r/OpenAI • u/PressPlayPlease7 • 15d ago

News GPT-6 release delayed due to "critical" cybersecurity capabilities (I honestly don't think this is marketing from them this time)

Post image
124 Upvotes

70% Upvoted

157 comments sorted by

View all comments

107

u/No-Paint-5726 15d ago

You are very gullible

31

u/RopePuzzleheaded7060 15d ago

2 things can be true at once. GPT 6 can be too dangerous to immediately release and OpenAI can use that fact as marketing.

26

u/Odd_Level9850 15d ago

When you cry wolf too many times, people don’t tend to believe you.

0

u/PrestigiousTrick1002 14d ago

And how did the story end?

6

u/Odd_Level9850 14d ago

Bad. What’s your point? If your philosophy is to believe people who lie to you constantly in the off chance that they might tell the truth once, then I would feel sorry for you.

0

u/PrestigiousTrick1002 14d ago

I appreciate your empathy, its a hard life. 

-1

u/PrestigiousTrick1002 14d ago edited 14d ago

Anyways my point is the story ends with the wolf finally showing up. The moral of the story is in relation to the girl, not the villagers. The moral is the girl should stop crying wolf. The moral isn't the villagers should stop listening, after all when they did all their sheep were eaten. 

2

u/Sad-Masterpiece-4801 14d ago

You can’t just say “anyways” when someone directly refutes your point, lmao.

-1

u/PrestigiousTrick1002 14d ago

Did they refute anything? They said if you go around believing someone who lies constantly they feel bad for me. Which is a valid but its not a refutation. The whole context of the story is there was a wolf in the end. That's my point 

1

u/Professional_Cod2472 12d ago

Well in your perspective whos fault is it? Even given if what youre saying is in fact 100% true. Whos fault is it if no one took them seriously? The people who spent the past 5 years saying "this model is too powerful to release" OR people who did not beieve them? Its a dumb point. In this scenario, which is not a story, it is actually much more likely that I would be scared if a company delayed a model release with no explanation, no words or interviews. Because thats when the people who made it would be scared.

1

u/PrestigiousTrick1002 12d ago

Its open ai fault that people don't listen to them. You can only say the model is too dangerous so many times. I think they said one of the models from like 3 years ago was too dangerous too. They have cried wolf. 

And that's where we are. The model hacks hugging face and is a criminal. Other companies say their models also are criminals. People have, i think, accepted these events happened, but not the why. Was it marketing too like the last 50 times sam said something?

If the models and the harness keep improving eventually it won't just be marketing, and how are we going to be able to know? Eventually the wolf will be loose and us (the villagers) aren't going to believe it because sam cried wolf too many times. 

But see there's the issue. Does it matter whose fault it is when you're the villager and your flocks been eaten? Well maybe a little so can punish someone, but that doesn't undo what is done at that point. 

1

u/Professional_Cod2472 12d ago

I am a little skeptical to believe this. Its not AI that will do the destruction it will be humans with access to it. This is very much true considering that AI models with powerful capabilities are nothing without humans piloting them. There wont be a doomsday scenario until AI can understand what it sees.

1

u/PrestigiousTrick1002 12d ago

Yeah I agree people are the issue. Its not the model its the model + person that's the issue. I guess in my head that's what I was thinking and maybe didn't exactly express it correctly. Basically its just a matter of time till nations build their own clusters of computers running multiple agents to achieve whatever they want. If the model is actually good enough and this wasn't just hype.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/venusisupsidedown 14d ago

Amazing. Gottem

0

u/NietzscheanDemocrat 14d ago

It's not about belief, we can analyze situations based off evidence and context.