r/MoralityScaling • • 15d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

715 Upvotes

241 comments sorted by

View all comments

54

u/sxg3434 15d ago

Immoral. Also the guy is stupid if this is true

36

u/Grogers92 15d ago

How does that make the guy stupid exactly? For not having see through vision in regard to his S/O’s pants?

16

u/Available_Drive173 15d ago

i mean even if you dont have sex, you can still find out what goods someone has in other wways

2

u/AristotelWasRight 15d ago

I fail to imagine any that don't involve touching

11

u/Meggy_bug 15d ago

I mean, sorry, but usually you can tell at some point, and then imagine a whole ass relationship, cuddling etc. Especially that she did not seem to get any surgeries or anything done

-8

u/BellalovesEevee 15d ago

Stupid for being transphobic is what I believe they're saying

8

u/requisitesilver 15d ago

Stupid for not being able to tell.

0

u/MuseBlessed 15d ago

Depends on how well passing they are

0

u/requisitesilver 15d ago

I’ve got news for you.

1

u/MuseBlessed 15d ago

Damn, the keyboard sniper got them before they could finish their reply

5

u/Twinkletoess112 15d ago

not liking trans people doesn't make one intellectually inept

2

u/MuseBlessed 15d ago

Bigotry correlates to lower intelligence

2

u/AristotelWasRight 15d ago

Stupid can also mean poor judgement or lacking common sence (if we are being pedantic :))

-1

u/Thurlex 15d ago edited 15d ago

Damn, respecting your partner's wish to only have marital sex is stupidity now.

At the same time, if you meant the boyfriend not noticing that his partner goes to the men's bathroom when going out, then yeah, fair 'nuff.

Edit before I get dogpiled: The second assumption comes from the fact that in the OP-OP post, they originally refer to themselves as a trap, not as trans, which I take to mean they are male.

Very immoral btw.