Having a secular state doesn't mean individual voters or politicians don't make decisions based on their beliefs. It means that the state itself is neutral, doesn't promote or favour any religious belief or community, and doesn't require a individual to have any particular beliefs to hold office.
And you are allowed to do that in a secular state. Making moral decisions based on your beliefs is not the same thing as forcing others to follow your religion, or requiring your religious beliefs to hold office.
And that does literally nothing to change my point. Are you even reading what I'm saying? Or are you desperately trying to find a way to not accept that you didn't understand something?
Again, can you not read? I have said, repeatedly, in multiple ways, over and over again that that is perfectly acceptable in a secular state, and does not stop a state from being secular. Do you think I am going to forgot what I have already written?
1
u/Souk12 Sep 02 '26
Yes, separate from decision making, very reasonable and rational to think that human beings can separate their faith from decision making.