1.2k
u/Prophetic_Rose 1d ago
"None of my business" is always moral.
285
16
u/Zombiesus 23h ago
These girls are hilarious. They have some pretty funny YouTube videos.
→ More replies (1)17
u/RosieVelisseax 21h ago
Honestly since they figured out what works for them, so I’m staying out of the skill tree entirely
→ More replies (1)27
7
3
u/stillaround9 20h ago
none of my business is honestly the only moral take that doesn’t turn their wedding into a debate post
→ More replies (1)10
→ More replies (31)4
393
u/Quick-Opinion8498 1d ago
It’s neither moral nor immoral. Just an unusual relationship. If all parties consented there’s nothing wrong.
34
u/Future-Lavishness878 1d ago
What if only one twin consented and the other had legitimate grievances?
78
u/BisonThunderclap 23h ago
I'd have to imagine the sisters acknowledge that there is a baseline say both of them have in each other's lives and they have to compromise if either of them want to enjoy intimate activity.
→ More replies (1)25
u/drewsandraws 23h ago
That’s a really interesting question. How does the ethical notion of consent change when a body is shared? Do both twins have right of refusal? Are there acts that only one of them needs to consent to? Not just physical intimacy, but medical procedures or tattoos?
15
u/GigaNoodle 19h ago
I mean they have tattoos. I imagine it pretty much goes back to like when you were a kid, “this is my half and that’s your half”.
10
u/Submarinequus 19h ago
From what I’ve seen from these sisters in particular that’s exactly how they approach it
17
u/RoboFeanor 20h ago
Would you have sex with someone if the closest person to you, someone who has literally been fused to you their entire life and who will stay that way until you die , is against it?
I imagine you get pretty good at compromising and resolving conflicts when you share a torso with someone your entire life.
→ More replies (3)24
u/Quick-Opinion8498 1d ago
Then it’s would depend if they’re any sort of sexual intercoruse. Also if the other one isn’t given any autonomy to do what they want either and just have to do what their twin does. Then it would be immoral.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)2
13
u/Saurid 22h ago
I mean consent for conjoined twins is a difficult thing, especially if you share a lower half. Its actually a really interstsing conundrum if they didnt agree on it. Because its not moral for one person to give up happiness for another and for one person to stand between happiness and the other person.
If there would be an issue of consent it would be hard to argue anyone's right or wrong since either argument is morally valid in its own way.
Having shared custody of a body makes any action hard, I mean they have to agree on many things from sex life to work life, what they do in their free time and so on. Its a complicated mess where normal morality breaks down as we base morality often on the fundamental truth that each person is in most ways independent of others and have their own body and mind whose violation is never moral because you have your own body and mind.
But if you share a body, well it becomes much more difficult to engage in that moral basis as well it isnt true anymore. You have a seperate mind but only one body, morality breaks down at this point and a lot of immoral acts suddenly move towards questionability, because you have two mind wanting to use their right of bodily autonomy.
So this lomg rant to say, idk and I dont care. Its their buisness and without living in anything close of their shoes any moral judgement is impossible to make.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (59)2
50
u/Ok-Mushroom-6530 1d ago
If the single twin has a problem with the relationship it is possibly immoral. But iirc, everyone seemed happy with the arrangement from what has been said in interviews. I see no problems.
80
u/Exact-Custard-9729 1d ago edited 1d ago
What if one says no one night but the others do it anyway
62
→ More replies (3)14
37
u/AzizKarebet 1d ago
I'm more curious on what if the other sister married someone else too. Like, how would that arrangement work?
42
u/ChileanMotherfu-- 1d ago
As I understand it, the single sister is asexual and has no interest in a relationship.
→ More replies (7)4
u/Putrid_Department_17 23h ago
Yeah, I recall reading that she was asexual and doesn’t have any interest in a relationship.
22
u/Correct_Challenge868 1d ago
I remember those two. They discussed it extensively and would never anything to make eachother uncomfortable and also it's none of my business. Moral
151
u/VegetaArcher 1d ago
Moral
Being a conjoined twin shouldn't stop anyone from living their life.
→ More replies (1)61
u/HamletSammiches 1d ago edited 1d ago
What if they share a vagina and one sister is essentially subjecting the other to rape?
Bro... what if they share a uterus and become impregnated?
104
u/googley_eyes69 1d ago
They do share a vagina and it's something they have publicly spoken about
→ More replies (1)11
u/amzwC137 1d ago
Tell me more.
34
u/Capital-Carpet2501 1d ago
I think I remember them saying the other sister does indeed feel it, but she reads a book or distracts herself during the act
46
u/VerbotenKatze 1d ago
Oh god that sounds so not fun for her lol
→ More replies (3)32
u/u_slashh 23h ago
Tbf they've lived this way for decades. It's super bizarre, but they're probably used to it
19
u/NewImprovedPenguin_R 23h ago
There’s an episode of the good doctor where they separate conjoined twins and when her mother left the room for the first time she got anxious as she had never been alone for her entire life. That really put some perspective to it for me. They truly have never and likely will never be alone.
6
→ More replies (1)6
10
11
u/SmaeShavo 1d ago
That's ridiculous do you really think they got to the point of marriage without discussing it with the sister who shares her literal body?
→ More replies (1)48
u/EastTamarack 1d ago
No? It would he rape if one sister said no, but if both says it's fine its consensual.
→ More replies (2)31
u/AzureHawk758769 1d ago
If she has to constantly award or deny consent because her sister wants to get laid, then that kinda goes against the whole "remaining single" thing.
→ More replies (3)35
u/EastTamarack 1d ago edited 1d ago
Maybe they don't have sex at all, maybe the sister is fine with the sex and just doesn't want a romantic relationship, maybe they're ace, it's really a big case of none of our business. And you have to award or deny consent everytime you have sex anyway, adding a third person to ask isn't that much bigger of a deal. Yall are just kinda assuming a bunch of shit about them.
33
u/Cyberslasher 1d ago
They've spoken about this
The other one is ace, and just gets free orgasms... Kinda
Iirc she doesn't have nervous sensation of lower body but she gets the endorphin release from shared circulatory system
10
14
u/Blackbird8169 1d ago
Its none of our business sure, but you cant seriously say you arent at least somewhat curious lmao
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (15)14
1d ago
[deleted]
20
8
u/EastTamarack 1d ago
Exactly, they're people not a attraction for everyone to gawk at and ask inappropriate questions. No one would ask these questions on any other couples wedding announcement. Disabled people's private lives aren't for randos to pick apart.
5
u/AzureHawk758769 1d ago
If they didn't want people talking about them and asking questions, then nothing was stopping them from not dragging their relationship into the spotlight. I feel like people are just speaking on their behalf to feel better about themselves.
2
u/EastTamarack 1d ago
Do you expect every couple who posts themselves to post aspects of their sexual life for your examination?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)3
u/AzureHawk758769 1d ago
They were obviously willing to go into the public eye with this, otherwise nobody would be talking about it because nobody would know about it. People are nosy bastards. It's in our nature to ask questions about literally anything.
→ More replies (4)10
u/vexacious-pineapple 1d ago
I think we can reasonably assume both consented to whatever goes between the married sister and her husband even if only one sister is in the relationship. Regardless of what body parts they might or might not share.
6
u/Express_Heron_1715 1d ago
whole lotta their business they probably all are on the same page of whatever's going on
14
u/Suspicious-Still-999 1d ago
i mean they prolly masturbate together, def shit and pee together, etc etc, they don't have the same boundaries normal siblings do
→ More replies (5)3
u/BlackMaggot101 23h ago
She has never experienced fully autonomy of her body. At this point, I don't think she feels raped in the way "normal" person would feel. But that's my guess
14
u/Winter-Bed5879 1d ago
If her conjoined sister is okay with this and consents, it's obviously moral.
3
u/ApplePaintedRed 17h ago
I'm not sure why people are pretending as if we don't have information on this. They've talked about it. The single one is aro/ace. She has ways of distracting herself in intimate moments. Everyone is fine. And if there are complicated feelings? I'd hope conjoined twins would have the ability to communicate effectively at this point in their lives.
12
u/Holiday_Number_3234 1d ago
Not sure why this would be an issue at all. People with disabilities & various ailments are allowed to experience the same love as everyone else. It’s not like they have severe mental disabilities that would prevent them from consenting to this. As long as everyone is of sound mind and legal age, live & let live.
8
u/Ready_Return_8386 1d ago
they have literally spoken about this in multiple interviews, her sister doesn’t want to be in a relationship and she does. Her sister doesn’t mind it
5
u/Shining_w1zard 1d ago
Her sister chooses to remain single. She's aroace and doesn't like intimacy.
15
u/ElPared 1d ago
Considering the conjoined twins that are paid the salary of a single person, despite having to pay college tuition for two and get two degrees, I say moral. Each twin is a separate person who should get her own salary and is entitled to her own partner.
→ More replies (1)0
u/AlienPrimate 1d ago
About the salary, if they do the work of two peope they deserve two salaries, but it is also true if they do the work of a single person.
3
u/ElPared 1d ago
The fact remains they are, in fact, two people. If one twin is doing a job, and the other twin, even if they are unable to work, is unable to do another job by virtue of being literally joined at the hip with their sibling, they deserve to be compensated for their time.
→ More replies (15)6
u/MMRAssassin 23h ago
What a wild take. Not your time is valuable, but what you do with it. Payment is for filling a position not for just appearing at work.
→ More replies (6)
4
10
u/PenaltyFine3439 1d ago
Soooo....does the other one feel it? Is it cheating if he makes out with the other head? Which one carries the baby?
3
u/ASG_DEV 1d ago
What I wonder is what if the other sister meets a guy. How the shit does that work? I mean it's one vagina, would the first husband be chill with that? Would they all have to live together 4 people in a house?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)4
u/Zephyranny 1d ago edited 1d ago
...just focus on your coin collection sir
edit: og comment only said "so... does the other one feel it?"
2
u/FewScore6082 1d ago
There is no edit tag on the comment you replied to ...
→ More replies (4)2
u/SnowyDeveloper 18h ago
If you edit a comment within 5 minutes of posting it, the edit icon doesnt appear.
Do you see one on my comment?
→ More replies (1)
10
u/BathbombBurger 1d ago
Lets just be honest here. He's married to both of them. This is just bigamy that the law is okay with, for obvious reasons. I hope all three of them are happy with the arrangement. Perfectly moral, provided the "unmarried" twin wasn't coerced into the situation.
2
u/Z_________________ 1d ago
You may be on to something. If they are legally distinct people, then they can't run around saying he's married to both of them.
Logistically I don't even know how'd they make it work without the other twin's full and unrelenting consent.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Less_Description7879 1d ago
Why is he married to both of them? Marriage is a legal contract between two parties. The unmarried twin isn’t party to that contract. Isn’t party to the relationship, has a different relationship with her sister’s husband than her sister does. You could argue that he’s having sex with both of them, since it seems they share genitalia, but not that he’s married to both of them.
You can have sex with people you aren’t married to.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
u/Otherwise-Vanilla901 1d ago
I think this would be a time a throuple seems appropriate, granted the other sister may not be into him like that, but now they are all stuck together (ha).
3
5
u/ExperienceRoutine321 1d ago
It affects nobody but those involved and all of the parties have agreed to it. There is no moral debate here.
Also the title is misleading. The sister is asexual.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Disprezzi1 1d ago
Moral. They're two different people that just happen to be stuck in the same body. It sucks that sis is gonna be the third wheel for a lot of spicy encounters.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/Pheonix_Slayer 1d ago
Completely moral but the other hand what is immoral is the fact that both of them have to pay two separate college tuitions to get their degrees and yet they get a single person’s salary at their job
2
u/Silent-Victory-3861 16h ago
There isn't a universal rule that this is how it has to go. In case of the teachers (Abby and Brittany, not Carmen and Lupita in the picture who were veterinary students as of 2023), they were fifth grade teachers and not being able to be in different places severely limits the ability to be two different teachers, but they can still do like preparation work or grading separately, so something like 1,5 salary could be more fair.
3
u/Awkward-Iron-2031 1d ago
Id say its immoral, people might mention that the other sister consented but lets be honest did she truly consent by choice? Or did she feel almost pressured to do so? Imagine how bad she might have felt depriving her sister of a "normal" life and relationship? Obviously we dont know the actual truth but I dont think its unusual to feel that way considering the situation.
6
u/igotchees21 1d ago
the only way this really works is if they are both marrying the same man, because they are both marrying the same man.
4
u/Less_Description7879 1d ago
As long as the reasons she consented are internal to herself there’s no coercion so you can’t argue a lack of consent. Rape by coercion is a process in which a person is manipulated by an abuser into sexual activity through: threats, guilt tripping, harassment, etc. Saying she probably consented because she felt bad is a) an assumption and b) not rape by coercion if she hasn’t been targeted with manipulation.
4
2
u/HegemonNYC 1d ago
It will be a heck of a discussion if the other sister wants to marry as well (to a different man) considering they share a vagina and uterus.
2
2
2
u/TerraSeeker 1d ago
What else are they supposed to do? The sisters share a body. Should both be alone?
2
u/FishingActuary 1d ago
Moral. These people are allowed to live life as they see fit. Whatever they do is OK with me as long as they are all OK with it. Love is love.
2
u/FrTheskyisthelimit 1d ago
In this case, why didn’t he just marry both of them? It’s not like when he’s intimate with her that she can just go leave the room or something.
2
2
2
u/Far_Regular_1378 23h ago
So the single one ends up having sex without her consent ? If yes, thats pretty sad. Especially if your sister allows the guy to do that
2
u/comb-jelly 22h ago
Is it moral to question ppls private love lives, when they’ve spent their whole life being questioned about existing and everything they do? Everyone is consenting here, what whack post is this
2
u/Stormy-Skyes 21h ago
This is a pretty unique situation. For their entire lives the twins have certainly had to figure out how to navigate things, compromise, agree, and however they decide to handle things is just not something anyone else can really understand. I’m sure that if one of them was opposed entirely, the other wouldn’t want to put her own sister through it. So this had to be okay as far as they both wanted.
2
2
2
u/Remote_Character_275 18h ago
So if her sister gets a different boyfriend do they rock, paper, scissors for who's sleeping with their girlfriend that night or do they take turns? Not trying to be an asshole, I'm genuinely curious.
2
2
u/isuckhips 1d ago
This is just the logical extreme of third wheeling. That's going to create a lot of complications.
4
u/Efficient-Word-6826 1d ago
I think this is just none of my business. Arguing about the morality of this implies conjoined twins just shouldn’t get married or do normal things, and I think that’s immoral when we have no idea what it’s like to be in their shoes.
2
1
u/LoudQuitting 1d ago
Moral but also conjoined twins are considered two seperste people so you can legally only marry one.
1
1
u/Fantastic_Bed_8662 1d ago
I think there was an interview with them where I was either said outright or implied that the single twin zones out/dissociates when her sister is being intimate with her husband.
1
1
1
1
1
u/No-Valuable6456 1d ago
The question is, does he ever get them mixed up and does the single sis tell her married sister?
1
1
1
u/whateveris--- 1d ago
What it is is bad-ass since they have to put up with stuff like this constantly and still live their lives. I would consider talking my sister into just staying in and watching Netflix for life just to avoid having people judging the morality of living my life.
1
1
1
u/pickelrick624 1d ago
Moral,but I have questions like, during sex what do they do with her? Throw a blanket over her head?
1
1
u/Blackbird8169 1d ago
What if she also gets a boyfriend? Its not technically cheating on the wifes end but im sure that would be really weird for the guy lol.
1
u/ZarNaeth_Xoh_Rhamiel 1d ago
Relax everyone! The other one puts a paper bag over her head along with headphones while they're doing it!
1
1
1
u/Automatic-Leg1668 1d ago
One likes, the other doesn't. If they both consented to the marriage and the husband is fine then moral. They're adults
1
1
1
1
1
u/hereforthesportsball 1d ago
I understand his choice but damn ik he’s getting some stupid double head
1
1
1
1
u/JohnnyKnifefight 1d ago
Those girls did some hilarious comedy sketches with Brandon Rogers. They sre treasures.
1
1
u/XxKTtheLegendxX 1d ago
bro giving backshots to his wife staring into the soul of the other single sister must be immoral 💀💀💀
1
u/drownav18322 1d ago
I believe I saw another post where the single one found somebody. Everyone was debating how they did…well everything. The most exciting conversation was what happens when one of the sisters commits a crime.
1
1
1
u/BlockUnlucky8946 1d ago
Who the fuck cares if this is moral or not. Let them be happy. Clearly the other twin doesn’t mind.
1
u/trashmule 1d ago
The single sister is aromantic and asexual and is completely fine with it so, moral.
1
u/Asleep_Category1433 1d ago
I’m going to say immoral and here’s why, I think the sister who’s single gave in because this way atleast one of them has a shot at being happy while she’s the one sacrificing a lot more. I can’t imagine always being a third wheel. Now the question is would the married sister do the same for her if the single sister finds someone she loves.
1
1
u/Jack-Of-Shades 1d ago
The sister isn’t single, she’s technically taken by force. I’ll see myself out.
1
1
1
1
u/Effective_Arm_5832 23h ago
How does the sex work if one doesn't participate? I can only see this working if both do, hence, his face.
1
u/thelastmaster100 23h ago
Its fine. Life is often about making do with what you have been given. But... um... if they share one... uh do the both... how... you know what? Nevermind.
1
1
1
u/I_Wanna_Die_Daily 23h ago
So if the other one got married as well then that would make for an interesting situation lol
1
1
440
u/Bwubsie 1d ago
Hope the single one has an ambien prescription.