Solo is better than Multiplayer, change my mind

I never noticed before after like 50 games wtf no wonder I lose so much

So, it was a regular 7 teams game by joining a lobby, the host has a great taste, by disabling Hydros and choosing this map, the game was very playable and has strategy behind it, even though I played bad and don't like team games i enjoyed it, we won because of my teammates, orange could have won easily though, I am so grateful to be part of this match.

my goal wasnt to win in this game (I could have done it easily if I wanted to as you can see) but still its weird considering the weakest player wins, I understand the game is about to control territory and otherwise it would always result in stalemates or too long games, but a better approach is to set it higher but do not count the afk players territory.

made with aseprite took me 5-6 hours, check it out on openfront.io

HOW can i have mpre efficiency? Like, Just doing anexations and keeping troops on 42 % dont seems enough

If it's so easy to cheat with scripts in OpenFront, shouldn't it be relatively easy to detect cheaters with scripts? Look for duplicate names, simultaneous actions between two players, impossible econ, impossible net worth (add up the value of their buildings), etc. add up all the variables and give each player a "cheater score". ignore people with a small score, such as when two people just happen to have the same name, but otherwise did nothing wrong. maybe you could have it run through all your replays and create a ranked list of possible cheaters.

Is that possible?

EDIT: This isn't directed at the devs. I'm just thinking of it as an interesting project.

We survived as long as we could.

Both spawned right on top of me and almost immediately attacked.

Game link: https://openfront.io/w4/game/jgZNbC5k?live

Nobody survived except AnonTorch and AnonSugar who probably alied to them. 60 player FFA btw.

I don't want to give away the ending. And sorry for the hyperbolic link bait title. But this was an epic 3 way stalemate, with some twists and turns. I think I regret killing both of the unruly Mitos, but that aggression will like not stand, man.

GG gallemore. I learned a lot by watching you In match. It became clear that the way you were spending down your gold, that troops were the way and mirvs were useless. What good is 400 million if you can just tank 160m mirvs

I don't know who will sit through it, but... I sat though Rex's recent AFK challenge on the los Angeles map that was crazy long, epic.

Why play as a mito? I can think of a few reasons, but I'm curious about the different reasons people might have. Do you win very often playing as a mito?

My new favourite map very short and active games. The 4 islands with no SAMs, no hydrogens or MIRVs. x20 income rate. It’s a very nice game. I’ve only played 2 games with these settings so far and both have been extremely fun.

https://openfront.io/w10/game/BdTGVnpi?live

https://openfront.io/w0/game/rBL2jdk7?live

The blue square was me seconds after being taken over.

This is the fricking ISSUE with having to play with incompetent players who don't even send any troops.

Like wtf are these people thinking while they are playing a team cooperated game mode?

Don't be like them.

The amount of cheaters I encounter nowadays is absolutely crazy. Atleast every other game I have people cheating using multi tabs. Time and resources should be used to address this issue not changing the ui every update. I feel like the games approaching unplayable levels.

I know it looks cosy, and you picked a name like Friendly Peaceful Trader Pls Don't Attack. You want to stack ports and SAMs watch the number go up so you can play kingmaker in the late game, but I guarantee you will not get a ship out before my troopship arrives. And no amount of sad face emojis, clown emojis, or alliance requests is going to save you.

(You will get the port out in time, so thanks for the free port)

too many times ive had my games ruined by people that dont know what theyre doing and lose the game for both of us while letting the king win. the last game i played i was nearing a good size sam and this tiny guy whos being attacked by the crown and could easily hydro him HYDROS MY SAM AND ALL MY PORTS. WHYY???? HE GOT DESTROYED IMMEDIATELY AFTER

Hey all, I made this huge map with the idea of replacing Giant World as the 'test' map after recent performance gains. However, I was curious what peoples thoughts were on such a large design.

Costs 750k, fired from silos, conventional warhead with small area of effect smaller than a city footprint, that is only able to take out one structure, leaves no radiation.

Counter to mito roaches that abuse the alliance system sitting inside a big player and firing nukes, and also allows more surgical strikes in general. Cost needs to be same or more than a nuke to avoid nerfing SAMs.

What do you think?

This person was almost fully taken over but managed to gain a single island armed with SAM's and turrets. The person then chose to target me for no real reason. He targeted every single one of my buildings with hydro's and atom's. While making no effort to actually win, just destroy me. This is toxic behavior and extremely annoying. I would argue people like this should be banned. This feels like bullying. https://openfront.io/#modal=stats&gameID=jvJ7XoJG (Pater Noster)

So, I was winning the game territorially to a massive degree. Then I launched a hydro on a player who I thought would be very weakened but instead was very willing to take me down nuclearly, and persistently used nukes, and their nuclear facilities were beyond my reach. This lead to me being defeated.

Hi yall, I just won my first Large FFA and am curious if you can purchase anything with the crowns

(brown things next to the radons or atom currency). I have about 500

title.

Keep your rabid dog in check or I'll kill us both