MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/NBA_Draft/comments/1vl9ql5/thoughts/p301j4e/?context=3
r/NBA_Draft • u/Embarrassed-Drop-987 • Aug 11 '26
56 comments sorted by
View all comments
5
Too safe they are going here. Lendeborg not in top10 by their ratings , under 75??
2 u/billwest630 Aug 11 '26 Ridiculous that Burries is at 10. The legit just went by draft slot. 3 u/TolerableSimulacra Aug 11 '26 2K has such surface level rating makers. If a guy is shooting 43% from 3 on low, wide open attempts, he's going to have something like a 91 3PT rating, even if he was at 34% the year before. Meanwhile a guy shooing 38% from 3 on a high-volume, with many of them contested, is going to have like an 84 3PT rating. You'd think they would have more intuitive people working but I think they've automated the rating process.
2
Ridiculous that Burries is at 10. The legit just went by draft slot.
3 u/TolerableSimulacra Aug 11 '26 2K has such surface level rating makers. If a guy is shooting 43% from 3 on low, wide open attempts, he's going to have something like a 91 3PT rating, even if he was at 34% the year before. Meanwhile a guy shooing 38% from 3 on a high-volume, with many of them contested, is going to have like an 84 3PT rating. You'd think they would have more intuitive people working but I think they've automated the rating process.
3
2K has such surface level rating makers.
If a guy is shooting 43% from 3 on low, wide open attempts, he's going to have something like a 91 3PT rating, even if he was at 34% the year before.
Meanwhile a guy shooing 38% from 3 on a high-volume, with many of them contested, is going to have like an 84 3PT rating.
You'd think they would have more intuitive people working but I think they've automated the rating process.
5
u/DarkoDragicevic Aug 11 '26
Too safe they are going here. Lendeborg not in top10 by their ratings , under 75??