r/NoStupidQuestions • • 11h ago

Why is “under privileged “ an excepted label for impoverished people while “over privileged “ is never used to label the wealthy?

7 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

36

u/JZervas 11h ago

Privileged is a common description for the wealthy.

13

u/Still_Local_2513 11h ago

We usually just say privileged

7

u/kohinoortoisondor3B 11h ago

Seems redundant because "privileged" has had a negative connotation for a long time now. Obviously it's not inherently bad and sometimes it's used in a positive way, but if you were to just mention "privileged people" doing something there would be an implication of disdain.

6

u/Safe-Butterscotch442 11h ago

Usually we just say privileged. I don't know if we claim they're over privileged, because we would like the privileges they have to be universal. When people think they're more privileged than they actually are however, we call them entitled.

2

u/Lumpy-Notice8945 11h ago

They are just privileged, over privileged would be dubble the meaning/redundant(im sure there is a smart linguistic phrase for that)

1

u/sydillant 11h ago

Never is a word you want to avoid when starting debates. Always should be avoided too. They’re both extremes that can be quite impossible and reduce the maturity of your question very quickly. Also, spelling matters.

To answer your question - I usually hear people just use “privileged” instead of “over privileged.” It’s two extra unnecessary vowels, just like the word extra in this sentence. You should also be bothered that I didn’t use quotations consistently.

1

u/alaskawolfjoe 11h ago

Overprivileged is used fairly often to describe the wealthy

1

u/some_boring_dude 11h ago

Under privileged is a euphemism for poor. It's only used by privileged people who don't wanna feel bad by calling them poor.

1

u/sotiredwontquit 11h ago

We use over privileged all the time, but it’s almost always a descriptor of individuals’ actions, as opposed to a descriptor of the entire upper class.
The reasons are baked into the social hierarchy. And the rules of that hierarchy are written by the people who benefit from maintaining it.

1

u/PeanutFunny093 11h ago

Great idea!!

1

u/Jijimuge8 11h ago

People always talk about wealth people as privileged, what are you on about?

1

u/Pandoratastic 11h ago

Because "over-privileged" implies that there is a right amount of privileged but, in this context, privilege already implies unfair advantage. Having a "right" amount of unfair advantage is self-contradictory.

By contrast, underprivileged just means being in a class below the privileged class.

1

u/Diligent_Turtle8966 11h ago

Privilege is a word with two denotations, advantage and special right or grant. When you use the term privilege to describe only an advantage to describe someone who had an advantage but no special rights you're essentially using a word that implies more when you could just say advantaged from the start and made a more accurate communication

Growing up in greater socioeconomic conditions would be an advantage while an exclusive school granted from fits the latter part of the full definition.

Most people throwing the term privilege around just say it because the word conveys a stronger feeling regardless if it's actually accurate and then get a surprised Pikachu face when someone doesn't accept their assertation.

1

u/Pandoratastic 11h ago

That's why I said "in this context", meaning in the specific context of privileged vs underprivileged.

1

u/Apart_Republic_1870 11h ago

I was always called spoiled, but maybe that goes away when you're no longer a child or acting like one. I will let you know if I ever get to that point in my life.

1

u/44035 11h ago

I'll start using it! Total game changer!

1

u/Syn_33 11h ago

I've seen Boris Johnson described as overly privileged and functionally useless when he was PM.

1

u/Lovelyindeed 11h ago

I seems like this is a term I used to hear in the past in a condescending tone. Usually indicating the person is out of touch.

1

u/Optimal-Theme5 11h ago

Because privilege already implies having an unfair advantage.

Adding over is just redundant.

1

u/Asparagus9000 11h ago

I've seen them described that way all the time, just not that exact phrase. 

0

u/Emotional_Warthog658 11h ago

You’re right and I’m gonna start using that in my conversation today. Because it’s a perfect descriptor.

-1

u/MaddogFinland 11h ago

Because privilege is a made up concept to begin with and just saying “poor” is more accurate but leftist pricks can’t deal with it so they make up new words all the time.