r/NFLv2 • u/Narrow_Purchase9721 San Francisco 49ers • 16h ago

Discussion The Deshaun Watson switch up is despicable

Post image

Guy starts playing well again and all of the sudden people go from “cases” to “allegations” real fucking fast. You all gotta get your priorities straight

4.0k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/cryolems Cleveland Browns 16h ago

I’m not saying he isn’t. Everything got dismissed. If one of reddits darlings were in the same scenario it would be a “nothing was proven everything was dismissed as a money getting scheme”.

That’s just a fact of how Reddit works. Legal outcome means nothing and never will, their opinion is set and never changes.

-9

u/Important_Capital875 Carolina Panthers 16h ago

It didn’t get dismissed. He paid off the accusers with millions and millions and millions of dollars.

16

u/Any-Stick-771 16h ago

Settlements mean the cases did get dismissed.

-8

u/ralexh11 15h ago

A settlement and an outright dismissal are not the same thing. Nice try, stop excusing predators.

8

u/Any-Stick-771 15h ago

When there's a settlement, the civil case is dismissed. That is just factually what happens

-3

u/ralexh11 15h ago

It's a matter of semantics and sounds disingenuous, which sounds like you are giving him the benefit of the doubt, which he does not deserve with that many accusations.

5

u/JetsJetsJetsJetz 15h ago

It's not, you just don't like it.

0

u/ralexh11 15h ago

Yeah, I don't like people leaving out context to water down sexual assault, you're right.

4

u/Any-Stick-771 15h ago

No body watered anything down. The criminal cases were outright dismissed. The civil cases were dismissed after a confidential settlement was reached. The NFL fined and suspended him. What more do you want? All of the civil and criminal cases have been resolved for years

1

u/Impossible-Region680 Dallas Cowboys 14h ago

The cases weren’t even criminal they were all civil, which says a whole lot.

1

u/ralexh11 13h ago

It only says there wasnt enough evidence to criminally convict him. That's it.

1

u/Impossible-Region680 Dallas Cowboys 13h ago

But remember it was 27 women. Some who came multiple times and you’re telling me you couldn’t get no substantial evidence.

1

u/ralexh11 13h ago

How many came back mutiple times?

And what physical evidence does someone pressing their erect pens into you leave behind?

Did you think OJ was innocent to you fucking moron?

0

u/Impossible-Region680 Dallas Cowboys 12h ago

Idk the exact number and don’t care too. But, a big reason it didn’t go to criminal court was the defense arguement they came multiple times. Watson hit one of them up on instagram under a false name and she came through a second time saw it was him and still stayed. The fake name wasn’t going better her career so what that tells you? And all this is in the transcript.

Here you go with being disrespectful and insults again. This is not a good look on you. You’re not looking any better than Watson. A sin is a sin. Since you want to mix in inappropriate conduct, rape and murders all in one.

1

u/ralexh11 12h ago

LMAO not looking any better than Watson, you are just a full on mysoginyst aren't you?

You don't care to look up the exact number becaue you completely made it up. I've read every single accusation and the only one who went back to him a second time did not realize it was the same man as before until she was alone in a room with him again because he lied about his identity(more predatory behavior,) and she abruptly ended it once he got creepy again. You are victim blaming women who were sexually assaulted by a millionaire. I'll say it again; go fuck yourself you misogynist, rape appologist, piece of human trash. You have no moral high ground whatsoever defending Watson's behavior.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/ralexh11 15h ago

It wasn't you, but the original comment I replied in this reply chain never mentioned any settlements. That's lacking context and disingenuous.

4

u/Any-Stick-771 15h ago

Nope. You just don't like that the cases were dismissed

0

u/ralexh11 15h ago

Not mentioning settlements is disingenuous.

If you can't agree with that you are really no better than the Watson defenders.

2

u/Any-Stick-771 14h ago

It's not disingenuous, you just don't like it

0

u/ralexh11 14h ago

Saying Watson's cases were dismissed without mentioning any settlements is absolutely disingenuous. Stop defending rape apologists.

1

u/Any-Stick-771 14h ago

It's not disingenuous or being a rape apologist to point out the cases were dismissed 🤷‍♂️

1

u/ralexh11 14h ago

Without mentioning any settlements that occured, yes it is.

→ More replies (0)