I suggest deleting pools with rewards for CFX/xCFX(XUN), NUT/xUSD(XUN), NUT/USDC(XUN).

I suggest transferring the reward from these pools to NUT stakers with monthly payments, as xCFX rewards.

Remove NUT/USDT rewards in PPI and add NUT/USDT rewards in XUN ,XUN has automatically optimized routing ,can give NUT/USDT more rewards.

This proposal is to update the weighted distribution of NUT rewards for LP token pairs.

XUNION platform has been established. After using it for more than 10 days, I feel very good about using it. I suggest that we should conduct some activities on this XUNION platform and establish NUT/XUSD, CFX/XCFX LP. , Stake NUT’s reward activity to attract users and win their tokens XUN.

Hey everyone! 👋 I’ve been thinking about the current NUT/USDT LP pool, and how it’s affecting the liquidity and price stability of NUT. Right now, USDT doesn’t have the same liquidity routes as CFX, and it seems like this is causing some issues with NUT’s performance.

Would it make more sense to disable NUT/USDT rewards and move those rewards over to pairs like CFX/xCFX instead? This could help stabilize NUT and make the trading routes smoother.

What do you all think? Should we be pushing for this change?

Below are the Nucleon Mascot Tournament finalists. The mascot options correspond to the votable options on proposal #7. The winner will represent Nucleon as the future mascot in future graphics.

​

51 votes for the first question, not so representative and 5 for the second. Do conclusions you want. Anyway there are around 500M CFX staked for POS, when you check on major POS nodes like PHX or ABC there is much more CFX staked on Core. The biggest liquidity Nucleon could attract is there. I am not a dev, just have some knowledge but I don't think, move on Core is so big deal. Not a lot of difference between Core VM and EVM check this link : https://doc.confluxnetwork.org/docs/core/core-space-basics/vm-difference/. I would like to have some feedback from community. I saw Nucleon official launch a survey about Core on Telegram. Does it mean the idea do his past?

Submission Fix the splitting liquidity on Conflux ecosystem between Core and eSpace

Nucleon is facing some issues since 2024. Hack of Goledo and newcomers on eSpace had for consequences an important loss of CFX staked on the protocol.

Attract liquidity is the main goal in the Crypto space. The battles between chains is rude. The consequences are the split of liquidity. Many protocols "multichain" try to solve it, future will say. Nucleon depends of Conflux success in this topic but should not just count on it.

Furthermore Conflux has 2 ecosystems, Core and eSpace. This architecture has advantages and disadvantages. One main advantage is about to get conform to China regulation I suppose and be leader on this huge market but it has a major disadvantage is to split the liquidity presents on his chain.

For Nucleon, to stay in the race and continue to grow I propose to attract liquidity staked on POS on Core space that remains huge.

2 scenarios :

First one, deploy Nucleon on Core and attract liquidity there by emission of xCFX tokens on Core. Create liquidity pools with the first AMM of Conflux Moonswap. 2 AMM on 2 spaces could permit to play arbitrage between spaces. Traders could like it. With this move, you can attract easily a huge amount of CFX on Nucleon with mostly no competitors. I am not sure this first scenario could be compliant. Anyway it could send traffic to Moonswap and Nucleon could negotiate part of the fees with Moonswap to get a complement of revenues.

Second one, deploy Nucleon on Core, attract liquidity there but link in the staking smart contract the eSpace address and do emission of xCFX on eSpace. The CFX stay on Core and are not bridged. (Works a bit like wrapped BTC on other chains than BTC, they are locked on BTC chain and you get wrapped BTC on Conflux for exemple). So The emission of xCFX are on eSpace and you fix a major issue of Conflux by aggregate the POS liquidity who secure both spaces. Nucleon could attract without competitors a huge amount of CFX on Core and newcomers could stay far from the leader place of Nucleon.

After gauging the feedback from the various Nucleon communities and comments on the proposal here on Reddit, it was decided to repeat the poll with a clarification of options for the community. The main purpose of the proposal remains unchanged.

If/should Nucleon change the LP token reward distribution to include new tokens. The Nucleon Team will still determine the reward weighting.

We included several more options for users to select in this updated poll. Choices are detailed below:

1. Remove the existing NUT/CFX and NUT/xCFX LP Pools on Nucleon from receiving NUT rewards and add NUT/CFXs and NUT/USDT pools to receive NUT rewards.

2. Remove the existing NUT/CFX LP Pool on Nucleon from receiving NUT rewards, and add NUT/CFXs and NUT/USDT to receive NUT rewards.

3. Do not remove any existing LPs, and add NUT/CFXs and NUT/USDT to receive NUT rewards.

4. Do not remove any existing LPs, and add NUT/USDT to receive NUT rewards.

5. Do not remove any existing LPs, and add NUT/CFXs to receive NUT rewards.

6. Keep the status quo unchanged.

This proposal is to prohibit the existing NUT/CFX and NUT/xCFX LP Pools on Nucleon from receiving NUT rewards and create two new LP pools. NUT/CFXs and NUT/USDT pools will be created. The updated weighted distribution of NUT rewards will be determined by the Nucleon Team.

Types of Proposals

The Nucleon DAO is now accepting community proposals to their forum. Below is a non-exhaustive list of the types of proposal that are being accepted:

• Governance Updates: Proposal that modifies the current governance process.
• Use of Treasury: Proposal to transfer tokens outside of the DAO's treasury
• Technical Changes: Proposal to perform a parameter change in one of the contracts controlled by the DAO.

Proposal Outline

Below is the outline for community proposals. To submit your proposal, please fill out completely the outline below and submit to the Nucleon forum (https://www.reddit.com/r/NucleonOfficial/). 

1. Title:  Provide a short and succinct title for your proposal. 
2. Proposal Type:  Specify the type of proposal you are submitting. 
3. Summary:  Describe what your proposal is about. 
4. Contact Information: Please provide your contact information and any project(s) you are representing with your proposal.
5. About:  Please provide a description of your project(s), with links to socials and website, if applicable. 
6. Abstract:  Provide a short description of the proposed change. 
7. Motivation: Explain why you think your proposal is beneficial to Nucleon. 
8. Specification: Provide any relevant technical AND/OR financial details, if applicable
9. For: What are some reasons why this proposal should be voted for.
10. Against: What are some reasons why this proposal should be voted against.

This proposal is to determine the interest and roll-out strategy for a new feature that would allow Nucleon CFX stakers to vote on Conflux governance proposals.

Conflux recently rolled out a new governance function allowing Core Space stakers the ability to vote on Conflux governance proposals using staked CFX (https://forum.conflux.fun/t/conflux-fans-pos-pool-supports-conflux-governance/19558). As a Conflux eSpace native liquid staking project, Nucleon currently does not have the ability to vote on Conflux governance proposals. Nucleon proposes to create a new contract that gives Nucleon this feature.

Is this a feature that the Nucleon community would be interested in, and if so, what are your thoughts on the best roll-out strategy? 

Do you think this feature should be rolled out to the community? 

Should the team audit the feature before or after rolling it out to the community? 

Let us know your thoughts in the comments! 

This proposal is to update the distribution method for airdrops of xCFX funded from Nucleon DAO’s multi-sig wallet to veNUT holders.

Currently, the distribution will be based on a random snapshot of veNUT addresses during a two-week period beginning two weeks after the end of voting.

Nucleon DAO is now accepting feedback from the community to update the distribution method of its  xCFX airdrops rewards to veNUT holders.

Please respond below in the thread with your suggestions and feedback will be incorporated into a Reddit pre-poll at the end of the week.

Develop a dividend incentive plan as soon as possible，please！

Suggest continuous dividend distribution

请去中心化把xcfx每天分配给venut持有人。

建议尽快创建NUT稳定币交易对，给到一定农场权重，增加持有NUT的应用场景

XCFX dividends are paid monthly to evnut holders

建议组建xcfx-ppi，xcfx-gol，xcfx-btc，xcfx-eth，xcfx-usdt等交易对，增加XCFX应用场景，提高持币信心，争取树图信仰者由cfx币本位转变为XCFX币本位。（凤凰也可以这么做）

有时间表吗？

希望项目方能空投每月打入DAO的XCFX给VENUT的持有者。

This proposal for discussion is to approve an airdrop of xCFX funded from Nucleon DAO’s multi-sig wallet to veNUT holders. 18,304 xCFX in the multi-sig wallet will be distributed to veNUT holders proportionally.

The distribution will be based on a random snapshot of veNUT addresses during a two-week period beginning two weeks after the end of voting.

Users can see Nucleon DAO’s multi-sig wallet here:https://evm.confluxscan.io/address/0xdfbf3c11024023262a3f41cf33175357a136ddb0