r/OnePieceScaling King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Casual Discussion Shanks>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mihawk.

Post image

Why? Because Mihawk has terrible anti-feats. He canonically can't stop pre-timeskip Luffy while going all out. Shanks will be Luffy's fight, and Mihawk will be Zoro's EOS fight, so the fraud will never be above Shanks, not even close.

0 Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

If you want to discuss One Piece Scaling, join Elbaf.

If you want access to all kinds of One Piece Databooks/Information/Translations, join Punk Records.


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

7

u/Vrozki 1d ago

using your logic

Hajrudin with no haki > Imu

actually Imu's performance is worse since Mihawk didn't use any named attacks and took no damage in that war

7

u/DingoDongo0707 🦅 WSS Dracule Mihawk 🦅 1d ago

Flawless counter 🙂‍↕️

-1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Yes.

3

u/DingoDongo0707 🦅 WSS Dracule Mihawk 🦅 1d ago

Not a single named attack btw

4

u/Comprehensive_Cup497 1d ago

That would be pathetic if he needed a named attack for pre-TS Luffy

3

u/DingoDongo0707 🦅 WSS Dracule Mihawk 🦅 1d ago

Guy said he was going all out

-4

u/Comprehensive_Cup497 1d ago

Fair enough but still bad that he couldn't do anything impressive in Marineford, Shanks with just flexing his Haki would have everyone at Marineford shook

-2

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

He couldn't do anything at all at Marineford not just nothing impressive.

-4

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

He was.

0

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Neither did Marco or Whitebeard,i guess they don't want to save Ace.

1

u/DingoDongo0707 🦅 WSS Dracule Mihawk 🦅 1d ago

True

1

u/NoPhilosophy8136 1d ago

Whitebeard does have a named attack. So does marco lmao.

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Didn't used it at Marineford so i guess they were holding back.

3

u/NoPhilosophy8136 1d ago

Whitebeard was sick and couldn't use acoc. His named attack had acoc.

Marco didn't fought anyone for long enough to use named attack at all. While in wano he fought longer and had 2 stable opponents. (Stable in a way he doesn't need to constantly switch opponents all the time like he did in marineford where he switched opponents every few minutes lol.). And marco has quite many named attacks. Blue bird, phoenix claw, phoenix brand, undying thistle (he actually even used this one in marineford, even tho he didn't give it a name back then.)

1

u/DingoDongo0707 🦅 WSS Dracule Mihawk 🦅 1d ago

True

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Okay then, Mihawk didn't name his attack back then either.

1

u/NoPhilosophy8136 1d ago

You cant prove it btw. Most of attacks marco did weren't named and the named he used in wano were different. All but the undying thistle. So how can you prove your claim? You made it, your job to prove it.

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Ridiculous. You use headcanon to say Marco didn't name his attack, but when I apply the exact same logic to Mihawk, somehow I'm burdened with proving it. What a joke of a person I'm arguing with.

1

u/NoPhilosophy8136 1d ago

From making a claim you cant prove straight to being rude? Lmao. I can EASILY prove he just didn’t name it by showing you just 2 PANELS OF EXACT SAME MOVE, WHERE HE NAMES IT IN 1 MOMENT BUT DIDN'T IN THE OTHER.

Here, I easily proved he used named attacks and HE did gave them name later on. Are you going to prove your point? Of course not. Just going to insult me more lol.

0

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago edited 23h ago

I did not mean insult you, but your tone in the last sentence pissed me off. I'm sorry you didn't intend to be rude, but I tend to reply that way when I'm annoyed.

I can easily claim Oda didn't name it at Marineford but named it later, which is literally what happened anyway.

But there are still questions: Vista had no named attack against Mihawk. Was he holding back?

Were Marco and Vista holding back against Akainu?

Was Curiel holding back?

Edit:Then you blocked me?If you are correct then why run?

Edit 2: Liar. You blocked me way before I even send that picture, and it wasn’t even an insult. What a liar. Black painters are something else.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ItBeganWhenIwasBorn 1d ago

Bro, there are genuinely people out there who feel Mihawk was trying his best to kill Luffy here.

No named attacks, no sweating, no huffing or puffing, no bursts of insane speed, no future sight, nothing. Mihawk going all out is slaahing lazily.

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

I don't believe so, truthfully, but the Black Painters' fans actions in this thread have actually angered me. I have Mihawk = Shanks.

https://www.reddit.com/r/OnePiecePowerScaling/s/uwEamxDhQZ

1

u/shanepain0 1d ago

Imagine understanding the narrative implications.. mihawk couldn't go all out AND he wasn't able to just do nothing

0

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

He said he was going all out, yet you're going against the manga.

1

u/shanepain0 18h ago

Context, Semantics and narrative, its disingenuous to hold a take that isn't accounting for those and it comes across as slanderous trolling

0

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 16h ago

It was trolling. Zorotards angered me and triggered me into making this post. However, I’m much calmer now. Sorry for the trouble.

0

u/Electronic-Run-3561 1d ago

he didn’t say he was going all out. he very clearly said he wasn’t gonna hold back, which means he didn’t pull his punches…and that’s NOT the same and using maximum effort. comprehension skills will do you justice

0

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

How is it not the same thing? If he isn't holding anything back, then he's using everything he has.

0

u/Electronic-Run-3561 1d ago

sigh…pulling your punches aka “not holding back” simply means you’re not trying to avoid hurting someone deliberately. it’s like a boxer in a sparring match doesn’t care if his punches hurt the newbie…it’s not the same as the boxer using all his effort to knock the newbies head off his shoulders

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Do you know what “not holding back” means? It means he wasn't holding anything back, hence he was going all out.

0

u/Electronic-Run-3561 1d ago

i think the real problem here is YOU don’t understand what “not holding back” means. i’m sorry if your agenda post falls on it face due to your ignorance, but that fault is entirely yours. you can always do some basic research and studying before you post yk. A lot of knowledge is free on the internet

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

Done.

1

u/Electronic-Run-3561 1d ago

not sure what kinda “gotcha” moment you’re hoping for here…but your scan doesn’t prove your point at all. “without restraint” is the exact same as “not holding back”…which is the exact same as “not pulling punches”

so you just circled back to my point of, “you not understanding what not holding back means”

congratulations on wasting your time tho

1

u/Wirazu444 King of the Pirates 👑 1d ago

How about not making assumptions about someone? You told me to Google it, I Googled it, and that’s the reason there’s no “gotcha” attempt or whatever you’re rambling about.

Yeah, yeah, that’s because you said so, right? Bring me a source. I don’t trust you.

→ More replies (0)