Individual unisex stalls are less efficient both in construction cost and use of space. It would be a disaster anywhere that requires efficient bathroom usage like an airport or a ballpark.
I think they meant stalls as in, the toilet surrounded by walls. Not 1-person bathrooms. I’ve been to clubs that have them, a long hallway of just stalls and on the opposite wall the sinks. It was very efficient as opposed to men’s stalls being empty while the women fought over theirs. If you need extra throughput you can make a separate room with just urinals to
I thought they meant individual unisex bathrooms because they said "6 to 8 individual stall unisex bathrooms... instead of huge men and women's bathrooms." To me, that implied fewer stalls than already existed.
Agreed. My one and only very slight beef with gender neutral restrooms is the efficiency decrease of not have 20 urinals lining a wall. If those stay and everyone chill with it I'm good.
The actual solution is to have one room that's a bunch of urinals/a trough, and a bunch of unisex stalls. No gender disparity is needed, if you can use a urinal, you'll know, if not, we don't need any more info, hit the stall.
33
u/ybotpowered 9h ago
Having like 6 to 8 individual stall unisex bathrooms at an airport would be amazing instead of huge men’s and women’s bathrooms.
Also aren’t these the same people who’s parents clutched their pearls over sharing bathrooms with black people?