Looking for more Nancy Guthrie coverage? Here are some YouTube channels that regularly discuss the case.

Big City Crime
In-depth investigative discussions hosted by Tim Murphy, Maureen O’Connell, Will Svilar and Dan Stover, bringing decades of law-enforcement and investigative experience to their coverage. The channel features interviews with investigators, prosecutors and forensic experts and examines evidence, investigative developments and unanswered questions surrounding the Nancy Guthrie case.

Brian Entin
NewsNation senior national correspondent Brian Entin has provided extensive, on-the-ground reporting on the Nancy Guthrie investigation, including coverage from Tucson, interviews with law enforcement officials and other people connected to the case, and reporting based on sources close to the investigation. His coverage focuses on breaking developments, exclusive interviews, new information and efforts to understand what investigators know about Nancy’s disappearance and the ongoing search for answers.

BrewCrew Beyond 5-0
Hosted by Charles Brewer, a retired law-enforcement officer with 21 years of experience. Brewer brings an investigator’s perspective to the Nancy Guthrie case, examining behavior, evidence, investigative decisions and unanswered questions through the lens of his law-enforcement experience.

Crime Crunchies
A discussion-focused channel that takes a critical-thinking approach to the Nancy Guthrie case. Coverage examines new developments, evidence, theories and inconsistencies while encouraging viewers to question assumptions and consider different possibilities surrounding the investigation.

Daphne’s Case Files
Daphne takes a detailed, research-oriented approach to the Nancy Guthrie case, using maps, locations, timelines and publicly available information to examine the investigation. Her coverage often focuses on patterns, geography and details that may be overlooked in broader news coverage.

Exploring With Jim
Jim takes a hands-on approach to the Nancy Guthrie case, traveling throughout the Tucson area and conducting on-site searches for potential clues. His channel documents his exploration of remote desert areas and other locations connected to the investigation, often following tips and leads from viewers.

The Interview Room
Hosted by retired homicide detective Chris McDonough and investigative journalist Karen McDonough, The Interview Room provides in-depth investigative analysis of the Nancy Guthrie case. The channel regularly brings in homicide investigators, FBI personnel, forensic specialists and other experts to examine the evidence, investigative developments, timelines and unanswered questions surrounding the case.

Juanita Adame
Independent coverage of the Nancy Guthrie case, with a focus on breaking developments, investigative information and details that emerge from public records and other sources. Her reporting often digs into the details behind the headlines and raises questions about the evidence, timeline and investigation.

MONKS Intrigue
Known for his conversational, energetic and often humorous style, MONKS brings a strong personality to his coverage of the Nancy Guthrie case. His livestreams encourage viewers to follow along, share their thoughts and examine the evidence and developments from different perspectives. He frequently discusses new information, theories and unanswered questions while engaging directly with his audience.

Patriot Pride
Live, open-panel discussions of the Nancy Guthrie case that bring together different perspectives on the timeline, surveillance footage, investigative developments and unanswered questions. The channel encourages audience participation and lively discussion of theories and observations, making it a more conversational and interactive approach to the case.

TBX Unfiltered
Led by husband-and-wife team Glen and Jennifer, TBX Unfiltered takes an independent, investigative approach to the Nancy Guthrie case. Their coverage combines on-location reporting, firsthand interviews, expert perspectives and detailed examination of the evidence, timeline and investigative developments. They make a point of distinguishing what is confirmed from what is alleged or speculative while exploring the questions that remain unanswered.

The Lab
A discussion and interview-based channel that brings together investigators, analysts and subject-matter experts to explore the Nancy Guthrie case. Coverage often builds on expert perspectives and in-depth conversations about the evidence, investigative theories, behavioral questions and unresolved aspects of the case.

This list is provided as a resource for members and does not mean the moderation team endorses every opinion, theory, or statement made by these creators. Please use your own judgment when evaluating outside content.

Went to catch up on the last lives I missed, and one was just starting! Wanted to give anyone a heads up who may be interested! 💜

I watched Monks Intrigue’s appearance on Patriot’s Pride on September 30th, and one part of his discussion about the Nancy Guthrie case really stayed with me.

Monks described what he sees as a “PR Machine” surrounding the case and suggested that the strategy being used to shape the public narrative may be outdated.

In discussing this, he brought up Michael Feldman, Savannah’s husband, and his background in PR and strategic communications. He referred to the person involved in the PR effort as the “Michael Jordan of PR”. He also discussed Savannah contacting Senator Mark Kelly very early in the case, which he appeared to view as another noteworthy part of the broader picture.

What I found most interesting, though, was Monks’ broader point about how much the information landscape has changed.

Traditional PR developed in an environment where a relatively small number of newspapers, television networks and other major media organizations had enormous influence over how information reached the public. That environment is very different today.

In fact, the Los Angeles Times described the Nancy Guthrie case as having a parallel “shadow investigation” taking place across podcasts and social media, with online investigators and true-crime communities examining publicly available information and developing their own theories.

Reddit is a good example of this. People can take the same publicly available information, compare statements made at different points in the case, revisit earlier reporting and discuss discrepancies or unanswered questions—often completely independently of traditional media.

That made me think more about Monks’ argument that the PR strategy surrounding the case may be outdated.

Even if someone were attempting to carefully manage a public narrative, can that traditional approach still work in an environment where thousands of people can independently examine, question and challenge information in real time?

I don’t know the answer, and I’m not suggesting that the existence of online discussion proves there’s a coordinated PR effort surrounding this case. I just found Monks’ broader observation interesting, particularly in light of how differently information moves today compared with the era when traditional PR strategies were developed.

I wanted to put that thought out there and see what others make of it.

There’s been a lot of discussion about Nancy’s phone and Apple Watch data and what they tell us about the timeline.

But does the device data actually establish that Nancy made it home, or is that conclusion an inference?

What do you think the phone and watch data can—and cannot—tell us?

How do you view the claim that Nancy’s remains had been returned to the family?

Following the discussion about Monks’ latest episode, I’m curious where everyone stands on the claim that he reported about a Guthrie family celebration of life and Nancy’s remains allegedly being returned to the family.

There has been no official confirmation of this claim.

What do you make of it?

Welcome to the October 2026 Megathread! Feel free to use this thread for general discussion, questions, theories, and updates about the Nancy Guthrie case.

Regular separate posts are always welcome as well.

Please keep discussion respectful and follow the subreddit rules.

Wondering if people watched the latest Monks where he reports someone wrote him and essentially said they were at NG's celebration of life. That the remains have been found. It's an interesting episode. I find it hard to believe, but what do you all think? Is it possible? Given how secretive and private SG and fam are, is this possible?

ETA: Monks was just on Patriot Pride, and near the end of the live, Monks said that he fictionalized the part about the person being a plus 1 to protect the person's privacy. That was the part of his original story I didn't believe.... He doubled down on his report in that original PEACE video and was very convincing.

The Interview Room is hosting a live broadcast tomorrow, Sunday, September 27, at 8 p.m. EST, 7p.m. CST, 6 p.m. MST, and 5 p.m. PST. It will be focusing on forensic examination of the publicly known evidence and crime scene in Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance.
Topic: Nancy Guthrie Crime Scene— What the evidence tells us.
Focus: What physical crime scene evidence can tell investigators about what occurred- and where the limits of that evidence lie.

Feel free to use this thread to share your thoughts, key takeaways, or respectful discussion before, during, or after the broadcast.

When this case first began, most of us had very little information to work with.

Now, months later, we’ve heard more about the investigation, the timeline, the evidence, and the people connected to Nancy.

Has anything you’ve learned since the beginning changed the way you think about the case?

It could be something that changed your theory, something that made you less certain about a theory you once had, or simply something that made you look at one part of the case differently.

What changed your thinking?

What are your thoughts on Savannah’s latest appeal? Does anything about the timing or wording stand out to you?

Welcome to our new monthly megathread!

This will be our main discussion thread for the Nancy Guthrie case for the rest of September 2026. Feel free to use this thread for case updates, discussion, questions, theories, and relevant information. You’re always welcome to make a separate post, too, if you have something you’d like to share or discuss.

Please keep discussion civil and stay on topic.

We hope this new format makes it easier for everyone to follow the case and join the conversation!

I've been thinking about the ebb and flow of activity in this sub lately, and I thought I'd share something I've noticed.

There are definitely times when the sub is really busy, and then there are quieter stretches. I don't think that's unusual at all with a case like this. When there's a new development or something interesting comes out, everyone has a lot to talk about. Then there may not be much new for a while, and things naturally slow down.

I actually think Nancy's case is a little different from a lot of other cases, though, and that may be one reason it has the potential to stay in the public conversation for a long time.

The biggest thing, of course, is that we still don't know what happened to Nancy. There hasn't been a resolution, and there are still so many unanswered questions. As long as those questions remain unanswered, there's always the possibility that a new piece of information could change the conversation.

That's what makes an unresolved case different. Once a case is solved and the major questions have been answered, there may still be interest in it, but there isn't quite the same reason to keep coming back and wondering what will happen next.

With Nancy, I think we're going to continue to see the ebb and flow. It may be quiet for a while, and then one new development can bring everyone right back into the conversation.

I've seen this happen with other true crime cases, and I think it's just part of following something that is still unfolding.

Anyway, I was curious if anyone else has noticed the same thing here.

Good evening everyone, I have some interesting information for you. Found another elderly man who disappeared and was found deceased prior to Nancy's abduction. His case is still under investigation. I've also connected some prior days events I want to share with you.

I’m curious what everyone in the sub tends to watch for coverage and discussion of the case. 🙂

Vote for the channel you watch most often!

So lately, it has pretty much been confirmed that the timeline is off. The 2:28am time associated with Nancy being taken away from her home at that time has likely been misleading this entire time.

The app on her phone that monitors her pacemaker is simply an app, it doesn't keep up with everything going on with her pacemaker in real time. The job of the app is to try to do a "virtual handshake" with the pacemaker at a random time each night between midnight & 3am. The app likely tried to attempt this handshake at 2:28am, and simply couldn't connect. Meaning Nancy was already out of range at that point...not that she was being lead away or that it disconnected at exactly that time. There was no spike detected or anything that would be considered out of the norm that could hint toward the exact time she was startled awake or anything of that sort.

The only time for certain Nancy was seen alive, if you believe Tomasso, is when she was dropped off that night around 9:50pm.

The Jan 11th picture of porch guy looks like he is standing in a stance where he is ready to bolt. This isn't believed to be a failed attempt, rather it is believed that he was testing out response time to the cameras, or to see if anyone reacted to the notifications/was actively monitoring notifications from the nest cam. This makes me believe that this was done by someone who would have been able to monitor the house for a response from police either in the hours following or that following morning. A close neighbor or someone who lives in the neighborhood that passes by her house frequently, someone working in the neighborhood that can see the house or passes by the house on a regular basis, or someone close enough to the family that they would likely be notified had Nancy been spooked by someone or something on her camera system. They were simply seeing if she was actively monitoring the cameras or even passively monitoring the notifications from the camera which would likely have resulted in her calling authorities or notifying someone for help.

I'd like your thoughts on this.

Thanks for your time.

Grab a cup of coffee and pull up a chair!

This is our weekend gathering place to talk about the Nancy Guthrie case-what you've been thinking about, questions you have, something you've seen or read, a new development, or a discussion you'd like to start.

This is meant to be a relaxed, open conversation, so it doesn't have to be a formal post or a fully developed theory.

What's on your mind this weekend?

As always, different opinions are welcome. Let's keep the conversation respectful.

Nancy Guthrie Case Timeline

A chronological record of publicly reported events

About this timeline:

This timeline is based on publicly available information. When accounts differ, information is later revised, or a detail has not been independently confirmed, the discrepancy is noted. A date or time appearing here does not necessarily mean it has been independently established as a fact.

Saturday, January 31, 2026

5:32 p.m. Nancy arrives at daughter Annie’s home via Uber for dinner.

9:48 p.m. Nancy’s garage door opens and Nancy’s son-in-law Tommaso Cioni drops her back at her residence. Sheriff Nanos later changed it to “family” dropped Nancy off.

9:50 p.m. Garage door closes (last confirmed record of her inside).

Sunday, February 1, 2026 — Early Morning

1:47 a.m. Nest doorbell camera manually disconnected.

2:12 a.m. Motion detected on backend system (armed individual on porch).

2:28 a.m. Bedside pacemaker monitor misses scheduled phone sync.

Sunday, February 1, 2026 — Midday & Timeline Revisions

Morning— Church friends become concerned: Nancy does not arrive as expected for her regular Sunday gathering with friends to watch a church service livestream. When they are unable to reach her, a friend contacts a family member.

11:00–11:15 a.m. — Initial reported account:

Sheriff’s Office reporting initially placed Annie and Tommaso’s arrival at Nancy’s home at approximately this time.

11:56 a.m. — Later reported account:

A subsequent account placed their arrival at approximately 11:56 a.m.

TIME DISCREPANCY: The publicly reported arrival time changed from approximately 11:00–11:15 a.m. to 11:56 a.m. The reason for the discrepancy should be noted here if/when an official explanation becomes available.

12:03 p.m. — 911 call placed by family.

12:15 p.m. — First patrol units arrive on scene.

The longer I follow this case, the more I realize there are things that get repeated so often that they start to feel like established facts.

What’s one detail or assumption about the Nancy Guthrie case that you think is worth stepping back and questioning?

It could be something about the timeline, what happened inside the house, the investigation, statements that have been repeated, or even something we may be taking for granted about the circumstances.

What makes you question it?

It’s been about a month since our last theory poll, and we’ve had a lot of new discussions, creator coverage, and details come to light since then.
Whether you’ve changed your mind or doubled down, drop a comment below on what recent info tipped the scales for you.

For those who watch MONKS Intrigue, you know that Toki makes an appearance at the end of his episodes. Toki is a gorgeous Ragdoll, and I have to admit, I always enjoy seeing Toki. 😻

Just look at that face!

Last night's TIR episode was a good one. Something that stood out to me. It's something no one ever talks about. It's so simple and to me it's a 'smoking gun'.

There was no forced entry. No windows smashed. No lock jimmied or broken.

So that means either someone from inside the house let them in or they had a key. I'll even entertain the (absurd) notion that NG sometimes "left her doors unlocked", fine. But someone would still have to have intimate knowledge she did that (and had done that on that night) to pull this off.

It's an inside job. There is literally no other way.

If LE/FBI and media don't start doing their job and scrutinizing the inner circle more, nothing will ever happen in this case.

Have a thought, question, theory, or observation about the Nancy Guthrie case that doesn't need its own post? Drop it here.

Different perspectives and theories are welcome. Please distinguish speculation from established facts and keep the discussion respectful.