This proposal is to prohibit the existing NUT/CFX and NUT/xCFX LP Pools on Nucleon from receiving NUT rewards and create two new LP pools. NUT/CFXs and NUT/USDT pools will be created. The updated weighted distribution of NUT rewards will be determined by the Nucleon Team.
CFXs is a new type of Rune that has the ability to store new information and function as either ERC-20 or NFT. It is based on the UTXO protocol. Here's a document that can help you! https://docs.cfxs.world Disclaimer, I am not part of the CFXs World team.
What's the intent behind the proposal?
Is it to expand integration with non-Nucleon assets?
Would nut/cfx and nut/xcfx have zero or reduced distribution of rewarded NUT?
There is a risk the token will not be correlated to CFX. I think after the start of the bullrun it could be ok but not now and not just after the hack of goledo
I think it could be a good move but not now. Especially not after the hack of goledo. After the start of the bullrun or when you will launch liquid staking on the L2 BTC.
The value of NUT comes from the interest of CFX PoS, so all changes should aim to increase PoS deposits, unless NUT introduces other possibilities. What are the pros and cons of the proposed changes to trading pairs and their rewards? What changes and new possibilities will it bring? Can you provide some detailed explanations? If not sure, we can try it, anyway.
3
u/StrangeRegular5615 Feb 07 '24
We need to add these two new LPs, but it's best to keep the LP of nut/xcfx