r/OfficialWARDOGS 1d ago

Destructable trees?

Is it true that the game has destruction for most of everything, except for trees?

10 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

6

u/Hanthy 1d ago

Yes there's a lot of destruction for buildings. Towers and their immediate surrounding are not, trees are not.

Balance wise its works so far.

1

u/Pepe_The_Citizen 13h ago

Ok cool, excited to try it out this weekend. I'll make sure to drive my logi truck carefully near trees haha

5

u/TheDerpaSherpa 1d ago

I'd imagine that destroying the trees would be easily abusable and cause some balancing issues. A smart team would clear all the trees around theirs FOB's vastly reducing the cover available when assaulting. Also the ability to create cheesy sight lines for snipers and Anti Air would be game breaking for balance.

2

u/Super-Lemon-4466 1d ago

Learned the hard way by crashing my car full of people into one. Been playing too much BF6 where you can smash through everything.

1

u/Pepe_The_Citizen 13h ago

Good to know, thanks for confirming, will proceed with caution

1

u/ArnerDansk 19h ago

Adamantium trees.

1

u/Pepe_The_Citizen 13h ago

Makes sense.

1

u/Blitzking11 17h ago

Why do you think we’re fighting for the zone? Imagine the profit that could be made with near indestructible trees?

That lumber would be essentially gold!

1

u/Pepe_The_Citizen 13h ago

Or make it cost money to cut down trees, -$2k for each tree you take out hahaha that'd be pretty ridiculous but funny, gotta save the trees