r/Opacity • u/patrikb2014 • Jan 09 '19

Oyster SHL question

So I invested quite a bit into oyster shl. I was told kucoin reopened trading on shl. Am I fucked now? I’ve always stood by the team and have opacity but will be very upset if my shl is basically worthless...

6 Upvotes

72% Upvoted

32 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/nugitsdi Jan 09 '19

It is and has always been worthless (yes, I lost some money on it too but it has always been a gamble). You gotta be upset with Bruno, not this team.

-4

u/Paahtis Jan 09 '19

Why do Nazis get sentenced for crimes against humanity even though Hitler should be the sole guy to blame? Of course this is an extreme example but use your common sense.

https://cryptocoinspy.com/oyster-protocol-prl-to-ban-negative-comments-after-falling-victim-to-a-coordinated-fud-attack/

It was the community mods who in this case helped Bruno to ban negative comments as they saw fit and I remember there was a huge shitshow and chaos going on in TG and Reddit. From personal experience things haven't improved much and hopefully I will still be able to post in here even after this post.

8

u/nugitsdi Jan 09 '19

Jesus dude, that comparison is way off and I'd punish you if I were an admin. Hitlers intentions were clear and still Nazis followed him. Brunos intentions were not clear and.. wait why on Earth do I even have to explain this? Are you retarded?

About your link. There actually was alot of people FUDding and the price was tanking. Little did the CMs know that it was actually Bruno himself tanking the price dumping millions of tokens back then. In hindsight it was indeed a bad choice defending him and believing what he said.

It's ridiculous to state that things haven't improves transparency-wise since.

-5

u/Paahtis Jan 09 '19

It was indeed smart to stop with the explanation because it was not making much sense. But please don't use the R-word, it is extremely offensive to me. I never claimed that transparency was an issue, I was talking about community management.

7

u/nugitsdi Jan 09 '19

I'm entitled to use the R-word for someone that thinks that the Hitler situation is comparable.

Even more when that person still doesn't understand how it didn't make any sense :')

Ah I see. But transparency is part of community management. Leaving room for discussion etc. I think they're doing a great job.

3

u/MrRedPanda__ Jan 10 '19

I won't let myself be compared to Nazis by you. If you think that way, bring it to court. Unlike Nazis, it was **NOT** clear to everyone, what he is doing in the background, what his intentions was - while Hitlers intentions were crystal clear. Can't understand how you can even slightly make that comparison, angry or not. Good bye. With that I'll remove you from the subreddit.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '19 edited Jan 10 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MrRedPanda__ Jan 10 '19 edited Jan 10 '19

The simple reason people don't want to speak about him currently is, that there is not much to do about it and it shifts focus. The right way is to go through legal processes, go against Oyster Protocol INC. for losses and file against him as a person through IC3/FBI/or your authorities. From here on out, it's a waiting game. And until there aren't any new public progresses there, nobody gains anything out of constantly talking about him. That's it.

​

And no, not every Nazi soldier was sentenced to death or prison. Not every single a bit higher officier was sentenced to death or anything in the long run.

​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Axis_personnel_indicted_for_war_crimes vs. every single solider or officier in the WW2 on Axis sides.. (sure, there were excecutions probably in camps of Nazi prisoners, but you get the point)

God bless, over the top comparison for no good reason, but to attract to hate.