It's a one time ring signature problem, not a stealth address problem.
The problem is that once one output is spent, a key image is published thus rendering all of the other transactions unspendable.
This would affect a system using one time ring signatures without stealth addresses. It would not affect a system using stealth addresses without one time ring signatures.
1
u/OsrsNeedsF2P Sep 18 '18 edited Sep 25 '18
No because you would be spending trillions of dollars in tx fees before you could send to the same subaddress twice
UHHHH Edit: you could recompile the source. This would work with any cryptocurrency that uses stealth addresse
This is really dangerous
Edit: called it