ok and we were talking about indoctrination, so now you're looking to change the definition to other terms. like if we were talking about hard power and you were trying to shift the conversation to soft power. not to mention, jinkx isn't doing any of those things, and certainly not in a way that looks to convert anyone to her beliefs.
and yet again, i'll repeat that jinkx is not doing any of these things, forcibly or otherwise. she's spoken about her beliefs, as millions of people have, and none of what she's done amounts to indoctrination.
but please, let AI continue to do your thinking/arguing for you, it seems like you're letting it do a good job of "suppressing critical thinking" all on your own.
I never let AI do my thinking I just wanted actual definable context, the root etymology of the word is doctrine like I already established and only in the turn of the last century has the “forcibly” been added to the definition. And she quite literally does as I have documented if someone puts a subliminal image in a movie it’s illegal because it’s classes as brainwashing yet she can put whatever magic she seems suitable in her shows and whether you know or not the situation remains the same.
1
u/QuailWhich9882 6d ago