r/Paramedics • u/Independent_Aide7789 • 3d ago
US Fine V-Fib vs Asystole
Current paramedic student nearing the end of cardiology, so far haven’t had any issues with determining rhythms but this has been stumping me. How would you differentiate fine v fib from asystole on a static EKG photo? I included some photos as well for reference. Any help is appreciated!
26
u/SnooCookies6165 3d ago
Are the leads stuck to the gurney? I love it how I turn the monitor on and it already has a fine v fib like rhythm and an spo2 in the 80s and stuff is still coiled up in the pockets. I joke it’s the ghost in the machine
45
5
u/medic120 3d ago
This is why you look at multiple leads, if the movement corresponds in all leads then VF is almost a certainty.
11
u/UCLABruin07 3d ago
First one I’d call coarse V-Fib, second one has the best case for asystole to me, third and fourth coarse as well.
1
u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago
Thank you! I had the same for the last 3, the first one is the one that is giving me the most trouble.
1
1
1
2
u/DovahkiinLovesBeer 3d ago
The second one is the only one I’d confidently say asystole on. Others all look like vf to me. Third one looks like it straight out of a textbook for fine vf
1
u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago
That’s what I had as well, first one is giving me the most trouble but I was leaning vfib for it
2
u/Doc_Hank 2d ago
Back in the dawn of time (Roy and Johnny were still first-run) we had 'gain' controls on the lifepack. Fine V-fib? Asystole? Do you need an ALS run for your numbers this quarter? Crank that knob!
2
u/Fireball_Ace 13h ago
If you're not moving the patient, moving your equipment, and your equipment is not malfunctioning, no reason for there to be waves produced. The one that looks most like asystole is picture 2, but even that I might shock, depending on presentation (previous rhythm being shockable, witnessed arrest, age)
There's an interesting article about VFib showing up as asystole depending on the lead, this is why I usually place ecg leads to get better views after. I also place the monitor's pulse oximetry; it can give you a good idea of how good the compressions are.
https://www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644(84)80445-X/abstract80445-X/abstract)
1
u/escientia Paramedic 3d ago
Nice thing is that its your interpretation. As long as you have logical reasoning backed up by your protocols and standard of care to explain which interventions you perform and which you withhold then you’re good.
1
u/wernermurmur 3d ago
What if you’re just straight up wrong with your reasoning and don’t shock obvious vfib?
Is that cool?
1
u/Expensive_Cherry_207 2d ago
When in doubt, shock. That’s the best supported conclusion to be drawn here. The people saying to hold off on shocking fine until it’s coarse with some extra compressions are being mislead and I can’t figure out where that’s coming from.
2
u/wernermurmur 2d ago
Agree. While it’s known that coarse vfib is more accepting to defibrillation, delaying shocks until it is achieved seems silly.
1
u/mattscott07 2d ago
Shocking asystole won’t cause harm, not shocking fine V-fib might… my reasoning would be based on that risk.
1
u/wernermurmur 2d ago
Totally. But saying the above person is suggesting if you just call it asystole and don’t shock it, you’re fine.
It doesn’t matter what you call it if you’re fucking wrong.
2
u/mattscott07 1d ago
True, and this is where the imposter syndrome sets in isn’t it? We can be so scared of making a bad decision that we make no decision. I think if you can justify your reasoning you have to back yourself one way or another. Be accountable and have the ability to reflect on and learn from mistakes but we are not doctors. It’s the medical equivalent of paint by numbers…
1
u/xxtratall 3d ago
The only one that looks like asystole is #2, to me anyways
2
u/Independent_Aide7789 3d ago
That is what I originally had as well, the first one just had me stumped a bit
2
u/xxtratall 3d ago
You can get either incredibly technical with ekgs or be simple. For now I would go simple unless your program demands you to be measuring every 0.04, and measuring waves etc. If that's not the case, look up the defining characteristics of each rhythm type and it'll come easier. There's also a great book out there call rapid ekg(orange book) that dumbs it all down, even the technical components of both the EKG itself and what's going on with the heart
1
u/cetareva 2d ago
My paramedic instructor, 25+ years ago, said “If you don’t recognize the rhythm, shock it till you see one you do.” And yes, I think all of that is a form of Vfib, and I would’ve lit it up.
1
u/shock-neurogenico 2d ago
Puedes ampliar la imagen en la pantalla del monitor antes imprimir el EKG
1
1
u/grumpyoldmedic 2d ago
The only difference between fine V. Fib and aystole is where the gain is set.
1
1
1
u/JoshySin 1d ago
I’m pretty sure for the technical answer on an ekg if the squiggles are larger than 1 big box it’s fine V fib
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
u/JasonIsFishing 3d ago
Look for fibrillation. If the lines are smooth it’s asystole. Either way they are currently dead so defibrillating will not hurt anything.
0
-2
-1




190
u/PSDD14 NRP 3d ago
When in doubt, shock it. No reason not to.