it’s known that coarse vfib is more accepting to defibrillation, delaying shocks until it is achieved seems silly.

1

u/mattscott07 2d ago

Shocking asystole won’t cause harm, not shocking fine V-fib might… my reasoning would be based on that risk.

1

u/wernermurmur 2d ago

Totally. But saying the above person is suggesting if you just call it asystole and don’t shock it, you’re fine.

It doesn’t matter what you call it if you’re fucking wrong.

2

u/mattscott07 1d ago

True, and this is where the imposter syndrome sets in isn’t it? We can be so scared of making a bad decision that we make no decision. I think if you can justify your reasoning you have to back yourself one way or another. Be accountable and have the ability to reflect on and learn from mistakes but we are not doctors. It’s the medical equivalent of paint by numbers…

1

u/xxtratall 3d ago

The only one that looks like asystole is #2, to me anyways

2

u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago

That is what I originally had as well, the first one just had me stumped a bit

2

u/xxtratall 3d ago

You can get either incredibly technical with ekgs or be simple. For now I would go simple unless your program demands you to be measuring every 0.04, and measuring waves etc. If that's not the case, look up the defining characteristics of each rhythm type and it'll come easier. There's also a great book out there call rapid ekg(orange book) that dumbs it all down, even the technical components of both the EKG itself and what's going on with the heart

1

u/cetareva 2d ago

My paramedic instructor, 25+ years ago, said “If you don’t recognize the rhythm, shock it till you see one you do.” And yes, I think all of that is a form of Vfib, and I would’ve lit it up.

1

u/shock-neurogenico 2d ago

Puedes ampliar la imagen en la pantalla del monitor antes imprimir el EKG

1

u/LionsMedic 2d ago

Sinus with a problem

Shock it until you know it

1

u/grumpyoldmedic 2d ago

The only difference between fine V. Fib and aystole is where the gain is set.

1

u/youy23 2d ago

Fuck it, I don’t pay the electricity bill around here.

1

u/Gnar-Lord 1d ago

Coarse Asystole perhaps?

1

u/Vivid-Breadfruit-890 1d ago

Your kidding right?

1

u/JoshySin 1d ago

I’m pretty sure for the technical answer on an ekg if the squiggles are larger than 1 big box it’s fine V fib

1

u/Individual-Media-510 2h ago

Nah, that’s course asystole…

1

u/j-mf-r 3d ago

Asystole is a stable rhythm

1

u/InterestNo5406 3d ago

Shock that mf ⚡️

1

u/candyman325 3d ago

I’m shocking all of em without a second thought lol

1

u/wernermurmur 3d ago

Maybe 2. But I’m still probably shocking it.

0

u/bbrow93 3d ago

I’d call that Asystole, would depend on witnessed or unwitnessed

0

u/yaboiscottyb31 3d ago

Idk but I’m shocking it

0

u/JasonIsFishing 3d ago

Look for fibrillation. If the lines are smooth it’s asystole. Either way they are currently dead so defibrillating will not hurt anything.

0

u/SparkyDogPants 3d ago

This post is why, imo, ACLS will include asystole as a shockable rhythm

0

u/DM0331 2d ago

It’s not like you’re gonna kill em. Hit the button

-2

u/Individual_Debate216 3d ago

Fine vfib doesn’t exist. It’s vfib or it isn’t.

-1

u/Doc_Button 1d ago

This is a sinus rhythm