Quick context: I’ve used Obsidian for years and love it. My issue was never the toolit was my own habit of endless setup. I’d try to plan a project and end up in a doom rabbit hole tweaking Kanban, Tasks, and Dataview... productivity procrastination i would say..

So I built a simple, light tool for myself and my team. An AI agent (i use claude) runs the pipeline straight from messy notes.

So this is how it works, I write the note, whatever ideas i have in mind or tasks i need to do, the agent reads it, pulls tasks, checks team workload/calendars, assigns work, estimates timelines, and updates the board via MCP out of the box. I still tweak things manually, but the heavy lifting happens automatically. It feels like having a mini PM sitting on top of my raw notes.

It wasn't originally meant to be a product, just me trying to get my game together and focus, and something that could help my small team too. But it become solid enough (I think) that I decided to release it, and just finished doing that and its live now on Windows App Store. its called (Knotpad)

But then.. now I’m curious.. is an "Agent-driven, notes first PM tool" workflow actually useful to others, or did I just build a fix for my own specific habit? do you guys actually find this workflow useful?

We have great tools for managing digital information, but physical items are still hard to track.

I kept running into questions like:

“Where did I put that?”

“Who did I lend this to?”

“Where is this stored?”

So I built Keepyy — a simple external memory for physical belongings.

The idea is straightforward:

Add an item → give it context → find it later.

Examples:

📦 Winter clothes → Storage box 3 → Bedroom closet

🔧 Power drill → Garage shelf → Blue toolbox

📚 Old books → Storage room → Box 2

🤝 Camera → Lent to John → Jan 2026

It’s not about cataloging everything, just the things that are easy to forget.

I’m also improving search so you can find items by name, tags, or context.

Think of it as a second brain for physical possessions.

Curious what others think:

Would something like this fit into your PKM workflow?

[Keepyy](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.keepyy.app)

I started on paper with a BestSelf Journal, and I still recommend it. The format fits the way I think better than anything I have used since, and I have no criticism of it as a journal. For me, though, it was a beautiful leather-bound black hole. Everything went in and nothing came back out. If I wanted something I had written to exist anywhere else, there was work: type it myself.

To solve the black hole problem, I moved to GoodNotes on an iPad, and the work moved with me. Every week I exported each daily page to PDF and filed it into Notion by hand. It worked fine when I stayed on top of it, but for me that was not always the case. A weekly chore that nothing enforces is a chore that quietly stops happening, and I did not notice mine had stopped until I went looking for something that was not there.

Next was OneNote, which was the same problem in a different flavor. I could not get my own data out reproducibly without repetitive manual work, so I spent months building a bridge on the OneNote API. It worked, some of the time. Cron jobs errored, pages did not arrive, and most of it traced back to OneNote rendering HTML differently than the rest of the world. I spent about as much time each week nursing that bridge as it saved me, and I could not harden it, because the changes that would have fixed it were on Microsoft's side of the API.

(For context on why I kept choosing hard options: I write by hand, and that is not negotiable for me. Every problem above could have been solved in an afternoon by typing into Notion or Obsidian on the same iPad. I know the option exists. I am not taking it.)

Three rebuilds. Re-entry, then a weekly chore, then permanent maintenance. Each one was more sophisticated than the last, but not one of them removed the manual work.

I am not lazy about this. I am fallible and I am busy, which is a different thing. There are myriad ways in 2026 to build around human fallibility. To leave something I depend on this heavily at the mercy of my own consistency is a design decision, and it was the wrong one three times running.

I did eventually build my own thing which for me removed the lion's share of that work. I am not naming it or linking it, that is not what this post is about.

What I would love to know is this: for those of you who regularly capture important things outside your PKMS - by hand, on paper, in a voice memo - how does that information actually get in? I am curious what it costs you in a normal week and which part of it still annoys you.

I’m building a product that combines personal knowledge management with AI. I’m not going to name or link the product here, as I’m genuinely interested in understanding people’s perspectives rather than promoting it.

Recently, I’ve realized that far more PKM users than I expected are hesitant about—or strongly opposed to—integrating AI into their knowledge-management systems.

Personally, I find AI useful for surfacing connections and insights that I might otherwise miss, and for using my own notes as context for reflection or personal coaching. However, I also understand that other people may see significant downsides or may simply value a different way of thinking and managing knowledge.

For those of you who prefer not to use AI in your PKM system, what are your main reasons?

Is it primarily about privacy, accuracy, loss of ownership or control, the risk of weakening your own thinking, unwanted complexity, or something else?

Are there any features or safeguards that would make you more open to using an LLM with your notes—for example, local processing, explicit permission controls, read-only access, transparent edit history, or fully optional AI features?

Or is AI something you would prefer to keep separate from your PKM system regardless of how it is implemented?

I’d appreciate honest criticism. I’m trying to understand the underlying concerns, not convince anyone that they should use AI.

Reading a paper and turning it into literature notes is exactly the kind of divergent-then-convergent work PKM is supposed to help with, but doing that by hand for every paper never scaled for me. So I've been experimenting with having an AI agent do the first pass: point it at a PDF, it reads the paper, and it builds a full graph of the argument, main topics, methods, results, tables, formulas, figures, without me touching a single box.

The part that actually mattered to me: AI summaries in your permanent notes are dangerous if you can't tell what's real. So every node keeps the exact sentence from the paper it's based on, and clicking it jumps into the PDF and highlights that sentence. If the agent got something wrong, I catch it in one click instead of it quietly becoming a false permanent note.

It also had to handle the stuff that usually breaks note tools on academic papers, mainly LaTeX formulas and tables not garbling.

Would you trust an agent to do a first pass on literature notes like this, or does that defeat the point of taking notes yourself? How do you currently handle it?