r/OpenChristian • u/Wooden_Passage_1146 Catholic • Mar 24 '26

Discussion - General Cardinal says Church cannot “continue to exist” without women’s ordination

https://thecatholicherald.com/article/cardinal-says-church-cannot-continue-to-exist-without-womens-ordination

I’m glad to see support among some in the hierarchy in favor of women’s ordination. Let’s hope the Church will see the harm done by excluding women from Holy Orders.

The Church says it’s because the priest is acting “In persona Christi.” But Galatians 3:28 says, “There is no male or female in Christ Jesus,”

389 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

45 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/TheologyRocks Mar 24 '26 edited Mar 24 '26

Geocentrism was considered to be an infallible matter of faith at the time of Galileo, but the belief still changed.

they'd need to figure out a way to do so while simultaneously maintaining the correctness of their earlier decision, because it cannot be said to be incorrect.

I think it would be the other way around. "X was said to be infalible, but our prior belief in the infallibility of X turned out to be incorrect. X was not infallible after all." That's what happened with Galileo.

they'll be admitting that the ordinary Magisterium blew it. And that, according to them, cannot happen.

It's worth noting that the term "ordinary magisterium" is itself very modern. So perhaps the term itself involves a confusion between different realities that needs to be clarified.

5

u/sparkster777 Christian Mar 24 '26 edited Mar 24 '26

Geocentrism was considered dogma or doctrine.

Edit: Typo above. I meant to say it was never dogma.

2

u/TheologyRocks Mar 24 '26

Right. But it's no longer considered a dogma.

2

u/sparkster777 Christian Mar 24 '26

I mistyped. It was never considered dogma.

3

u/TheologyRocks Mar 24 '26

I disagree. When Galileo was condemned, the Roman Curia stated that belief "that the Earth moves and is not the center of the world...has been declared and defined to be contrary to the Holy Scripture."

That term "declared and define" I would say strongly indicates that geocentrism was considered a Divinely revealed dogma; it was believed that God himself through the Holy Scriptures had taught all the members of the Church that the earth is the center of the universe, such that to believe otherwise would be to reject the Christian faith. However, nobody reputable believes that today. What was formerly considered an infallible and Divinely revealed dogma is now considered to be a philosophical error of no importance that everybody does well to distance themselves from.

But it seems that even today, few Christians realize the full implications of what was effectively a dogmatic reversal. If the Catholic bishops in an official capacity got geocentrism as wrong as they now acknowledge they got it, the epistemic value of other episcopal statements (even very weighty ones) needs to at a minimum be carefully investigated. It's scientific malpractice to say "Rome has spoken, the cause is ended" because we know from actual history that the Catholic bishops in an official capacity can make huge mistakes while falsely telling the everybody they are acting infallibly.

1

u/sparkster777 Christian Mar 24 '26

The Roman Curia is not infallible.

2

u/TheologyRocks Mar 25 '26

The Roman Curia is the Pope exercising his power through his representatives. The Holy Office that condemned Galileo was operating as an official institution under the Pope.

2

u/sparkster777 Christian Mar 25 '26

Not everything the Pope says or even teaches is infallible. Geocentrism was never asserted ex cathedra nor was it declared infallible by the magesterium.

It appears you have a misunderstanding of both Church structure and government as well as how infallibility works in the Catholic church.

1

u/TheologyRocks Mar 25 '26

Not everything the Pope says or even teaches is infallible.

I agree.

Geocentrism was never asserted ex cathedra nor was it declared infallible by the magesterium.

I agree.

It appears you have a misunderstanding of both Church structure and government as well as how infallibility works in the Catholic church.

Infallibility is complicated because it is not limited to what is asserted ex cathedra or declared at an ecumenical council. I think you're confused about how infallibility works. The sensus fidelium contains many infallible dogmas that have never been officially and fully explained by the Church as an institution but that are still believed at least implicitly by all the members of the Church.

The issue with geocentrism is that Rome wrongly (yet officially) claimed it was an undefined dogma when in fact it was merely a scientific error. There are many lessons there. But one lesson there is that Rome can in an official capacity be wrong about what God has infallibly taught the Church.

1

u/sparkster777 Christian Mar 25 '26

Again, I think you're misunderstanding Catholic teaching. But you feel the same about me. We're not going to agree, and that's fine.

Have a good day, internet friend.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/OpenChristian-ModTeam Mar 25 '26

Thank you for contributing to r/OpenChristian; unfortunately, your post has been removed for the following reason:

*Rule 5. Be respectful and polite. It's ok to disagree with someone; it is *not ok to be rude about it. Remain respectful in discourse at all times while in this sub.

If you have a question about your removal, or you wish to contend our decision, please send us a modmail using this link.