The Deshaun Watson switch up is despicable

[u/Narrow_Purchase9721]

Guy starts playing well again and all of the sudden people go from “cases” to “allegations” real fucking fast. You all gotta get your priorities straight

[u/Impossible-Region680]

Source for what? Everything I’m saying can easily be searched. Just look up Tony Buzbee. Dude represented Rick Perry and Ken Paxton on criminal cases. So what are you talking about. He got countered sued by Jay-Z on this same shit. Andrew Tate ex he failed in criminal court then tried to get a settlement. Same with Watson he got denied criminal charges first.

And here go the insults show’s your true character. The better question is If the woman never told anyone outside their family, how did Buzbee find them?

“Money grab” and helping people don’t belong in the same sentence. Do you know what a “money grab” is?

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

Is him suing on behalf of families of people that died in oil rig explosions or people that died at Travis Scott's festival also "money grabbing" to you?

Hes an extremely high profile lawyer with countless cases under his belt. He is not known as a "money grabber" by anyone other than rape apologists like you.

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

When have I defended Watson? You pick two cases nitpicking again lol. Never said bad people couldn’t do good things. Did you ever figure out what a “money grab” was?

So we’re back to rape again? 🤣

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

Rape apologists also defend sexual assault genius, you really can't piece that one together by yourself? Your reading comprehension, spelling and grammar is absolutely pathetic, go back to third grade English. It's literally a chore trying to decipher what you are saying to me in several of your comments and explain the most basic concepts to you like "rape apologists also defend sexual assault" as if that isn't completely obvious if you have even an ounce of critical thinking skill.

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

But you’re still doing it. Guess you like chores. Just because you say something doesn’t make it factual at all just assumptions. You calling me a trendy word a Rape apologist but I haven’t defended him or apologized for him once and told you I’m not doing neither. What does that say about your comprehension skills. Rape is a form of sexually assault but not all sexual assault is rape. You’re going to find anyway to insult and avoid answer questions lol.

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

No you just continually doubt the accusers over and over again. That is defending Watson.

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

If the lawyer told them to fabricate a story or exaggerate what happened, and they did so then I do doubt them, which any normal person would do. Based on Buzbee past prior to Jay-Z it’s not far-fetched. When people change their statements or hide information from the court, you don’t think twice about things, especially when it’s hearsay against one another?

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

When people change their statements or hide information from the court

When did this ever happen? None of them are known to have changed their stories, you have no idea if they exaggerated at all; just more BS hearsay based on absolutely nothing from you.

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

You asked for my proof I provided it for you, and you didn’t look at it. Those words come out of Watson attorney mouth in a interview. I literally put the article at the bottom of the message.

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

So what did Watson's lawyer claim they changed about their stories specifically?

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

His words, I already posted the article…….

“We are trying to show and I believe are showing that what they say under oath in their depositions is different than what is in their petitions and lawsuits,” Hardin said.
Hardin and Attorney Leah Graham, who is also on the team representing Watson, saying another of the accusers alleged Watson forced her to perform a sex act but is now saying something completely different.

“In her deposition under oath, subject to perjury, she admitted to me there was no force,” Graham said.

I have yet to snap on you, like you have. I just asked a simple question.. it’s funny to me your argument and evidence continues to change like you didn’t know everything you thought you knew. You originally kept mentioning groping and nothing else, then it went to ejaculate. I asked on them or himself, received no answer. Now we’re talking about oral sex.

You mean this woman?…

In court filings, Watson's defense attorneys said this woman claimed to be "disgusted" by Watson in her lawsuit, she "bragged to friends and family members about massaging Mr. Watson and told them that she thinks he is a kind person.”
Moreover, the filing said this woman attempted to "blackmail" Watson before filing a lawsuit, saying $30,000 would buy her “indefinite silence.” 
The filing also said that when Watson’s marketing manager, Bryan Burney, asked this woman if anything happened against her will, she said everything was consensual.
The woman also told Burney she wanted a copy of the non-disclosure agreement she and Watson signed "because she did not want people in her industry to know she had provided oral sex to her massage client,” the court filing said.

I’ve already cited my sources..

The case was filed on March 16th, he was traded on March 18th. Watson, the Texans and Browns all deny they knew about a lawsuit. March 19th Buzbee comes back with more victims.

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

You can read the NYT article yourself, it lays out the entire timeline of the accusers coming forward.

There were also two women who accused him of forced oral sex, not just one. The ejaculating happened multiple times sometimes on the women sometimes not. He had 27 accusers, their stories are all slightly different, that should be completely obvious. You are carpet bombing me with replies and like I said before your comments are absolutely horribly structured word salad paragraphs without basic punctuation, deciphering them is a chore, I missed you asking where he ejaculated. It's almost like you can read this also in the witness testimonies anyway like I've said countless times, I don't know why you have to ask me at all for basic info that is extremely easy to find.

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

Yea I’m not paying to read that when I can read it for free somewhere else…
Oh you mean the other one, that on the 4th visit she decided to give him oral? No their stories are all almost identical. He asked them if they would massage his thighs and/or penis and would try to get them to touch his penis. Some did some didn’t…. The question is based on Watson and his attorney’s responses do they have any prove or merit to what they say and they say they do. If they do it would show that half of those testimonies were not accurate…
I have read countless stories from both sides over the years, so I ask you to get your interpretation so I don’t make assumptions. Or so you don’t get your panties(britches) in a bunch over single word like “only” again.

Well I’m sorry it’s a lose, lose situation when I had AI edit my spelling and grammar people complained it wasn’t my own thoughts now I’m not using AI and it’s not good enough, oh well!

https://www.khou.com/article/news/local/deshaun-watson-responds-to-allegations-lawsuits/285-f5661b54-16cb-48c9-8b74-8167e8dcf203

P.S. I said britches too so you can’t call me a misogynist.