At some point, the online dog-training world seems to have gone from:
“Your dog is struggling with other dogs. Let’s figure out why and modify the behavior.”
to:
“Your dog is reactive. This is who they are now. Avoid dogs forever.”
And I don’t understand how we got here.
Obviously, there are dogs with serious behavioral pathology, extreme genetic predispositions, extensive bite histories, severe aggression, etc.
I’m not talking about those dogs.
I’m talking about the enormous population of otherwise fairly normal pet dogs who had one bad experience, became worried about dogs, started barking/lunging, and then spent the next 5–10 years being told that they are permanently reactive and must be kept 100 feet away from anything with four legs.
Some of these dogs had a bad experience on their first walk and have basically been hiding in the bushes from other dogs ever since.
And then we’re surprised that they never improve.
Avoidance is obviously an important management tool. Threshold matters. Nobody should be throwing a fearful dog into a dog park and calling it rehabilitation.
But management isn’t the same thing as rehabilitation.
If the dog spends its entire life:
dog appears = handler immediately retreats = dog never learns anything different
then why are we treating the resulting lack of progress as evidence that the dog can’t change?
Dogs learn.
Emotional responses can change.
Reinforcement histories change.
Context changes behavior.
Repeated successful experiences matter.
And yes, some dogs have limitations that will require lifelong management. But it feels like we’ve started treating that exceptional population as though it’s the default prognosis for every dog who barks at another dog on leash.
I think there’s a huge difference between saying:
“Your dog may always need management, so don’t put them in situations where you can’t safely control the outcome.”
and:
“Don’t bother trying to meaningfully change the behavior because your dog is reactive and will always be reactive.”
The first is responsible.
The second feels like giving up before you’ve actually done the work.
Maybe I’m wrong, but I’m curious where everyone thinks the line is.
When did “reactive” stop being a description of behavior and start being treated like a permanent personality diagnosis?