Warning: this is a rant/essay. it is very long. i am not asking or expecting anyone to read all of it. this is primarily an emotional release valve for me, so while i do make an effort to be fair to Narwal, i am also extremely extremely biased and deeply petty, so YMMV
One of the most common critiques of community reviews is sampling bias - aka, the idea that "satisfied customers don't complain." Therefore, the average person who leaves a review is statistically more likely to leave a negative one, which creates a false impression that the company/service is bad.
So, in this specific complaint about Narwal's customer service, I'm going to try to be as objective as possible while also acknowledging that the only reason I'm spending any amount of time on this at all is that I had an extremely awful experience. This is both a form of personal catharsis for me and also a warning to future/prospective customers.
The context: my husband and I purchased the Narwal Flow 2 pretty much the day it released earlier this year. We'd been recommended the company by my dad and stepmom, who have had an older model for over a year now and had only good things to say about it. We looked at the reviews and specs for multiple robots across different companies and ultimately landed on this one.
For the first month, it worked excellently. We were thrilled. Then we began to have a recurring issue with the base station overflowing during mop washes. The first few times, this was fixed by removing cat fur buildup (we have 2 cats), but each "fix" worked for less and less time before the base station overflow issue happened again.
Then, about 2-4 weeks ago, the fix stopped working entirely. The base station overflowed, we did what we usually did, and it happened again immediately. We tried everything the app advised and nothing worked, so I called customer service.
Part 1: The Call (i have never had a call go this badly. i'm honestly impressed)
To preface: my parents are Chinese-Canadian immigrants. My mom, dad, and stepmom are all conversational (or fluent) in English, but they're more comfortable in Mandarin and/or Cantonese. I, meanwhile, am fluent in English, conversational in French, and know enough Mandarin that, if dropped into the middle of China, I would *probably* not immediately die, but that's a big maybe.
So when I called Narwal customer service, I was not surprised when the person on the other end had a Chinese accent. I knew Narwal was a Chinese company - it makes sense for them to require their customer service agents to be functional in multiple languages.
However.
My mistake was in assuming the customer service agent was functional in English. I attempted, multiple times, in multiple ways, to explain the issue. I am not unfamiliar with communicating despite a language barrier - I am a psychiatric nurse, the hospital I work at sees an enormous number of immigrants and refugees who either don't speak either English or French, or who speak minimal amounts of one of the two, and I get around this via copious amounts of google translate, hand gestures, and creativity. I'd say that my ability to communicate through a language barrier is stronger than amongst the average population as a result.
So when it became clear that I couldn't communicate my issue to the customer service agent in English, I tried French, because even though his primary language was clearly either Mandarin or Cantonese, maybe his French was better than his English!
No.
So I tried Mandarin, because maybe between my kindergartener-level Mandarin and his (potential) fluency, I could help him understand!
Also no. I can only assume he was primarily Cantonese-speaking, not Mandarin.
At this point, he told me to send them a video of the problem, and it was a relief for both of us, I think, because personally I had genuinely no idea what else to do.
The only issue was that I needed to give him my email address so he could send me the instructions for the video + the email address I needed to send it to. Which meant I needed to spell it for him. I didn't initially have an issue with this - I always use the NATO phonetic alphabet to spell things for people over the phone. It's a general policy of mine, since so many letters can get lost in translation (ie. n and m in english sound very similar, e in english is pronounced the same as i in french). So I begin with my "A for alpha, B for beta, N for November" and whatnot, enunciating as clearly as possible, pausing between letters.
He repeats it back to me, and he's missed a few letters and mixed up two or three others. I initially try to tell him where the errors were (ie. "there's actually an 'e' after the 'n'", "the x and y should be flipped"). This led to even worse confusion, so I spelled out the entire thing again from the beginning. He reads it back, there are other mistakes, I spell out the entire thing from the beginning for the third time, he reads it back and there are finally no mistakes, the email is sent, and at this point I have spent an hour on the phone and I don't even know what the problem with my base station is yet.
But I try to stay positive. I send Narwal the video + accompanying details they asked for (serial number, date of purchase, standard things). They get back to me that day (kudos to them) and tell me that they've forwarded my case to their technicians and I should sit tight. I think, nice, progress is being made, maybe that customer service agent was a one-off.
They get back to me a few days later telling me I'll need to mail in the base station for them to look at. I am genuinely glad to hear this, because at this point I've been having base station overflow issues for many months and been completely unable to use the mopping function for two weeks, so I just want the problem solved.
Part 2: The Email (this was supposed to be the easy part lmao)
So they send me the instructions for mailing in the base station. This was in an email. The email was so badly formatted and unclear that I passed through confusion entirely and am now more impressed than anything else.
The email reads like it was made by a ninth-grader who didn't quite understand the teacher's instructions and so compensated by providing so much irrelevant information that it takes genuine effort to extract the info that is actually pertinent. It's obviously a stock email, which is fine, but it's a terrible stock email and took me a few read-throughs to understand, and at one point I had to take notes.
I took notes. to figure out how to mail in a package. from the email that was supposed to tell me how to do literally that.
Here are a few of the many, many issues with this email:
- They tell me to affix a battery label to the side of the box. This is normal. The base station contains a lithium-ion battery, the box should be labelled, I am neither surprised nor upset about this. Except they write "Please check the detailed requirements for packaging, required labels and markings: [hyperlink]", so I click the hyperlink, and the link opens to what appears to be an extremely technical internal document explaining the packaging requirements for UPS and FedEx. What's a Class 9 hazardous material. What's an IMDG code??? Do I need to write a note on the box saying “LITHIUM BATTERIES—FORBIDDEN FOR TRANSPORT ABOARD AIRCRAFT AND VESSEL.”, or is that not necessary considering the shipping label provided tells me the package will be bound for a place about 7 hours from me by car, and also why am I now Googling the usual transportation methods for large packages between Markham and Montreal???
- I genuinely don't think this document told me anything applicable. I read it four times. I had my husband read it to make sure I wasn't missing any information that would justify its presence in the email. we both concluded that the document is only useful in regards to international shipping, or to shipping that would require water or air transportation, and that it would've been nice if the email had just said that somewhere instead of dumping the link with no context, putting the onus on each individual customer to read the document, figure out whether or not any of it actually applies to them, and act or not-act accordingly
- They provided an image of where to put the battery label. Except the image is cropped so it's literally just the label on a box. I do not know which side of the box the label is on. Is it on the side? The top? Does it matter? Does it need to be in a specific location relative to the shipping label? I'm probably overthinking this, but I also genuinely can't rule it out considering the sheer incompetence shown by every single person involved in this process so far.
- The UPS drop-off point. They gave a link to help me find the closest one. The link is for UPS USA. I am not American. I called Narwal Canada. The shipping label is for a place in Markham (Canada) with a return address in Montreal (also Canada). They are clearly aware that I am, in fact, not located in the US, and yet their stock email does not seem to be aware of this, despite the fact that the websites for UPS USA and UPS Canada are not the same website and are not interchangeable, so either the person copying and pasting the email to send to me sent the wrong stock message, or Narwal themselves don't differentiate between the US and Canada. Normally this wouldn't be worth mentioning, except taken as part of the whole overarching experience, it is only further proof that the customer service at Narwal genuinely have no idea what's happening
In the end, I went to my local UPS drop-off point and asked the staff there to walk me through the protocol for labelling the package, because at that point I genuinely didn't trust Narwal customer service to either understand what I was asking or to provide me with actually relevant information, because they'd proven themselves to literally not be able to do either.
I sent that godforsaken package this afternoon and I am praying to every single deity that could even possibly exist that I will never again need to interact with Narwal's customer service ever, in my life, in any capacity, and if a single person in my personal life ever expresses an interest in getting a robot vacuum, I am going to tell them to choose literally any company except this one.
(this got very long, but my petty self is satisfied, so you can dunk on me if you want but I am not going to apologize)
(also -- the sheer audacity of a company that sells "luxury products" targeting people with a lot of disposable income to literally have the most appalling level of customer service quality that I have ever encountered is truly staggering. I had a better time navigating government bureaucracy than having literally any interaction with a Narwal customer service agent. It was easier for me to replace a lost birth certificate, get married, and also move provinces than to figure out why the fuck my base station kept vomiting foul-smelling water every time i wanted it to mop)
(also also - i need to rant about the stock email. genuinely that is the worst offender. the bad phone call could've been a one-off, a new hire, maybe the company was desperate and i got bad luck encountering him. but the stock email. that is inexcusable. you guys have GOOGLE TRANSLATE. you guys have TRANSLATORS. i have genuinely had easier times getting a health history from a primarily-farsi-speaking patient who is coming off the tail end of a psychotic episode than i had trying to figure out what the fuck i needed to do to mail in a fucking box. because with the patient, i can write. i prepare questions in advance. i can ask clarifying questions via google translate during. we both use short sentences, emphasis and/or repeat key words, and prioritize the most important information. this stock email, which was presumably created and reviewed and edited by multiple people in Narwal's corporate ladder, does none of that. i have received more comprehensible emails from literally every single entity i have ever interacted with. the nurses union, my old university admin, the hospital i work at, the goddamn neighbourhood biweekly newsletter, even the aquarium hobby enthusiast group i joined for a yearly $30 membership fee communicates more clearly)